Evaluating a Triage Screen in a Pediatric Emergency Department to Improve Appropriate Identification of Immigrant Populations.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Leen Bakdash, Amy Zeidan, Anna Q Yaffee
{"title":"Evaluating a Triage Screen in a Pediatric Emergency Department to Improve Appropriate Identification of Immigrant Populations.","authors":"Leen Bakdash, Amy Zeidan, Anna Q Yaffee","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>One in 4 children in the United States is part of an immigrant family. Children in immigrant families (CIFs) experience significant disparities in health care quality and access in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Insufficient utilization of interpreters for those with non-English language preference contributes to these disparities. CIFs are often excluded from clinical research studies, impairing efforts to improve their health care access. We evaluated an immigration and language triage screen in a PED to better identify CIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of attitudes toward a triage screen identifying country of origin and language preference. Caregivers who entered the assessment/triage room of an urban PED were asked about the caregiver's and child's country of birth, year of arrival to the US, and preferred language. Patients who were born outside the United States or had a caregiver born outside the United States were identified as CIF. Caregivers of CIF were asked to participate in a survey to understand their attitudes toward the screen. Demographics and attitudes toward the triage screen were then analyzed using basic descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CIF were identified in 252 or 21.9% of screened encounters. In 51.2% (n=129) of these encounters, caregivers completed a survey. Ninety-two percent of surveyed families were comfortable with the triage screen. In contrast, almost one third of families endorsed that they would have felt uncomfortable had they been asked their immigration status directly. Eighteen percent of families who needed an interpreter did not have this need identified until after the triage screen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that a language and immigration triage screen in a PED is feasible and acceptable to improve the identification of CIF and their language needs in electronic medical records with the goal of improving the quality of health care and research for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: One in 4 children in the United States is part of an immigrant family. Children in immigrant families (CIFs) experience significant disparities in health care quality and access in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Insufficient utilization of interpreters for those with non-English language preference contributes to these disparities. CIFs are often excluded from clinical research studies, impairing efforts to improve their health care access. We evaluated an immigration and language triage screen in a PED to better identify CIF.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of attitudes toward a triage screen identifying country of origin and language preference. Caregivers who entered the assessment/triage room of an urban PED were asked about the caregiver's and child's country of birth, year of arrival to the US, and preferred language. Patients who were born outside the United States or had a caregiver born outside the United States were identified as CIF. Caregivers of CIF were asked to participate in a survey to understand their attitudes toward the screen. Demographics and attitudes toward the triage screen were then analyzed using basic descriptive statistics.

Results: CIF were identified in 252 or 21.9% of screened encounters. In 51.2% (n=129) of these encounters, caregivers completed a survey. Ninety-two percent of surveyed families were comfortable with the triage screen. In contrast, almost one third of families endorsed that they would have felt uncomfortable had they been asked their immigration status directly. Eighteen percent of families who needed an interpreter did not have this need identified until after the triage screen.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a language and immigration triage screen in a PED is feasible and acceptable to improve the identification of CIF and their language needs in electronic medical records with the goal of improving the quality of health care and research for this population.

评估儿科急诊科的分诊筛选以提高对移民人群的适当识别。
目标:在美国,每四个孩子中就有一个来自移民家庭。移民家庭(CIFs)的儿童在儿科急诊科(PED)的卫生保健质量和可及性方面存在显著差异。对于那些非英语语言偏好的人来说,口译员的使用不足导致了这些差异。残疾患者经常被排除在临床研究之外,妨碍了改善其获得保健服务的努力。我们评估了PED的移民和语言分类筛选,以更好地识别CIF。方法:我们对鉴别原籍国和语言偏好的分类筛选态度进行了横断面分析。进入城市PED评估/分诊室的护理人员被问及护理人员和孩子的出生国家、抵达美国的年份和首选语言。在美国境外出生的患者或有在美国境外出生的护理人员的患者被确定为CIF。CIF护理人员被要求参与一项调查,以了解他们对屏幕的态度。然后使用基本描述性统计分析人口统计学和对分诊屏幕的态度。结果:在252例或21.9%的筛查病例中发现了CIF。其中51.2% (n=129)的护理人员完成了一项调查。92%的被调查家庭对分诊屏幕感到满意。相比之下,近三分之一的家庭表示,如果直接询问他们的移民身份,他们会感到不舒服。在需要翻译的家庭中,有18%的家庭在经过分诊筛查后才发现有这种需要。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在PED中进行语言和移民分类筛选是可行和可接受的,可以改善电子病历中CIF及其语言需求的识别,以提高该人群的医疗保健和研究质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信