An exploratory study to understand how rurality status and demographic characteristics are associated with enrollment, engagement, and retention in a digital health intervention targeting the Appalachian region
Donna-Jean P. Brock , Lee M. Ritterband , Wen You , Annie L. Reid , Kathleen J. Porter , Theresa Markwalter , Jamie M. Zoellner
{"title":"An exploratory study to understand how rurality status and demographic characteristics are associated with enrollment, engagement, and retention in a digital health intervention targeting the Appalachian region","authors":"Donna-Jean P. Brock , Lee M. Ritterband , Wen You , Annie L. Reid , Kathleen J. Porter , Theresa Markwalter , Jamie M. Zoellner","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Digital health studies exploring group disparities across research phases are limited. As a secondary aim of a larger digital health trial, this study explored how rurality and other sociodemographics were associated with enrollment, retention, and engagement in a randomized controlled sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) reduction trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants from a primarily Appalachian sample were randomized into <i>i</i>SIPsmarter (experimental) or static Patient Education (control) websites. Enrollment, retention (6 months), and <i>i</i>SIPsmarter engagement (completion of metered program Core content and SSB and weight diaries) were collected from July 2021 to August 2023. Regression models assessed subgroup associations using Rural Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC), sex, race, age, income, education, and other sociodemographic predictors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 509 eligible participants, 249 (49%) enrolled, and 218 (88%) were retained. Participants were predominantly White (89%), college-educated (59%) females (83%) with household incomes <$55,000/year (52%). Rurality varied: RUCC 1-2 (medium-large metro) = 15%, RUCC 3 (small metro) = 45%, and RUCC 4-9 (nonmetro) = 41%. On average, <i>i</i>SIPsmarter participants (n = 127) completed 4.89/6 (SD = 1.69) Cores and 76% (SD = 29%) and 57% (SD = 31%) of SSB and weight diaries. Rurality was a nonsignificant predictor, but higher education and health literacy increased enrollment likelihood by 37% (95% CI = 1.12-1.67) and 23% (95% CI = 1.03-1.47), respectively. Greater education (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.00-2.29), age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.07), and income (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.00-1.28) significantly predicted retention. Older age significantly (<i>P</i><.05) predicted the completion of Cores and diaries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results suggested rurality was not significantly associated with enrollment, retention, or engagement, though this conclusion warrants caution. Future digital health studies targeting similar populations should consider additional sociodemographic differences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Digital health studies exploring group disparities across research phases are limited. As a secondary aim of a larger digital health trial, this study explored how rurality and other sociodemographics were associated with enrollment, retention, and engagement in a randomized controlled sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) reduction trial.
Methods
Participants from a primarily Appalachian sample were randomized into iSIPsmarter (experimental) or static Patient Education (control) websites. Enrollment, retention (6 months), and iSIPsmarter engagement (completion of metered program Core content and SSB and weight diaries) were collected from July 2021 to August 2023. Regression models assessed subgroup associations using Rural Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC), sex, race, age, income, education, and other sociodemographic predictors.
Findings
Of the 509 eligible participants, 249 (49%) enrolled, and 218 (88%) were retained. Participants were predominantly White (89%), college-educated (59%) females (83%) with household incomes <$55,000/year (52%). Rurality varied: RUCC 1-2 (medium-large metro) = 15%, RUCC 3 (small metro) = 45%, and RUCC 4-9 (nonmetro) = 41%. On average, iSIPsmarter participants (n = 127) completed 4.89/6 (SD = 1.69) Cores and 76% (SD = 29%) and 57% (SD = 31%) of SSB and weight diaries. Rurality was a nonsignificant predictor, but higher education and health literacy increased enrollment likelihood by 37% (95% CI = 1.12-1.67) and 23% (95% CI = 1.03-1.47), respectively. Greater education (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.00-2.29), age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.07), and income (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.00-1.28) significantly predicted retention. Older age significantly (P<.05) predicted the completion of Cores and diaries.
Conclusions
Results suggested rurality was not significantly associated with enrollment, retention, or engagement, though this conclusion warrants caution. Future digital health studies targeting similar populations should consider additional sociodemographic differences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.