Patient Experience of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Qualitative Patient and Clinician Interviews Informing the Development of a Conceptual Model.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jeffrey L Bennett, Asha Paireddy, Charlotte Cox, Megan Mayhew, Julia Stein, Teresa Gasalla, Béatrice Tugaut
{"title":"Patient Experience of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Qualitative Patient and Clinician Interviews Informing the Development of a Conceptual Model.","authors":"Jeffrey L Bennett, Asha Paireddy, Charlotte Cox, Megan Mayhew, Julia Stein, Teresa Gasalla, Béatrice Tugaut","doi":"10.1007/s40120-025-00770-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a rare, autoimmune demyelinating central nervous system disease. Currently, little is known about the signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of MOGAD from the patient perspective. This study explored the patient experience of MOGAD through concept elicitation interviews with patients with MOGAD and clinicians to develop a conceptual model of MOGAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary conceptual model of MOGAD signs, symptoms, treatments, and HRQoL impacts was developed based on a review of the published literature. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients and clinicians was used to develop the final conceptual model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients with MOGAD and two clinicians were interviewed. The most common patient-reported symptoms were eye pain, fatigue, body aches/pain, headaches, and blurred vision. Eye pain and body aches/pain were reported as the most bothersome symptoms and most important to improve with treatment. The HRQoL impacts most commonly reported by patients were difficulty with carrying out household chores, inability to work, depression, and difficulty walking. Impacts on work/school were considered by patients as the most bothersome to their HRQoL and the most important to resolve. Following the interviews, a final conceptual model was produced that reported 32 symptoms across seven domains (constitutional; visual; general neurological; sensory-motor neurological; genitourinary; gastrointestinal; and chest-related, respiratory, and throat) and 50 HRQoL impacts across eight domains (emotional wellbeing, activities of daily living, physical functioning, social functioning, work/school, cognitive functioning, sleep, and financial).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides important insights into the patient experience of MOGAD from patient and clinician perspectives, highlighting the underappreciated burden of the disease. The final conceptual model demonstrates the heterogeneity of MOGAD symptoms and their impact on patients' HRQoL. Future treatment trials should consider including appropriate measures to evaluate the key symptoms and HRQoL impacts identified in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-025-00770-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a rare, autoimmune demyelinating central nervous system disease. Currently, little is known about the signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of MOGAD from the patient perspective. This study explored the patient experience of MOGAD through concept elicitation interviews with patients with MOGAD and clinicians to develop a conceptual model of MOGAD.

Methods: A preliminary conceptual model of MOGAD signs, symptoms, treatments, and HRQoL impacts was developed based on a review of the published literature. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients and clinicians was used to develop the final conceptual model.

Results: Twelve patients with MOGAD and two clinicians were interviewed. The most common patient-reported symptoms were eye pain, fatigue, body aches/pain, headaches, and blurred vision. Eye pain and body aches/pain were reported as the most bothersome symptoms and most important to improve with treatment. The HRQoL impacts most commonly reported by patients were difficulty with carrying out household chores, inability to work, depression, and difficulty walking. Impacts on work/school were considered by patients as the most bothersome to their HRQoL and the most important to resolve. Following the interviews, a final conceptual model was produced that reported 32 symptoms across seven domains (constitutional; visual; general neurological; sensory-motor neurological; genitourinary; gastrointestinal; and chest-related, respiratory, and throat) and 50 HRQoL impacts across eight domains (emotional wellbeing, activities of daily living, physical functioning, social functioning, work/school, cognitive functioning, sleep, and financial).

Conclusions: This study provides important insights into the patient experience of MOGAD from patient and clinician perspectives, highlighting the underappreciated burden of the disease. The final conceptual model demonstrates the heterogeneity of MOGAD symptoms and their impact on patients' HRQoL. Future treatment trials should consider including appropriate measures to evaluate the key symptoms and HRQoL impacts identified in this study.

髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病的患者经历:定性的患者和临床医生访谈,为概念模型的发展提供信息。
髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病(MOGAD)是一种罕见的自身免疫性脱髓鞘中枢神经系统疾病。目前,从患者的角度对MOGAD的体征、症状和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响知之甚少。本研究通过对MOGAD患者和临床医生的概念启发访谈来探讨MOGAD的患者体验,以建立MOGAD的概念模型。方法:在回顾已发表文献的基础上,建立了MOGAD体征、症状、治疗和HRQoL影响的初步概念模型。对患者和临床医生进行半结构化访谈的专题分析用于开发最终的概念模型。结果:对12例MOGAD患者和2名临床医生进行了访谈。患者报告的最常见症状是眼痛、疲劳、身体疼痛、头痛和视力模糊。据报道,眼睛疼痛和身体疼痛是最令人烦恼的症状,最重要的是通过治疗来改善。患者最常报告的HRQoL影响是难以完成家务、无法工作、抑郁和行走困难。患者认为对工作/学习的影响是对他们的HRQoL最麻烦的,也是最重要的。在访谈之后,产生了一个最终的概念模型,报告了七个领域(体质;视觉;一般的神经;感觉神经;泌尿生殖器的;肠胃;和胸部相关,呼吸和喉咙)和50 HRQoL影响八个领域(情绪健康,日常生活活动,身体功能,社会功能,工作/学校,认知功能,睡眠和财务)。结论:本研究从患者和临床医生的角度提供了对MOGAD患者体验的重要见解,突出了未被重视的疾病负担。最后的概念模型证明了MOGAD症状的异质性及其对患者HRQoL的影响。未来的治疗试验应考虑纳入适当的措施来评估本研究确定的关键症状和HRQoL影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信