{"title":"The clinical toxicity of advanced therapy medicinal products.","authors":"Fraser J H Henderson, Simon L Hill","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) use genes, tissues or cells to offer transformative treatments for a range of diseases. They are associated with different safety challenges when compared to established therapeutics, such as small chemical entities or monoclonal antibodies, due to immunogenicity, off-target effects and organ-specific toxicities. This review evaluates the current clinical evidence on ATMP toxicity, highlighting key mechanisms of toxicity and describing approaches to risk management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify studies reporting toxicities associated with gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs), somatic-cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products and combined ATMPs. Data were extracted and collated qualitatively, focusing on acute and chronic clinical toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were most often reported in GTMPs, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Chronic risks of GTMPs include genotoxicity and tumorigenicity, especially with high-dose adeno-associated virus-based therapies. Somatic-cell therapy medicinal products carry risks of immunological toxicity and tumour formation, particularly in stem cell-based approaches. Tissue-engineered products present challenges of biocompatibility, scaffold degradation and host integration. Management strategies to mitigate anticipated toxicity include preconditioning regimens, safer vector design, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. tocilizumab) and long-term monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ATMPs offer significant therapeutic promise but require robust safety assessments and proactive risk management plans to address their complex potential toxicity profiles. Personalized approaches, advanced preclinical models and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to ensure these therapies fulfil their potential without compromising patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) use genes, tissues or cells to offer transformative treatments for a range of diseases. They are associated with different safety challenges when compared to established therapeutics, such as small chemical entities or monoclonal antibodies, due to immunogenicity, off-target effects and organ-specific toxicities. This review evaluates the current clinical evidence on ATMP toxicity, highlighting key mechanisms of toxicity and describing approaches to risk management.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify studies reporting toxicities associated with gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs), somatic-cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products and combined ATMPs. Data were extracted and collated qualitatively, focusing on acute and chronic clinical toxicity.
Results: Acute toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were most often reported in GTMPs, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Chronic risks of GTMPs include genotoxicity and tumorigenicity, especially with high-dose adeno-associated virus-based therapies. Somatic-cell therapy medicinal products carry risks of immunological toxicity and tumour formation, particularly in stem cell-based approaches. Tissue-engineered products present challenges of biocompatibility, scaffold degradation and host integration. Management strategies to mitigate anticipated toxicity include preconditioning regimens, safer vector design, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. tocilizumab) and long-term monitoring.
Conclusion: ATMPs offer significant therapeutic promise but require robust safety assessments and proactive risk management plans to address their complex potential toxicity profiles. Personalized approaches, advanced preclinical models and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to ensure these therapies fulfil their potential without compromising patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.