The Usability of Neurological Occupational Therapy Case Studies Generated by ChatGPT.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Si-An Lee, Jin-Hyuck Park
{"title":"The Usability of Neurological Occupational Therapy Case Studies Generated by ChatGPT.","authors":"Si-An Lee, Jin-Hyuck Park","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13111341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Case-based learning is essential in occupational therapy education, but developing standardized cases requires significant resources. This study explores the usability of AI-generated case studies using ChatGPT. <b>Methods</b>: A four-stage process was applied: (1) prompt development based on existing frameworks, (2) case generation ensuring diversity and relevance, (3) expert evaluation using a 5-point Likert scale, and (4) data analysis. Five neurological cases were generated and reviewed by ten experts. <b>Results</b>: Experts rated the cases highly in clinical realism (4.22/5), information comprehensiveness (4.56/5), and educational value (4.44/5). The AI-generated cases successfully provided structured occupational therapy scenarios, assessment results, and clinical questions. <b>Conclusions</b>: Five AI-generated occupational therapy cases were developed and reviewed by occupational therapy experts to evaluate their clinical realism, comprehensiveness, and educational value. While expert feedback was favorable, the effectiveness of these cases for student learning has not yet been empirically tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12155196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Case-based learning is essential in occupational therapy education, but developing standardized cases requires significant resources. This study explores the usability of AI-generated case studies using ChatGPT. Methods: A four-stage process was applied: (1) prompt development based on existing frameworks, (2) case generation ensuring diversity and relevance, (3) expert evaluation using a 5-point Likert scale, and (4) data analysis. Five neurological cases were generated and reviewed by ten experts. Results: Experts rated the cases highly in clinical realism (4.22/5), information comprehensiveness (4.56/5), and educational value (4.44/5). The AI-generated cases successfully provided structured occupational therapy scenarios, assessment results, and clinical questions. Conclusions: Five AI-generated occupational therapy cases were developed and reviewed by occupational therapy experts to evaluate their clinical realism, comprehensiveness, and educational value. While expert feedback was favorable, the effectiveness of these cases for student learning has not yet been empirically tested.

由ChatGPT生成的神经系统职业治疗案例研究的可用性。
背景/目的:基于案例的学习在职业治疗教育中是必不可少的,但是开发标准化的案例需要大量的资源。本研究探讨了使用ChatGPT的人工智能生成案例研究的可用性。方法:采用四个阶段的过程:(1)基于现有框架的快速开发,(2)确保多样性和相关性的案例生成,(3)使用5点李克特量表的专家评估,(4)数据分析。由10位专家对5例神经学病例进行了综述。结果:专家对病例的临床现实性(4.22/5)、信息综合性(4.56/5)、教育价值(4.44/5)评价较高。人工智能生成的病例成功地提供了结构化的职业治疗方案、评估结果和临床问题。结论:本研究开发了5个人工智能生成的职业治疗案例,并由职业治疗专家对其临床现实性、全面性和教育价值进行了评估。虽然专家的反馈是有利的,但这些案例对学生学习的有效性尚未得到实证检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信