{"title":"The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on HbA1c variability and cardiovascular and renal adverse outcome in patients with T2DM.","authors":"Ran Guo, Ambarish Pandey, Chanchal Chandramouli, Mei-Zhen Wu, An-Ping Cai, Ying-Xian Liu, Qing-Wen Ren, Jia-Yi Huang, Jing-Nan Zhang, Wen-Li Gu, Hao-Chen Xuan, Wouter Ouwerkerk, Jasper Tromp, Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng, Christopher Tze-Wei Tsang, Ching-Yan Zhu, Yik-Ming Hung, Carolyn S P Lam, Kai-Hang Yiu","doi":"10.1111/dom.16509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in reducing haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) variability and improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high HbA1c variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This territory-wide cohort study involved patients with T2DM and an HbA1c variability score (HVS) >60% who initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors in Hong Kong between 2015 and 2022. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust for confounders. The primary outcome was post-treatment HVS within 3 years. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious renal events (SRE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20,205 T2DM patients with a baseline HVS >60%, 4,612 SGLT2 inhibitor users were 1:1 matched with DPP-4 inhibitor users. When referencing the 0%-20% quintile, patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors exhibited a reduced likelihood of being in higher HVS quintiles [21%-40%: odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.88; 41%-60%: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.65; 61%-80%: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56; and 81%-100%: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.47]. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.79] and SRE (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with high HbA1c variability, SGLT2 inhibitor initiation was associated with superior effectiveness in reducing HbA1c variability compared to DPP-4 inhibitors. The initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors was linked to significantly reduced cardiovascular and renal adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To compare the effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in reducing haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) variability and improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high HbA1c variability.
Methods: This territory-wide cohort study involved patients with T2DM and an HbA1c variability score (HVS) >60% who initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors in Hong Kong between 2015 and 2022. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust for confounders. The primary outcome was post-treatment HVS within 3 years. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious renal events (SRE).
Results: Among 20,205 T2DM patients with a baseline HVS >60%, 4,612 SGLT2 inhibitor users were 1:1 matched with DPP-4 inhibitor users. When referencing the 0%-20% quintile, patients initiating SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors exhibited a reduced likelihood of being in higher HVS quintiles [21%-40%: odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.88; 41%-60%: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.65; 61%-80%: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56; and 81%-100%: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.47]. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.79] and SRE (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors.
Conclusion: In patients with high HbA1c variability, SGLT2 inhibitor initiation was associated with superior effectiveness in reducing HbA1c variability compared to DPP-4 inhibitors. The initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors was linked to significantly reduced cardiovascular and renal adverse events.
目的:比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂和二肽基肽酶4 (DPP-4)抑制剂在2型糖尿病(T2DM)和高HbA1c变异性患者中降低血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)变异性和改善心血管和肾脏预后方面的有效性。方法:这项区域性队列研究纳入了2015年至2022年间在香港接受SGLT2抑制剂或DPP-4抑制剂治疗的T2DM和HbA1c变异性评分(HVS)为60%的患者。倾向评分(PS)匹配用于调整混杂因素。主要终点是治疗后3年内的HVS。次要结局包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和严重肾脏事件(SRE)。结果:在20205例基线HVS为60%的T2DM患者中,4612例SGLT2抑制剂使用者与DPP-4抑制剂使用者的比例为1:1。当参考0%-20%的五分位数时,与DPP-4抑制剂相比,启动SGLT2抑制剂的患者出现高HVS五分位数的可能性降低[21%-40%:优势比(OR) 0.76, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.66-0.88;41%-60%:或0.57,95% ci 0.50-0.65;61%-80%: or 0.49, 95% ci 0.42-0.56;81%-100%: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.34-0.47]。SGLT2抑制剂与MACE风险降低相关[危险比(HR) 0.69;95% CI 0.60-0.79]和SRE (HR 0.71;95% CI 0.63-0.80)与DPP-4抑制剂相比。结论:在HbA1c变异性高的患者中,与DPP-4抑制剂相比,SGLT2抑制剂启动在降低HbA1c变异性方面具有更好的效果。与DPP-4抑制剂相比,SGLT2抑制剂的启动与心血管和肾脏不良事件的显著减少有关。
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.