Milo Challiner, Saroj Saurya, Sanjai Patel, Jordan W Raff, Maggy Fostier, Andreas Prokop
{"title":"Towards more sustainable research: reducing the environmental impact when working with Drosophila.","authors":"Milo Challiner, Saroj Saurya, Sanjai Patel, Jordan W Raff, Maggy Fostier, Andreas Prokop","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ever-increasing amounts of plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions worldwide threaten our environment. Biomedical laboratories across the world generate serious amounts of plastic waste often disposed of via high-emission strategies. Achieving sustainability is imperative but requires awareness and knowledge of the regulations, available options and their implications. To illustrate the thought processes involved we showcase the Manchester Fly Facility which supports work with the genetic model organism Drosophila and serves 13 research groups. In 2022, we estimated ∼4 tonnes of 'clinical' waste generation by the facility enriched with single-use polystyrene plastic containers, all frozen for 2 days and then incinerated. We calculate the resulting environmental and economic costs and compare them to practices reported to us from other fly facilities worldwide. We then discuss feasible management options, separately explaining alternative choices for (1) container materials, (2) the processing of genetically modified organisms, (3) re-use strategies and (4) waste management procedures. This information hopefully raises awareness and understanding to incentivise laboratories worldwide to adopt more sustainable choices, as is permitted by their local infrastructure and regulations. To illustrate what can be achieved, we extrapolate the Manchester data from 2022 to a period of 10 years and calculate the impact of different management strategies, indicating that up to 80% in greenhouse gas emissions and 76% in plastic waste can be saved. The resulting economic savings are of further benefit and could be re-invested to pay for additional workforce, which may otherwise pose an important barrier to re-use scenarios in many countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ever-increasing amounts of plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions worldwide threaten our environment. Biomedical laboratories across the world generate serious amounts of plastic waste often disposed of via high-emission strategies. Achieving sustainability is imperative but requires awareness and knowledge of the regulations, available options and their implications. To illustrate the thought processes involved we showcase the Manchester Fly Facility which supports work with the genetic model organism Drosophila and serves 13 research groups. In 2022, we estimated ∼4 tonnes of 'clinical' waste generation by the facility enriched with single-use polystyrene plastic containers, all frozen for 2 days and then incinerated. We calculate the resulting environmental and economic costs and compare them to practices reported to us from other fly facilities worldwide. We then discuss feasible management options, separately explaining alternative choices for (1) container materials, (2) the processing of genetically modified organisms, (3) re-use strategies and (4) waste management procedures. This information hopefully raises awareness and understanding to incentivise laboratories worldwide to adopt more sustainable choices, as is permitted by their local infrastructure and regulations. To illustrate what can be achieved, we extrapolate the Manchester data from 2022 to a period of 10 years and calculate the impact of different management strategies, indicating that up to 80% in greenhouse gas emissions and 76% in plastic waste can be saved. The resulting economic savings are of further benefit and could be re-invested to pay for additional workforce, which may otherwise pose an important barrier to re-use scenarios in many countries.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.