A phase 2, proof-of-concept, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Usnoflast (ZYIL1) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

IF 2.8
Amit Yeole, Laxmi Khanna, Maulik Doshi, Arvind Sharma, Pratik Uttarwar, Suyog Doshi, Rana Kaushik Kumar, N Venkataramana, Deven Parmar
{"title":"A phase 2, proof-of-concept, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Usnoflast (ZYIL1) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"Amit Yeole, Laxmi Khanna, Maulik Doshi, Arvind Sharma, Pratik Uttarwar, Suyog Doshi, Rana Kaushik Kumar, N Venkataramana, Deven Parmar","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2515900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: To assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Usnoflast (ZYIL1) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). <i>Methods</i>: Patients with a probable or definite ALS diagnosis were randomized to receive twice daily oral doses (for 12 weeks) of Usnoflast (25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was the change in ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes were assessment of PK, change in slow vital capacity (SVC) and serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light (NfL) chain from baseline to week 12, and safety up to 12 weeks. <i>Results</i>: Total 24 patients were enrolled; 71% of those who received Usnoflast had the drug above therapeutic concentration in CSF. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, least square mean changes (ANCOVA) in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to week 12 were -1.91 for Usnoflast 25 mg, -3.84 for Usnoflast 50 mg, 0.52 for Usnoflast 75 mg, and -2.26 for placebo arm. Though not significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05), compared with placebo, Usnoflast 75 mg demonstrated a difference of 2.78 (mITT) and 3.28 (per-protocol) in ALSFRS-R total score. Statistical non-significant differences were also observed in changes of SVC% and CSF NfL levels. Usnoflast was well-tolerated at tested doses, and there was no treatment-emergent serious adverse event or death during the study duration. <i>Conclusion</i>: Usnoflast 50 and 75 mg doses were well-tolerated in ALS patients, providing rationale for further studies of Usnoflast in ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"794-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2515900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Usnoflast (ZYIL1) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: Patients with a probable or definite ALS diagnosis were randomized to receive twice daily oral doses (for 12 weeks) of Usnoflast (25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was the change in ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes were assessment of PK, change in slow vital capacity (SVC) and serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light (NfL) chain from baseline to week 12, and safety up to 12 weeks. Results: Total 24 patients were enrolled; 71% of those who received Usnoflast had the drug above therapeutic concentration in CSF. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, least square mean changes (ANCOVA) in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to week 12 were -1.91 for Usnoflast 25 mg, -3.84 for Usnoflast 50 mg, 0.52 for Usnoflast 75 mg, and -2.26 for placebo arm. Though not significant (p > 0.05), compared with placebo, Usnoflast 75 mg demonstrated a difference of 2.78 (mITT) and 3.28 (per-protocol) in ALSFRS-R total score. Statistical non-significant differences were also observed in changes of SVC% and CSF NfL levels. Usnoflast was well-tolerated at tested doses, and there was no treatment-emergent serious adverse event or death during the study duration. Conclusion: Usnoflast 50 and 75 mg doses were well-tolerated in ALS patients, providing rationale for further studies of Usnoflast in ALS.

一项2期、概念验证、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心、双盲研究,旨在评估Usnoflast (ZYIL1)对肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者的疗效、安全性、耐受性、药代动力学和药效学。
目的:评价Usnoflast (ZYIL1)治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)的疗效、安全性、药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)。方法:可能或明确诊断为ALS的患者随机接受Usnoflast (25 mg, 50 mg或75 mg)或安慰剂每日两次口服剂量(12周)。主要终点是ALS功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)总评分从基线到第12周的变化。次要结局是评估PK、慢速肺活量(SVC)、血清和脑脊液(CSF)水平的变化,从基线到第12周,以及长达12周的安全性。结果:共纳入24例患者;接受Usnoflast治疗的患者脑脊液中药物浓度高于治疗浓度的占71%。在改良意向治疗(mITT)人群中,Usnoflast 25 mg组至第12周ALSFRS-R总评分的最小二方平均变化(ANCOVA)为-1.91,Usnoflast 50 mg组为-3.84,Usnoflast 75 mg组为0.52,安慰剂组为-2.26。虽然与安慰剂相比,Usnoflast 75 mg在ALSFRS-R总分上的差异为2.78 (mITT)和3.28 (per-protocol),但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组SVC%和CSF NfL水平变化差异无统计学意义。Usnoflast在测试剂量下耐受性良好,在研究期间没有出现治疗引起的严重不良事件或死亡。结论:Usnoflast 50和75 mg剂量在ALS患者中耐受性良好,为Usnoflast在ALS中的进一步研究提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信