Gauze-soaked with suction wall: An alternative technique for negative pressure wound therapy.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001748
Rawan Alshammary, Rashed Alshatti, Hameed Humaid, Rahaf Alsubayti, Faris Sultan, Albadawi Hassan
{"title":"Gauze-soaked with suction wall: An alternative technique for negative pressure wound therapy.","authors":"Rawan Alshammary, Rashed Alshatti, Hameed Humaid, Rahaf Alsubayti, Faris Sultan, Albadawi Hassan","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) machines, such as vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) devices, can be prohibitively expensive for healthcare settings with limited resources. This study investigates the effectiveness of a cost-saving alternative-Gauze-Suction Under Continous (GSUC)-in promoting wound healing when standard NPWT devices are unavailable or unaffordable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four patients at Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia, underwent GSUC as part of their wound management under the plastic surgery unit. The primary outcome was the amount of granulation tissue generated, assessing wound readiness for skin grafting, primary closure, delayed primary closure, or secondary intention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four patients achieved more than 75% granulation tissue coverage in an average of 15.4 days. No wound-related or hospitalization-related complications were observed. Ultimately, all wounds were either successfully grafted or closed primarily. Patient satisfaction was high, and the estimated cost savings reached at least 45% compared with using conventional VAC devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GSUC is a viable, cost-effective alternative to standard VAC NPWT systems, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at significantly reduced expense. Its adoption may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings seeking to optimize wound care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"e001748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) machines, such as vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) devices, can be prohibitively expensive for healthcare settings with limited resources. This study investigates the effectiveness of a cost-saving alternative-Gauze-Suction Under Continous (GSUC)-in promoting wound healing when standard NPWT devices are unavailable or unaffordable.

Methods: Four patients at Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia, underwent GSUC as part of their wound management under the plastic surgery unit. The primary outcome was the amount of granulation tissue generated, assessing wound readiness for skin grafting, primary closure, delayed primary closure, or secondary intention.

Results: All four patients achieved more than 75% granulation tissue coverage in an average of 15.4 days. No wound-related or hospitalization-related complications were observed. Ultimately, all wounds were either successfully grafted or closed primarily. Patient satisfaction was high, and the estimated cost savings reached at least 45% compared with using conventional VAC devices.

Conclusion: GSUC is a viable, cost-effective alternative to standard VAC NPWT systems, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at significantly reduced expense. Its adoption may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings seeking to optimize wound care.

吸壁纱布浸泡:负压伤口治疗的另一种方法。
背景:传统的负压伤口治疗(NPWT)机器,如真空辅助闭合(VAC)设备,对于资源有限的医疗机构来说可能过于昂贵。本研究探讨了在标准NPWT设备不可用或负担不起的情况下,一种节省成本的替代方案——连续吸纱布(GSUC)在促进伤口愈合方面的有效性。方法:在沙特阿拉伯Al-Jouf的王子穆塔伊布·本·阿卜杜勒阿齐兹医院,4例患者接受了GSUC作为整形外科伤口处理的一部分。主要结果是产生肉芽组织的数量,评估皮肤移植的伤口准备情况、初次闭合、延迟初次闭合或二次意图。结果:所有4例患者在平均15.4天内实现了75%以上的肉芽组织覆盖率。未观察到与伤口或住院相关的并发症。最终,所有伤口要么成功移植,要么基本愈合。患者满意度很高,与使用传统VAC设备相比,估计成本节省至少达到45%。结论:GSUC是一种可行的、具有成本效益的替代标准VAC NPWT系统的方法,在显著降低费用的情况下取得了类似的临床结果。它的采用可能在资源有限的环境中寻求优化伤口护理特别有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信