A Bundle of Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers During Prone Position in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Results of a French Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"A Bundle of Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers During Prone Position in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Results of a French Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lucile Gay, Laure Huot, Hodane Yonis, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraeich, Dominique Matthieu, Arnaud Gacouin, Carole Ouisse, Jean Reignier, Audrey Massard, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Caroline Revol, Adrien Robine, Olivier Guillemault, Gaël Bourdin, Angélina Robert, Jean-Claude Lacherade, Céline Perarder, Michel Badet, Loredana Baboi, Muriel Rabilloud, Evelyne Decullier, Eloïse Montagne, Raphaële Girard, Christine Arcuset, Julie Mevel, Aurélie Méry de Montigny, Claude Guérin","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, the frequency of pressure ulcers is higher in the prone position than in the supine position.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effect of a bundle of interventions to prevent pressure ulcers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome prone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>ESCARD is a stepped-wedge prospective multicentre trial conducted in France that included patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, intubated and with an indication for pronation. In the control period, patients received the routine means of each centre. In the experimental period, the bundle of specific standardized means included: eye protection with methylcellulose; strapped lower eyelids; 15° body inclination; specific cushions inserted between the mattress and head/thorax and knees/feet; head rotation every 4 h. The primary end-point was the occurrence of a new pressure ulcer at any location and stage in the anterior part of the body 7 days after inclusion. It was assessed from pictures taken in the supine position and independently analysed by two experts blinded to the allocated period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 16 April 2018 to 3 December 2020 (with an interruption between 12 March and 15 July 2020 because of COVID pandemic), a total of 160 patients were included in 9 centres; 156 were analysed. At the first proning session, all 6 specific preventive means were implemented in 1.2% of the patients in the control period and 91.8% in the experimental period. At Day 7, 53 patients (63.9%) in the control versus 40 (54.8%) in the experimental period had a new pressure ulcer at any location and of any stage (odds ratio = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [0.39; 2.18]). There was a 42.8% discrepancy between the two experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective multicentre stepped-wedge trial, the bundle of interventions did not lead to a significant reduction in the frequency of new pressure ulcers in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients treated by prone position.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The critical care nurses were able to manage patients enrolled in a complex trial up to its planned end. Even though negative, the study should encourage intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to better define the bundle of interventions including introducing other methods not used in the present study. ICU nurses should also assess the stage of pressure ulcers consistently over time. ICU nurses should consider further studies because pressure ulcer is a relevant issue of concern during the pronation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. If so, the new trial should include a larger number of ICUs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The protocol was approved by an ethics committee (number 2017-A01449-44 on 7 October 2017) and was recorded in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03125421).</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, the frequency of pressure ulcers is higher in the prone position than in the supine position.
Aim: To assess the effect of a bundle of interventions to prevent pressure ulcers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome prone.
Study design: ESCARD is a stepped-wedge prospective multicentre trial conducted in France that included patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, intubated and with an indication for pronation. In the control period, patients received the routine means of each centre. In the experimental period, the bundle of specific standardized means included: eye protection with methylcellulose; strapped lower eyelids; 15° body inclination; specific cushions inserted between the mattress and head/thorax and knees/feet; head rotation every 4 h. The primary end-point was the occurrence of a new pressure ulcer at any location and stage in the anterior part of the body 7 days after inclusion. It was assessed from pictures taken in the supine position and independently analysed by two experts blinded to the allocated period.
Results: From 16 April 2018 to 3 December 2020 (with an interruption between 12 March and 15 July 2020 because of COVID pandemic), a total of 160 patients were included in 9 centres; 156 were analysed. At the first proning session, all 6 specific preventive means were implemented in 1.2% of the patients in the control period and 91.8% in the experimental period. At Day 7, 53 patients (63.9%) in the control versus 40 (54.8%) in the experimental period had a new pressure ulcer at any location and of any stage (odds ratio = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [0.39; 2.18]). There was a 42.8% discrepancy between the two experts.
Conclusions: In this prospective multicentre stepped-wedge trial, the bundle of interventions did not lead to a significant reduction in the frequency of new pressure ulcers in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients treated by prone position.
Relevance to clinical practice: The critical care nurses were able to manage patients enrolled in a complex trial up to its planned end. Even though negative, the study should encourage intensive care unit (ICU) nurses to better define the bundle of interventions including introducing other methods not used in the present study. ICU nurses should also assess the stage of pressure ulcers consistently over time. ICU nurses should consider further studies because pressure ulcer is a relevant issue of concern during the pronation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. If so, the new trial should include a larger number of ICUs.
Trial registration: The protocol was approved by an ethics committee (number 2017-A01449-44 on 7 October 2017) and was recorded in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03125421).
期刊介绍:
Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics.
Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories:
-research reports
-literature reviews
-developments in practice, education or management
-reflections on practice