{"title":"Cultural Humility Training in Mental Health Service Provision: A Scoping Review of the Foundational and Conceptual Literature.","authors":"Mayio Konidaris, Melissa Petrakis","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13111342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ongoing access and equity concerns for culturally diverse populations in mental health warrant a shift from cultural competence to cultural humility training. This review aimed to systematically assess the breadth of conceptual and training literature in peer-reviewed publications drawn from PsycINFO, CINAHL plus, Google Scholar and Scopus, from 2007-2018, utilizing <i>cultural humility</i> as the key search term and its relevance to service provision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This method utilized a five-stage scoping review framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results were that a total of 246 publications were extracted. Following employing an abstract review method and removing duplicates, this resulted in a full-text review of 56 publications. The emerging themes included the following: culturally informed conceptual frameworks; culturally diverse training approaches; racial inequalities in mental health services; culturally informed national and international perspectives; race and international transcultural mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conclusions were that including cultural humility principles in service provision and training enables greater self-awareness towards racial bias and negative cultural stereotypes at both practice and organizational levels, ultimately aimed at enhancing mental health service provision by mitigating the structural barriers encountered by service users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12155312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ongoing access and equity concerns for culturally diverse populations in mental health warrant a shift from cultural competence to cultural humility training. This review aimed to systematically assess the breadth of conceptual and training literature in peer-reviewed publications drawn from PsycINFO, CINAHL plus, Google Scholar and Scopus, from 2007-2018, utilizing cultural humility as the key search term and its relevance to service provision.
Methods: This method utilized a five-stage scoping review framework.
Results: Results were that a total of 246 publications were extracted. Following employing an abstract review method and removing duplicates, this resulted in a full-text review of 56 publications. The emerging themes included the following: culturally informed conceptual frameworks; culturally diverse training approaches; racial inequalities in mental health services; culturally informed national and international perspectives; race and international transcultural mental health.
Conclusions: Conclusions were that including cultural humility principles in service provision and training enables greater self-awareness towards racial bias and negative cultural stereotypes at both practice and organizational levels, ultimately aimed at enhancing mental health service provision by mitigating the structural barriers encountered by service users.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.