Primary care insights on the management of diabetes: results from a mixed method study of care changes and impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Karla Freeman, Shuaib Hafid, Dee Mangin, Andrea Carruthers, Meredith Vanstone, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Jennifer Lawson, Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Kathryn Nicholson, Neil Drummond, John A Queenan, Michelle Howard
{"title":"Primary care insights on the management of diabetes: results from a mixed method study of care changes and impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Karla Freeman, Shuaib Hafid, Dee Mangin, Andrea Carruthers, Meredith Vanstone, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Jennifer Lawson, Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Kathryn Nicholson, Neil Drummond, John A Queenan, Michelle Howard","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Canada, primary care manages most diabetes care. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted primary care, reducing access to care and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to describe changes in diabetes monitoring during the first 21 months of the pandemic, patients' experiences with these changes, and impact on HbA1c and blood pressure (BP) control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-phase mixed methods study: (i) A retrospective pre-post cohort study using de-identified electronic medical record data to compare HbA1c and BP measurement frequency and results in diabetic patients prepandemic (22 June 2018 to 12 March 2020) and during the pandemic (13 March 2020 to 3 December 2021); (ii) A qualitative descriptive analysis using semistructured interviews to understand patient experiences navigating diabetes care during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 84 617 patients with validated diabetes case definition. Proportion of patients with <1 HbA1c test increased by 10% during the pandemic. For those with ≥1 test, mean HbA1c remained unchanged [mean (SD) HbA1cPre: 7.2 (1.3); HbA1cDuring: 7.2 (1.3); P = .51]. Proportion of patients with <1 BP measurement increased by 23%. For those with ≥1 measurement, mean BP remained clinically similar [mean (SD) sBPPre: 131.8 (13.7); sBPDuring: 132.9 (15.2); P < .01. Mean dBPPre: 74.9 (8.6); dBPDuring: 75.1 (9.1); P = .63]. Nineteen participants were interviewed, discussing virtual care, challenges with self-monitoring, and self-management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mean HbA1c and BP values remained clinically stable during the pandemic despite reductions in monitoring frequency, likely due to continuity of care and patient self-management. Future research should evaluate a de-intensified frequency of diabetes monitoring and address care gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Canada, primary care manages most diabetes care. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted primary care, reducing access to care and monitoring.

Objectives: We aim to describe changes in diabetes monitoring during the first 21 months of the pandemic, patients' experiences with these changes, and impact on HbA1c and blood pressure (BP) control.

Methods: We conducted a two-phase mixed methods study: (i) A retrospective pre-post cohort study using de-identified electronic medical record data to compare HbA1c and BP measurement frequency and results in diabetic patients prepandemic (22 June 2018 to 12 March 2020) and during the pandemic (13 March 2020 to 3 December 2021); (ii) A qualitative descriptive analysis using semistructured interviews to understand patient experiences navigating diabetes care during the pandemic.

Results: The cohort included 84 617 patients with validated diabetes case definition. Proportion of patients with <1 HbA1c test increased by 10% during the pandemic. For those with ≥1 test, mean HbA1c remained unchanged [mean (SD) HbA1cPre: 7.2 (1.3); HbA1cDuring: 7.2 (1.3); P = .51]. Proportion of patients with <1 BP measurement increased by 23%. For those with ≥1 measurement, mean BP remained clinically similar [mean (SD) sBPPre: 131.8 (13.7); sBPDuring: 132.9 (15.2); P < .01. Mean dBPPre: 74.9 (8.6); dBPDuring: 75.1 (9.1); P = .63]. Nineteen participants were interviewed, discussing virtual care, challenges with self-monitoring, and self-management strategies.

Conclusions: Mean HbA1c and BP values remained clinically stable during the pandemic despite reductions in monitoring frequency, likely due to continuity of care and patient self-management. Future research should evaluate a de-intensified frequency of diabetes monitoring and address care gaps.

初级保健对糖尿病管理的见解:COVID-19大流行期间护理变化和影响的混合方法研究结果
背景:在加拿大,初级保健管理着大多数糖尿病护理。COVID-19大流行扰乱了初级保健,减少了获得护理和监测的机会。目的:我们旨在描述大流行前21个月糖尿病监测的变化,患者经历这些变化,以及对HbA1c和血压控制的影响。方法:我们进行了一项两阶段混合方法研究:(i)使用去识别电子病历数据进行回顾性前后队列研究,比较糖尿病患者在大流行前(2018年6月22日至2020年3月12日)和大流行期间(2020年3月13日至2021年12月3日)的糖化血红蛋白和血压测量频率和结果;㈡采用半结构化访谈进行定性描述性分析,以了解大流行期间患者在糖尿病护理方面的经验。结果:该队列包括84 617例确诊的糖尿病患者。结论:在大流行期间,尽管监测频率减少,但平均HbA1c和BP值在临床上保持稳定,这可能是由于连续性的护理和患者自我管理。未来的研究应评估糖尿病监测频率的降低,并解决护理差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信