Supporting Health Care Resilience Through "Reflexive Spaces" in Home Care Services: A Multiple Embedded Case Study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Camilla Seljemo, Olav Røise, Eline Ree, Siri Wiig
{"title":"Supporting Health Care Resilience Through \"Reflexive Spaces\" in Home Care Services: A Multiple Embedded Case Study.","authors":"Camilla Seljemo, Olav Røise, Eline Ree, Siri Wiig","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore where and how managers facilitate arenas for collective reflections and knowledge sharing (\"reflexive spaces\") in homecare services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, we sought to understand how these \"reflexive spaces\" contributed to adaptations to challenges induced by the pandemic. Finally, we aimed to discuss how these spaces might incorporate resilience into health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multiple embedded case study includes interviews with health care staff (n=16) and managers at different system levels (n=21) from 4 Norwegian municipalities. The data were analyzed in accordance with reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The analysis identified 2 overarching themes: (1) arenas for reflection, communication, and dialogue, and (2) establishing new solutions through collective reflection facilitated by managers. Managers who initiated dialogue and established arenas for reflection and communication were highlighted as important for discussing and sharing knowledge about challenges created by the pandemic. In these spaces, both managers and staff reflected, collaborated, and learned from each other and then designed a tactical and resilient response to the ongoing challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Managers had a key role as facilitators for \"reflexive spaces\" within and across levels of responsibilities. Moreover, managers had a mediating role in bridging knowledge and understanding across levels within the health care system. Using \"reflexive spaces\" as part of daily practice appeared as an important measure to balance demands and capacity and respond both to crises and to everyday challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore where and how managers facilitate arenas for collective reflections and knowledge sharing ("reflexive spaces") in homecare services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, we sought to understand how these "reflexive spaces" contributed to adaptations to challenges induced by the pandemic. Finally, we aimed to discuss how these spaces might incorporate resilience into health care.

Methods: This multiple embedded case study includes interviews with health care staff (n=16) and managers at different system levels (n=21) from 4 Norwegian municipalities. The data were analyzed in accordance with reflexive thematic analysis.

Findings: The analysis identified 2 overarching themes: (1) arenas for reflection, communication, and dialogue, and (2) establishing new solutions through collective reflection facilitated by managers. Managers who initiated dialogue and established arenas for reflection and communication were highlighted as important for discussing and sharing knowledge about challenges created by the pandemic. In these spaces, both managers and staff reflected, collaborated, and learned from each other and then designed a tactical and resilient response to the ongoing challenges.

Conclusions: Managers had a key role as facilitators for "reflexive spaces" within and across levels of responsibilities. Moreover, managers had a mediating role in bridging knowledge and understanding across levels within the health care system. Using "reflexive spaces" as part of daily practice appeared as an important measure to balance demands and capacity and respond both to crises and to everyday challenges.

通过家庭护理服务中的“反身空间”支持卫生保健弹性:一个多重嵌入式案例研究。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨在COVID-19大流行期间,管理人员在何处以及如何促进家庭护理服务中的集体反思和知识共享(“反思空间”)。此外,我们试图了解这些“反射空间”如何有助于适应大流行带来的挑战。最后,我们旨在讨论这些空间如何将弹性纳入医疗保健。方法:这个多重嵌入式案例研究包括对来自4个挪威城市的卫生保健人员(n=16)和不同系统级别的管理人员(n=21)的访谈。根据反身性主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:分析确定了2个主要主题:(1)反思、沟通和对话的场所;(2)通过管理者促进的集体反思建立新的解决方案。与会者强调,发起对话并建立反思和沟通场所的管理人员对于讨论和分享有关大流行病带来的挑战的知识非常重要。在这些空间中,管理人员和员工相互反思、合作和学习,然后设计出应对持续挑战的战术和弹性反应。结论:管理者作为“反身空间”的促进者,在不同层次的责任中扮演着关键的角色。此外,管理人员在弥合知识和理解跨层次的卫生保健系统中的中介作用。使用“反身空间”作为日常实践的一部分,似乎是平衡需求和能力以及应对危机和日常挑战的重要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信