Problem-based learning in radiology achieves similar results in classroom and metaverse settings.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Teodoro Rudolphi-Solero, Fernando Bajos-Ariza, Rocío Lorenzo-Álvarez, Dolores Domínguez-Pinos, Miguel José Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco Sendra-Portero
{"title":"Problem-based learning in radiology achieves similar results in classroom and metaverse settings.","authors":"Teodoro Rudolphi-Solero, Fernando Bajos-Ariza, Rocío Lorenzo-Álvarez, Dolores Domínguez-Pinos, Miguel José Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco Sendra-Portero","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01987-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The metaverse (MV) is a simulated virtual world enabling simultaneous interaction and communication between students, teachers, and colleagues. This study compared a problem-based learning experience in radiology conducted face-to-face in real life (RL) and within the MV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During a radiology clinical rotation, groups of approximately 25 sixth-year medical students participated over 2 years in real life and 2 years in the MV. Each group was divided into eight teams of 3-4 students, each assigned a radiological clinical case for study, presentation, and debate with classmates. Students evaluated other teams, assessed case difficulty, and completed a perception questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 348 students participated in the real-life group and 342 in the MV group, with average teacher evaluation scores of 8.11 ± 1.15 and 7.97 ± 1.54, respectively, showing no significant differences (p = 0.883). No significant differences were found in peer evaluations or case difficulty assessments. Both groups reported positive experiences, with overall satisfaction scores out of 10 points being 7.91 ± 1.32 for RL and 7.54 ± 1.87 for the MV, without significant differences (p = 0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Problem-based learning activities in radiology can be effectively conducted in the MV, yielding academic results and experiential perceptions comparable to RL. The MV presents a viable alternative to face-to-face learning when in-person problem-based learning activities are impractical or challenging.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>This study highlights the potential of the metaverse for effectively conducting radiology problem-based learning activities. It provides evidence for its viability as an alternative educational tool, particularly when face-to-face learning is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Radiology problem-based learning in the metaverse achieved academic results comparable to traditional real-life classroom settings. The metaverse offers unique learning advantages, including remote access, 24/7 availability, and teamwork opportunities. The metaverse provides an excellent problem-based learning alternative when in-person activities are impractical or impossible.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01987-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The metaverse (MV) is a simulated virtual world enabling simultaneous interaction and communication between students, teachers, and colleagues. This study compared a problem-based learning experience in radiology conducted face-to-face in real life (RL) and within the MV.

Methods: During a radiology clinical rotation, groups of approximately 25 sixth-year medical students participated over 2 years in real life and 2 years in the MV. Each group was divided into eight teams of 3-4 students, each assigned a radiological clinical case for study, presentation, and debate with classmates. Students evaluated other teams, assessed case difficulty, and completed a perception questionnaire.

Results: A total of 348 students participated in the real-life group and 342 in the MV group, with average teacher evaluation scores of 8.11 ± 1.15 and 7.97 ± 1.54, respectively, showing no significant differences (p = 0.883). No significant differences were found in peer evaluations or case difficulty assessments. Both groups reported positive experiences, with overall satisfaction scores out of 10 points being 7.91 ± 1.32 for RL and 7.54 ± 1.87 for the MV, without significant differences (p = 0.073).

Conclusions: Problem-based learning activities in radiology can be effectively conducted in the MV, yielding academic results and experiential perceptions comparable to RL. The MV presents a viable alternative to face-to-face learning when in-person problem-based learning activities are impractical or challenging.

Critical relevance statement: This study highlights the potential of the metaverse for effectively conducting radiology problem-based learning activities. It provides evidence for its viability as an alternative educational tool, particularly when face-to-face learning is not feasible.

Key points: Radiology problem-based learning in the metaverse achieved academic results comparable to traditional real-life classroom settings. The metaverse offers unique learning advantages, including remote access, 24/7 availability, and teamwork opportunities. The metaverse provides an excellent problem-based learning alternative when in-person activities are impractical or impossible.

放射学中基于问题的学习在课堂和虚拟环境中取得了类似的结果。
目的:虚拟世界(MV)是一个模拟的虚拟世界,使学生、教师和同事之间能够同时进行互动和交流。本研究比较了在现实生活中面对面(RL)和在MV中进行的基于问题的放射学学习经验。方法:在放射学临床轮转期间,大约25名六年级医学生参加了2年的现实生活和2年的MV。每个小组分为8个小组,每组3-4名学生,每个小组分配一个放射学临床病例进行研究、报告和与同学辩论。学生们评估其他团队,评估案例难度,并完成一份感知问卷。结果:现实生活组348名学生参加,MV组342名学生参加,教师评价平均分分别为8.11±1.15分和7.97±1.54分,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.883)。在同侪评估或个案难度评估方面,没有发现显著差异。两组均报告了积极的体验,RL的总体满意度得分为7.91±1.32,MV的总体满意度得分为7.54±1.87,总分为10分,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.073)。结论:基于问题的放射学学习活动可以在MV中有效地进行,产生与RL相当的学术成果和经验感知。当面对面的基于问题的学习活动不切实际或具有挑战性时,MV提供了面对面学习的可行替代方案。关键相关性声明:本研究强调了meta在有效开展放射学基于问题的学习活动方面的潜力。它为其作为一种替代教育工具的可行性提供了证据,特别是在面对面学习不可行的情况下。关键点:放射学基于问题的学习在元宇宙中取得了与传统现实生活课堂环境相当的学术成果。虚拟世界提供了独特的学习优势,包括远程访问、24/7可用性和团队合作机会。当面对面的活动不切实际或不可能时,虚拟世界提供了一个极好的基于问题的学习选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信