Optimizing QACT Frequency and Setup Uncertainty in Cranial Proton Therapy for Normal Tissue Sparing.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100751
Rachel B Ger, Anh Tran, Victoria J Croog, Lawrence R Kleinberg, Carmen Kut, Brandi R Page, Kristin J Redmond, Heng Li
{"title":"Optimizing QACT Frequency and Setup Uncertainty in Cranial Proton Therapy for Normal Tissue Sparing.","authors":"Rachel B Ger, Anh Tran, Victoria J Croog, Lawrence R Kleinberg, Carmen Kut, Brandi R Page, Kristin J Redmond, Heng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proton therapy offers superior conformality in cranial dose distributions, but its sensitivity to anatomical air-tissue interfaces and patient setup variations can compromise dosimetric robustness. Quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans can verify these changes, though they increase cumulative dose and workflow burden. There are currently gaps in knowledge about the setup uncertainty margin that could maintain acceptable daily target coverage, organ at risk (OAR) sparing, and QACT frequency requirements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 122 adult patients treated for cranial targets between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were analyzed for adaptive planning rates based on if they had beams passing through the neck or not, and if beams passed through the nasal cavity or not. Twenty patients that did not have beams passing through the neck or nasal cavity were randomly selected and replanned using 2 mm setup uncertainty for robustness compared to the clinically utilized 3 mm setup uncertainty. Synthetic CTs were created for each daily cone beam CT, and the clinical goals were compared against the robustness expectations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients had adaptive plans, only 2 of which were due to anatomical changes, and both of these patients had beams passing through the nasal cavity. Volumetric clinical goals for the clinical target volume (CTV) were met in 95.7% and 99.6% of 2 and 3 mm plans, respectively. Maximum deviation for 2 mm plans was -0.3%. Clinical goals were met in 99.3% of both 2 and 3 mm plans. All dose differences were below 50 cGy except for 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a tailored QACT schedule based on beam trajectory and target location is supported, reducing unnecessary imaging without compromising treatment accuracy recommending a single QACT for all patients except those with targets traversing the sinuses or bulky surface targets. A 2 mm setup uncertainty was shown to provide robust target coverage while minimizing OAR dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"16 ","pages":"100751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Proton therapy offers superior conformality in cranial dose distributions, but its sensitivity to anatomical air-tissue interfaces and patient setup variations can compromise dosimetric robustness. Quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans can verify these changes, though they increase cumulative dose and workflow burden. There are currently gaps in knowledge about the setup uncertainty margin that could maintain acceptable daily target coverage, organ at risk (OAR) sparing, and QACT frequency requirements.

Materials and methods: A total of 122 adult patients treated for cranial targets between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were analyzed for adaptive planning rates based on if they had beams passing through the neck or not, and if beams passed through the nasal cavity or not. Twenty patients that did not have beams passing through the neck or nasal cavity were randomly selected and replanned using 2 mm setup uncertainty for robustness compared to the clinically utilized 3 mm setup uncertainty. Synthetic CTs were created for each daily cone beam CT, and the clinical goals were compared against the robustness expectations.

Results: Six patients had adaptive plans, only 2 of which were due to anatomical changes, and both of these patients had beams passing through the nasal cavity. Volumetric clinical goals for the clinical target volume (CTV) were met in 95.7% and 99.6% of 2 and 3 mm plans, respectively. Maximum deviation for 2 mm plans was -0.3%. Clinical goals were met in 99.3% of both 2 and 3 mm plans. All dose differences were below 50 cGy except for 1 patient.

Conclusion: The implementation of a tailored QACT schedule based on beam trajectory and target location is supported, reducing unnecessary imaging without compromising treatment accuracy recommending a single QACT for all patients except those with targets traversing the sinuses or bulky surface targets. A 2 mm setup uncertainty was shown to provide robust target coverage while minimizing OAR dose.

在保留正常组织的颅骨质子治疗中优化QACT频率和设置不确定性。
目的:质子治疗在颅脑剂量分布方面具有优越的一致性,但其对解剖空气-组织界面和患者设置变化的敏感性可能会损害剂量学的稳健性。质量保证计算机断层扫描(QACT)可以验证这些变化,尽管它们增加了累积剂量和工作流程负担。目前,关于设置不确定性范围的知识存在空白,该不确定性范围可以维持可接受的每日目标覆盖范围、风险器官(OAR)保留和QACT频率要求。材料与方法:回顾性分析2019年至2023年接受颅靶治疗的122例成人患者。病人的适应性计划率是根据他们的光束是否穿过颈部,以及光束是否穿过鼻腔来分析的。随机选择20名没有光束通过颈部或鼻腔的患者,与临床使用的3毫米设置不确定度相比,使用2mm设置不确定度对稳健性进行重新规划。为每个日常锥形束CT创建合成CT,并将临床目标与鲁棒性预期进行比较。结果:6例患者有适应性计划,其中2例是由于解剖改变,这2例患者都有光束穿过鼻腔。2和3 mm计划的临床目标体积(CTV)分别达到95.7%和99.6%。2mm平面的最大偏差为-0.3%。2 mm和3 mm方案均达到99.3%的临床目标。除1例外,其余剂量差异均在50 cGy以下。结论:支持基于光束轨迹和目标位置的定制QACT计划的实施,在不影响治疗准确性的情况下减少不必要的成像,推荐对所有患者进行单一QACT,除了目标穿过鼻窦或体积大的表面目标。2mm的设置不确定度可以在最小化桨叶剂量的同时提供强大的目标覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信