Validation of a Novel device for Assessing Neck Muscle Strength.

IF 2.9 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2025.3476
Michail Arvanitidis, Hon Hin Ken Mak, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes, Marco Barbero, Deborah Falla
{"title":"Validation of a Novel device for Assessing Neck Muscle Strength.","authors":"Michail Arvanitidis, Hon Hin Ken Mak, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes, Marco Barbero, Deborah Falla","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Neuromuscular Cranio-Cervical Device (NOD) was originally designed to evaluate Cranio-Cervical Flexion Test performance but can also be used as a handheld dynamometer for testing other muscle groups, including neck muscle strength. It offers a potential alternative to the Multi-Cervical Unit (MCU), a fixed dynamometer, more closely aligned with isokinetic dynamometry, the gold standard. However, its validity and reliability need to be established. This study aimed to evaluate concurrent validity compared to the MCU and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the NOD for measuring neck flexion and extension muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty participants were assessed for neck flexion/extension strength whilst in a seated position, with the measurements repeated over three sessions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing NOD measurements to the MCU using Pearson correlation coefficients, and reliability was determined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concurrent validity was strong for extension (r = 0.954) but lower for flexion (r = 0.705), indicating some variability in flexion measurements. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for both flexion (ICC = 0.931) and extension (ICC = 0.896). Intra-rater reliability for extension was good to excellent (ICC = 0.893), while flexion ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.844).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NOD is a valid tool, particularly for extension measurements, although further refinement of testing is needed to improve the accuracy for flexion strength measurements. It is also reliable for both extension and flexion, showing promise as a practical, affordable, portable tool with real-time feedback for the assessment of neck muscle strength in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Neuromuscular Cranio-Cervical Device (NOD) was originally designed to evaluate Cranio-Cervical Flexion Test performance but can also be used as a handheld dynamometer for testing other muscle groups, including neck muscle strength. It offers a potential alternative to the Multi-Cervical Unit (MCU), a fixed dynamometer, more closely aligned with isokinetic dynamometry, the gold standard. However, its validity and reliability need to be established. This study aimed to evaluate concurrent validity compared to the MCU and inter- and intra-rater reliability of the NOD for measuring neck flexion and extension muscle strength.

Methods: Twenty participants were assessed for neck flexion/extension strength whilst in a seated position, with the measurements repeated over three sessions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing NOD measurements to the MCU using Pearson correlation coefficients, and reliability was determined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Concurrent validity was strong for extension (r = 0.954) but lower for flexion (r = 0.705), indicating some variability in flexion measurements. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for both flexion (ICC = 0.931) and extension (ICC = 0.896). Intra-rater reliability for extension was good to excellent (ICC = 0.893), while flexion ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.844).

Conclusions: The NOD is a valid tool, particularly for extension measurements, although further refinement of testing is needed to improve the accuracy for flexion strength measurements. It is also reliable for both extension and flexion, showing promise as a practical, affordable, portable tool with real-time feedback for the assessment of neck muscle strength in clinical settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种评估颈部肌肉力量的新型装置的验证。
背景:神经肌肉颅颈装置(NOD)最初设计用于评估颅颈屈曲测试性能,但也可作为手持式测功仪用于测试其他肌肉群,包括颈部肌肉力量。它为多颈椎单元(MCU)提供了一种潜在的替代方案,MCU是一种固定式测力仪,与黄金标准等速测力仪更接近。但其效度和信度有待建立。本研究旨在评估与MCU相比,NOD在测量颈部屈伸肌力量时的并发效度以及内部和内部的可靠性。方法:对20名参与者进行了颈部屈曲/伸展强度评估,同时处于坐姿,测量重复了三个疗程。通过使用Pearson相关系数比较NOD测量值与MCU测量值来评估并发效度,并使用类内相关系数(ICCs)来确定信度。结果:伸伸的同时效度较强(r = 0.954),屈曲的同时效度较低(r = 0.705),表明屈曲测量存在一定的可变性。屈曲(ICC = 0.931)和伸展(ICC = 0.896)的评分间信度均为良好至优异。伸关节的内信度从良好到优秀(ICC = 0.893),屈曲关节的内信度从中等到优秀(ICC = 0.844)。结论:NOD是一种有效的工具,特别是用于拉伸测量,尽管需要进一步改进测试以提高弯曲强度测量的准确性。它对于伸展和屈曲也是可靠的,显示出作为一种实用的、负担得起的、便携式的工具,在临床环境中用于评估颈部肌肉力量的实时反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信