Volume and Intensity of Walking and Risk of Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rayane Haddadj, Anne Lovise Nordstoga, Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen, Eivind Schjelderup Skarpsno, Atle Kongsvold, Mats Flaaten, Jasper Schipperijn, Kerstin Bach, Paul Jarle Mork
{"title":"Volume and Intensity of Walking and Risk of Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Rayane Haddadj, Anne Lovise Nordstoga, Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen, Eivind Schjelderup Skarpsno, Atle Kongsvold, Mats Flaaten, Jasper Schipperijn, Kerstin Bach, Paul Jarle Mork","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and costly condition, and regular physical activity may reduce its risk. Walking is a common and accessible form of physical activity, but its association with the risk of chronic LBP is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether accelerometer-derived daily walking volume and walking intensity are associated with the risk of chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective population-based cohort study used data from the Trøndelag Health (HUNT) Study in Norway, with a baseline in 2017 to 2019 and follow-up in 2021 to 2023. The study included individuals without chronic LBP at baseline and with at least 1 valid day of device-measured walking.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Daily walking volume (minutes per day) and walking intensity, expressed as metabolic equivalent of task (MET) per minute.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was self-reported chronic LBP at follow-up, defined as pain lasting 3 months or longer in the past 12 months. Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of chronic LBP according to daily walking volume and mean walking intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 194 participants aged 20 years or older (mean [SD] age, 55.3 [15.1] years; 6564 women [58.6%]) were included in the analysis. At follow-up (mean [SD] follow-up time, 4.2 [0.3] years), 1659 participants (14.8%) reported chronic LBP. Continuous measures of both walking volume and walking intensity were inversely associated with the risk of chronic LBP using restricted cubic splines models. Compared with participants walking less than 78 minutes per day, those walking 78 to 100 minutes per day had an RR for chronic LBP of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98), those walking 101 to 124 minutes per day had an RR of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.87), and those walking 125 minutes or more per day had an RR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87). Compared with a mean walking intensity of less than 3.00 MET per minute, participants with walking intensity of 3.00 to 3.11 MET per minute had an RR for chronic LBP of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96), those with walking intensity of 3.12 to 3.26 MET per minute had an RR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93), and those with walking intensity greater than or equal to 3.27 MET per minute had an RR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93). After mutual adjustment, the association remained largely similar for walking volume but was attenuated for walking intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, daily walking volume and walking intensity were inversely associated with the risk of chronic LBP. The findings suggest that walking volume may have a more pronounced benefit than walking intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 6","pages":"e2515592"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and costly condition, and regular physical activity may reduce its risk. Walking is a common and accessible form of physical activity, but its association with the risk of chronic LBP is unclear.

Objective: To examine whether accelerometer-derived daily walking volume and walking intensity are associated with the risk of chronic LBP.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective population-based cohort study used data from the Trøndelag Health (HUNT) Study in Norway, with a baseline in 2017 to 2019 and follow-up in 2021 to 2023. The study included individuals without chronic LBP at baseline and with at least 1 valid day of device-measured walking.

Exposure: Daily walking volume (minutes per day) and walking intensity, expressed as metabolic equivalent of task (MET) per minute.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was self-reported chronic LBP at follow-up, defined as pain lasting 3 months or longer in the past 12 months. Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of chronic LBP according to daily walking volume and mean walking intensity.

Results: A total of 11 194 participants aged 20 years or older (mean [SD] age, 55.3 [15.1] years; 6564 women [58.6%]) were included in the analysis. At follow-up (mean [SD] follow-up time, 4.2 [0.3] years), 1659 participants (14.8%) reported chronic LBP. Continuous measures of both walking volume and walking intensity were inversely associated with the risk of chronic LBP using restricted cubic splines models. Compared with participants walking less than 78 minutes per day, those walking 78 to 100 minutes per day had an RR for chronic LBP of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98), those walking 101 to 124 minutes per day had an RR of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.87), and those walking 125 minutes or more per day had an RR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87). Compared with a mean walking intensity of less than 3.00 MET per minute, participants with walking intensity of 3.00 to 3.11 MET per minute had an RR for chronic LBP of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96), those with walking intensity of 3.12 to 3.26 MET per minute had an RR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93), and those with walking intensity greater than or equal to 3.27 MET per minute had an RR of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93). After mutual adjustment, the association remained largely similar for walking volume but was attenuated for walking intensity.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, daily walking volume and walking intensity were inversely associated with the risk of chronic LBP. The findings suggest that walking volume may have a more pronounced benefit than walking intensity.

步行量和强度与慢性腰痛的风险。
重要性:慢性腰痛(LBP)是一种普遍且昂贵的疾病,有规律的体育活动可以降低其风险。步行是一种常见且容易获得的身体活动形式,但其与慢性腰痛风险的关系尚不清楚。目的:探讨由加速度计得出的每日步行量和步行强度是否与慢性腰痛的风险相关。设计、环境和参与者:这项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究使用了挪威Trøndelag Health (HUNT)研究的数据,基线为2017年至2019年,随访时间为2021年至2023年。该研究包括基线时无慢性腰痛且至少有1天有效步行的个体。暴露:每日步行量(每天分钟)和步行强度,以每分钟代谢当量(MET)表示。主要结局和测量:主要结局是随访时自我报告的慢性腰痛,定义为过去12个月内疼痛持续3个月或更长时间。根据每日步行量和平均步行强度,使用泊松回归估计慢性腰痛的校正风险比(rr), 95% ci。结果:共有11194名20岁及以上的参与者(平均[SD]年龄55.3[15.1]岁;6564名女性(58.6%)被纳入分析。在随访中(平均[SD]随访时间4.2[0.3]年),1659名参与者(14.8%)报告慢性腰痛。使用受限三次样条模型,连续测量步行量和步行强度与慢性腰痛的风险呈负相关。与每天步行少于78分钟的参与者相比,每天步行78至100分钟的参与者慢性腰痛的RR为0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98),每天步行101至124分钟的参与者的RR为0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.87),每天步行125分钟或更长时间的参与者的RR为0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87)。与平均步行强度低于3.00 MET /分钟的参与者相比,步行强度为3.00至3.11 MET /分钟的参与者慢性LBP的RR为0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96),步行强度为3.12至3.26 MET /分钟的参与者的RR为0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93),步行强度大于或等于3.27 MET /分钟的参与者的RR为0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93)。相互调整后,步行量与步行强度之间的相关性大致相似,但步行强度与步行强度之间的相关性减弱。结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,每日步行量和步行强度与慢性腰痛的风险呈负相关。研究结果表明,步行量可能比步行强度有更明显的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信