Socio-economic differences in receiving care by the over-80s in Germany and England: intensity of care needs as a moderator.

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Ursula Henz, Michael Wagner
{"title":"Socio-economic differences in receiving care by the over-80s in Germany and England: intensity of care needs as a moderator.","authors":"Ursula Henz, Michael Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s10433-025-00864-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing number of people aged 80 or older living in the community has raised concerns about meeting their care needs and about socio-economic inequalities in their care use. The study examines socio-economic status (SES) patterns in informal and formal care use, as well as unmet care needs, of people aged 80 or older living in the community in Germany and England. We propose that SES patterns in care use change with the intensity of care needs. The analyses use data from the Survey of Quality of Life and Well-Being of the Very Old in North Rhine-Westphalia and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Despite the differences in the long-term care systems (LTCSs) and cultural norms around filial obligations, we find a consistent pattern of association between socio-economic status (SES) and care use for older people with only few care needs in both countries. In this group, people with a higher SES have the highest likelihood of experiencing unmet care needs. For older people with many care needs, we find country-specific SES patterns that we link to cultural differences and the design of the LTCSs. In Germany, SES is negatively associated with using informal care and positively with using formal care. In England, care use shows little SES variation for older people with many care needs. The findings underscore the importance of considering the intensity of care needs when assessing inequalities in care access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":"22 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-025-00864-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing number of people aged 80 or older living in the community has raised concerns about meeting their care needs and about socio-economic inequalities in their care use. The study examines socio-economic status (SES) patterns in informal and formal care use, as well as unmet care needs, of people aged 80 or older living in the community in Germany and England. We propose that SES patterns in care use change with the intensity of care needs. The analyses use data from the Survey of Quality of Life and Well-Being of the Very Old in North Rhine-Westphalia and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Despite the differences in the long-term care systems (LTCSs) and cultural norms around filial obligations, we find a consistent pattern of association between socio-economic status (SES) and care use for older people with only few care needs in both countries. In this group, people with a higher SES have the highest likelihood of experiencing unmet care needs. For older people with many care needs, we find country-specific SES patterns that we link to cultural differences and the design of the LTCSs. In Germany, SES is negatively associated with using informal care and positively with using formal care. In England, care use shows little SES variation for older people with many care needs. The findings underscore the importance of considering the intensity of care needs when assessing inequalities in care access.

德国和英国80岁以上老人接受护理的社会经济差异:护理需求强度作为调节因素。
越来越多的80岁或以上的老人生活在社区,这引起了人们对满足他们的护理需求以及他们在护理使用方面的社会经济不平等的关注。该研究调查了德国和英国80岁及以上社区居民在非正式和正式护理使用方面的社会经济地位(SES)模式,以及未满足的护理需求。我们提出社会经济地位模式在护理使用中随护理需求的强度而变化。分析使用的数据来自北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州老年人生活质量和幸福感调查和英国老龄化纵向研究。尽管在长期护理系统(ltcs)和孝道义务的文化规范方面存在差异,但我们发现两国社会经济地位(SES)与只有很少护理需求的老年人的护理使用之间存在一致的关联模式。在这个群体中,社会经济地位较高的人最有可能经历未满足的护理需求。对于有许多护理需求的老年人,我们发现了国家特定的社会经济地位模式,我们将其与文化差异和长期社会服务体系的设计联系起来。在德国,社会经济地位与使用非正式护理呈负相关,与使用正式护理呈正相关。在英格兰,有许多护理需求的老年人的护理使用显示出很少的社会地位差异。研究结果强调了在评估获得护理不平等时考虑护理需求强度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信