Stephanie A. Zajac PhD, MS (is an Organizational Psychologist and Senior Leadership Practitioner, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.), Kimberly N. Williams PhD (is an Instructor of Record, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida.), Sabina M. Patel MS (is a PhD Candidate, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Elizabeth H. Lazzara PhD, MA (is an Associate Professor, Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Joe R. Keebler PhD, MA (is a Professor, Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Mark W. Clemens MD, MBA, FACS (is a Surgeon and Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.), Courtney L. Holladay PhD, MA (is the Associate Vice President, Leadership Institute, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Please address correspondence to Courtney L. Holladay)
{"title":"Understanding Psychological Safety in Health Care: A Qualitative Investigation and Practical Guidance","authors":"Stephanie A. Zajac PhD, MS (is an Organizational Psychologist and Senior Leadership Practitioner, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.), Kimberly N. Williams PhD (is an Instructor of Record, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida.), Sabina M. Patel MS (is a PhD Candidate, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Elizabeth H. Lazzara PhD, MA (is an Associate Professor, Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Joe R. Keebler PhD, MA (is a Professor, Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.), Mark W. Clemens MD, MBA, FACS (is a Surgeon and Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.), Courtney L. Holladay PhD, MA (is the Associate Vice President, Leadership Institute, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Please address correspondence to Courtney L. Holladay)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychological safety is a critical teamwork competency that promotes effective communication, teamwork, patient safety, and the well-being of health care professionals. However, previous research on barriers and facilitators to promotion of psychological safety has focused mainly on clinical staff, omitting other health care disciplines that contribute to patient safety and high-quality care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors conducted a qualitative study in one health system to identify barriers and facilitators to psychological safety in the workplace. Participants in a quality improvement (QI) initiative were invited through automated e-mails sent via the Qualtrics platform to participate in this survey. Employees self-selected whether to respond, as participation was not required as part of the QI initiative engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 429 participants across 19 departments spanning administration, education, research, and clinical areas were invited. The average survey response rate across departments was 52.2%. Participants answered two open-ended questions: (1) “What are situations where it can be difficult to take an interpersonal risk and speak up [on this team]?” and (2) “What are the challenges to creating psychological safety within your current team?” Three psychological safety subject matter experts coded the data to extract factors and subthemes. Thematic factors at the individual, team, and organization level were uncovered. Sixteen subcategories of factors that affect psychological safety emerged, uncovering two implications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Psychological safety as defined here includes not just team level but the individual and organization levels. Interventions must align with the factors at all three levels for a personalized and comprehensive approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 9","pages":"Pages 534-547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725025001400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Psychological safety is a critical teamwork competency that promotes effective communication, teamwork, patient safety, and the well-being of health care professionals. However, previous research on barriers and facilitators to promotion of psychological safety has focused mainly on clinical staff, omitting other health care disciplines that contribute to patient safety and high-quality care.
Methods
The authors conducted a qualitative study in one health system to identify barriers and facilitators to psychological safety in the workplace. Participants in a quality improvement (QI) initiative were invited through automated e-mails sent via the Qualtrics platform to participate in this survey. Employees self-selected whether to respond, as participation was not required as part of the QI initiative engagement.
Results
A total of 429 participants across 19 departments spanning administration, education, research, and clinical areas were invited. The average survey response rate across departments was 52.2%. Participants answered two open-ended questions: (1) “What are situations where it can be difficult to take an interpersonal risk and speak up [on this team]?” and (2) “What are the challenges to creating psychological safety within your current team?” Three psychological safety subject matter experts coded the data to extract factors and subthemes. Thematic factors at the individual, team, and organization level were uncovered. Sixteen subcategories of factors that affect psychological safety emerged, uncovering two implications.
Conclusion
Psychological safety as defined here includes not just team level but the individual and organization levels. Interventions must align with the factors at all three levels for a personalized and comprehensive approach.