Evaluating the Efficacy of 0.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Disinfection for Microbial Control in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital's Burns and Plastics Unit.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Collins Amponsah, Emmanuel U Osisiogu, Mark Addy, Philip Asumang, Frank Kwasikumah, Enid Owusu
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of 0.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Disinfection for Microbial Control in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital's Burns and Plastics Unit.","authors":"Collins Amponsah, Emmanuel U Osisiogu, Mark Addy, Philip Asumang, Frank Kwasikumah, Enid Owusu","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v35i2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise in nosocomial infections, also known as healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), has led to widespread illness and fatalities, affecting both patients and healthcare workers. This surge is a result of inadequate disinfection practices. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 5% disinfectant on microbial contamination in the Burns Unit of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Swab samples were collected from surfaces such as working benches, door handles, sinks, taps, and trolleys in the Burns Unit of KBTH before and after routine disinfection. The samples were cultured on Blood agar and MacConkey agar. Standard bacteriological techniques, including Gram staining and biochemical tests, were used to identify the isolated bacteria. The isolates were then tested against prepared dilutions of the bleach disinfectant used in the Burns Unit. Additionally, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of sodium hypochlorite against the isolates were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in microbial load before and after routine disinfection for most sampled surfaces (p > 0.05), except for air-exposed plates. The isolated organisms included Staphylococcus aureus, coagulasenegative staphylococci, Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Citrobacter freundii. While the working solution showed no inhibition zones, laboratory testing confirmed that a properly prepared 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was effective against all isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that the bioburden remained high after routine disinfection. A 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution (1:10 dilution of the 5% stock) was effective in eliminating all isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"35 2","pages":"101-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v35i2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rise in nosocomial infections, also known as healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), has led to widespread illness and fatalities, affecting both patients and healthcare workers. This surge is a result of inadequate disinfection practices. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 5% disinfectant on microbial contamination in the Burns Unit of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH).

Methods: Swab samples were collected from surfaces such as working benches, door handles, sinks, taps, and trolleys in the Burns Unit of KBTH before and after routine disinfection. The samples were cultured on Blood agar and MacConkey agar. Standard bacteriological techniques, including Gram staining and biochemical tests, were used to identify the isolated bacteria. The isolates were then tested against prepared dilutions of the bleach disinfectant used in the Burns Unit. Additionally, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of sodium hypochlorite against the isolates were determined.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in microbial load before and after routine disinfection for most sampled surfaces (p > 0.05), except for air-exposed plates. The isolated organisms included Staphylococcus aureus, coagulasenegative staphylococci, Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Citrobacter freundii. While the working solution showed no inhibition zones, laboratory testing confirmed that a properly prepared 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was effective against all isolates.

Conclusion: This study found that the bioburden remained high after routine disinfection. A 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution (1:10 dilution of the 5% stock) was effective in eliminating all isolates.

0.5%次氯酸钠消毒在科勒布教学医院烧伤整形科微生物控制中的效果评价
背景:医院感染的上升,也被称为卫生保健相关感染(HAIs),已导致广泛的疾病和死亡,影响患者和卫生保健工作者。这种激增是消毒措施不充分的结果。我们的目的是评估5%消毒剂对Korle-Bu教学医院(KBTH)烧伤病房微生物污染的效果。方法:对KBTH烧伤科的工作台、门把手、水槽、水龙头、手推车等表面进行常规消毒前后的拭子取样。样品分别在Blood琼脂和MacConkey琼脂上培养。标准细菌学技术,包括革兰氏染色和生化试验,用于鉴定分离的细菌。然后将分离物与烧伤科使用的漂白消毒剂的配制稀释剂进行试验。此外,还测定了次氯酸钠对菌株的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)。结果:除空气暴露板外,大多数样品表面常规消毒前后微生物负荷差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。分离出的细菌包括金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固阴性葡萄球菌、链球菌、假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和弗伦地柠檬酸杆菌。虽然工作溶液没有抑制区,但实验室测试证实,适当配制的0.5%次氯酸钠溶液对所有菌株都有效。结论:本研究发现,常规消毒后生物负荷仍较高。0.5%次氯酸钠溶液(5%原液1:10稀释)对所有菌株均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信