Organ Procurement Organization Approach of ICU Families in Person Versus by Phone for Donation Authorization.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001277
Qiang Zhang, Brandon McKown, Winnie Lau, Tamara A Strohm, Lisa A Paolillo, Alexandra K Glazier, Jill P Stinebring, David Y Hwang
{"title":"Organ Procurement Organization Approach of ICU Families in Person Versus by Phone for Donation Authorization.","authors":"Qiang Zhang, Brandon McKown, Winnie Lau, Tamara A Strohm, Lisa A Paolillo, Alexandra K Glazier, Jill P Stinebring, David Y Hwang","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Due to hospital visitor restriction policies, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many conversations between ICU patients' families and organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to be conducted by phone, as opposed to in-person. We aimed to determine if OPO phone approaches are a negative predictor of authorization for donation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals partnering with New England Donor Services (NEDS) as their OPO.</p><p><strong>Patients/subjects: </strong>Multicenter database study of all ICU patients from 2017 to 2021 whose families had been approached by NEDS. Of note, registered organ donors who were declared brain dead were excluded due to their prior first-person authorization. However, registered organ donors who were candidates for donation after circulatory death were included in the analysis because of the family's role in controlling the timing of ventilator withdrawal and, thus, their critical role in determining donation success.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In addition to whether OPO approaches occurred in person or by phone, we extracted covariate data on patient and surrogate demographics, OPO representative training, and extent of ICU-OPO collaboration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine predictors of successful authorization. Among 2240 approaches of potential organ donors, OPO donation discussions by phone constituted 221 of 1282 (17%) of authorizations, as opposed to 134 of 958 (14%) of failed attempts (<i>p</i> = 0.04). In a multivariate model, phone approach was no longer significantly negatively associated with authorization. However, patient race/ethnicity, registered status for donors after cardiac death, ICU-OPO collaboration, specialized OPO representative training, OPO representative being the sole participant in authorization discussions, and surrogate relationship were strong predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OPO approach by phone is not a barrier to organ donation. Strategies for successful donation discussions should focus on collaborative processes between ICU teams and OPOs and involvement of OPO representatives with special training for discussing authorization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 6","pages":"e1277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Due to hospital visitor restriction policies, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many conversations between ICU patients' families and organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to be conducted by phone, as opposed to in-person. We aimed to determine if OPO phone approaches are a negative predictor of authorization for donation.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Hospitals partnering with New England Donor Services (NEDS) as their OPO.

Patients/subjects: Multicenter database study of all ICU patients from 2017 to 2021 whose families had been approached by NEDS. Of note, registered organ donors who were declared brain dead were excluded due to their prior first-person authorization. However, registered organ donors who were candidates for donation after circulatory death were included in the analysis because of the family's role in controlling the timing of ventilator withdrawal and, thus, their critical role in determining donation success.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In addition to whether OPO approaches occurred in person or by phone, we extracted covariate data on patient and surrogate demographics, OPO representative training, and extent of ICU-OPO collaboration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine predictors of successful authorization. Among 2240 approaches of potential organ donors, OPO donation discussions by phone constituted 221 of 1282 (17%) of authorizations, as opposed to 134 of 958 (14%) of failed attempts (p = 0.04). In a multivariate model, phone approach was no longer significantly negatively associated with authorization. However, patient race/ethnicity, registered status for donors after cardiac death, ICU-OPO collaboration, specialized OPO representative training, OPO representative being the sole participant in authorization discussions, and surrogate relationship were strong predictors.

Conclusions: OPO approach by phone is not a barrier to organ donation. Strategies for successful donation discussions should focus on collaborative processes between ICU teams and OPOs and involvement of OPO representatives with special training for discussing authorization.

ICU家属当面与电话授权器官采购的组织方式。
目的:由于医院访客限制政策,COVID-19大流行迫使ICU患者家属与器官采购组织(opo)之间的许多对话通过电话进行,而不是面对面交谈。我们的目的是确定OPO电话方法是否为捐赠授权的负面预测因子。设计:回顾性观察性研究。环境:与新英格兰捐赠服务机构(NEDS)合作的医院作为其OPO。患者/受试者:2017年至2021年所有ICU患者的多中心数据库研究,这些患者的家属曾接受过NEDS治疗。值得注意的是,被宣布脑死亡的登记器官捐献者由于事先获得第一人称授权而被排除在外。然而,在循环性死亡后作为捐献候选人的登记器官捐献者被纳入分析,因为其家庭在控制呼吸机摘取时间方面的作用,因此,他们在决定捐赠成功方面的关键作用。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:除了OPO方法是亲自还是通过电话进行外,我们还提取了有关患者和代理人口统计学,OPO代表培训以及ICU-OPO合作程度的协变量数据。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定成功授权的预测因素。在2240种潜在器官捐献者的途径中,通过电话进行的OPO捐赠讨论占1282例授权中的221例(17%),而失败的958例中有134例(14%)(p = 0.04)。在多变量模型中,电话方法不再与授权显著负相关。然而,患者的种族/民族、心脏死亡后捐赠者的登记状况、ICU-OPO合作、OPO代表的专门培训、OPO代表是授权讨论的唯一参与者以及代理关系是强有力的预测因素。结论:电话OPO途径不是器官捐献的障碍。成功讨论捐赠的策略应侧重于ICU团队和OPO之间的协作过程,以及OPO代表参与讨论授权的特殊培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信