Challenges in pain management and opioid prescribing practices following traumatic injury: a focus group study with orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeanette Finstad, Thomas Clausen, Olav Røise, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Ingrid Amalia Havnes
{"title":"Challenges in pain management and opioid prescribing practices following traumatic injury: a focus group study with orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners.","authors":"Jeanette Finstad, Thomas Clausen, Olav Røise, Leiv Arne Rosseland, Ingrid Amalia Havnes","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2517769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners (GPs) in providing pain management, focusing on opioid prescribing practices and follow-up care for trauma patients following orthopedic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted among 18 physicians, two among GPs and two among orthopedic trauma surgeons. Each group consisted of either specialist candidates or experienced specialists. The interviews explored experiences with follow-up care for orthopedic trauma patients, pain management, including opioid use and tapering, and were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes were identified: (1) Navigating post-discharge pain management, where GPs experienced problematic transfer of treatment responsibility and lack of opioid taper plans from the specialist health service. (2) A knowledge gap in pain management, with GPs reporting insufficient knowledge about opioid treatment, and orthopedic residents describing lacking systematic training in this area during specialization. (3) Changes in opioid prescribing practices over time, which had led to a self-perceived shift from liberal to restrictive prescription attitudes. (4) Unrealistic expectations of pain relief among patients were perceived by GPs and orthopedic surgeons throughout recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings reveal a knowledge gap in pain management, suggesting a need for enhanced education and training for GPs, both in specialization and specialist, and for orthopedic residents. This is crucial to meet the needs of trauma patients with severe orthopedic injuries and long-term pain. GPs need access to advisory support from the specialist healthcare system. These resources, including follow-up during challenging recovery phases, must be accessible to enhance patients care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2517769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experiences of orthopedic surgeons and general practitioners (GPs) in providing pain management, focusing on opioid prescribing practices and follow-up care for trauma patients following orthopedic injuries.

Methods: Four semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted among 18 physicians, two among GPs and two among orthopedic trauma surgeons. Each group consisted of either specialist candidates or experienced specialists. The interviews explored experiences with follow-up care for orthopedic trauma patients, pain management, including opioid use and tapering, and were thematically analyzed.

Results: Four main themes were identified: (1) Navigating post-discharge pain management, where GPs experienced problematic transfer of treatment responsibility and lack of opioid taper plans from the specialist health service. (2) A knowledge gap in pain management, with GPs reporting insufficient knowledge about opioid treatment, and orthopedic residents describing lacking systematic training in this area during specialization. (3) Changes in opioid prescribing practices over time, which had led to a self-perceived shift from liberal to restrictive prescription attitudes. (4) Unrealistic expectations of pain relief among patients were perceived by GPs and orthopedic surgeons throughout recovery.

Conclusions and implications: Our findings reveal a knowledge gap in pain management, suggesting a need for enhanced education and training for GPs, both in specialization and specialist, and for orthopedic residents. This is crucial to meet the needs of trauma patients with severe orthopedic injuries and long-term pain. GPs need access to advisory support from the specialist healthcare system. These resources, including follow-up during challenging recovery phases, must be accessible to enhance patients care.

创伤性损伤后疼痛管理和阿片类药物处方实践的挑战:骨科医生和全科医生的焦点小组研究。
目的:探讨骨科医生和全科医生(gp)在骨科损伤后创伤患者疼痛管理、阿片类药物处方实践和随访护理方面的经验。方法:对18名内科医生进行4次半结构化焦点小组访谈,其中2名为全科医生,2名为骨科创伤外科医生。每组由专家候选人或经验丰富的专家组成。访谈探讨了骨科创伤患者的随访护理经验,疼痛管理,包括阿片类药物的使用和逐渐减少,并进行了主题分析。结果:确定了四个主要主题:(1)导航出院后疼痛管理,其中全科医生经历了治疗责任转移问题和缺乏专业卫生服务的阿片类药物减少计划。(2)疼痛管理方面的知识差距,全科医生报告阿片类药物治疗知识不足,骨科住院医师描述在专业化过程中缺乏该领域的系统培训。(3)随着时间的推移,阿片类药物处方实践发生了变化,这导致了自我感知的处方态度从自由向限制转变。(4)在整个康复过程中,全科医生和骨科医生都认为患者对疼痛缓解的期望不切实际。结论和意义:我们的研究结果揭示了疼痛管理方面的知识差距,表明需要加强对全科医生的教育和培训,无论是专科还是专科,以及骨科住院医师。这对于满足严重骨科损伤和长期疼痛的创伤患者的需求至关重要。全科医生需要获得专业医疗保健系统的咨询支持。必须提供这些资源,包括在具有挑战性的恢复阶段的随访,以加强对患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信