Combinations of Non-di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Collection Sets, Storage Bags and Additive Solutions for Red Blood Cells

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Stefan F. van Wonderen , Christie Vermeulen , Johan Lagerberg , Alexander P.J. Vlaar , Thomas R.L. Klei
{"title":"Combinations of Non-di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Collection Sets, Storage Bags and Additive Solutions for Red Blood Cells","authors":"Stefan F. van Wonderen ,&nbsp;Christie Vermeulen ,&nbsp;Johan Lagerberg ,&nbsp;Alexander P.J. Vlaar ,&nbsp;Thomas R.L. Klei","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2025.150904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For decades, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) has been the primary plasticizer used to make polyvinyl chloride (PVC) blood bags flexible. DEHP leaches into the blood product, stabilizing red blood cell (RBC) membranes and preventing excessive hemolysis. Despite being classified as a substance of very high concern due to its potential endocrine-disrupting and carcinogenic effects, DEHP has continued to be used in red cell concentrate (RCC) storage bags, as alternatives have often led to reduced RCC quality during storage. However, under the European Medical Device Regulation the use of DEHP in medical devices is restricted to below 0.1% by weight per July 2030. As a result, the effect of several alternative plasticizers on RCC quality, such as di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT), 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester (DINCH), and N-butyryl-n-hexyl citrate (BTHC), have recently been investigated in combination with different storage solutions. Although previous studies using these new combinations showed variable results, these alternatives remain the most promising options, with current data demonstrating reduced leaching and lower toxicity compared to DEHP. This review highlights key publications on the transition from DEHP-PVC blood bag systems for RCC storage, demonstrating that several non-DEHP alternatives are viable replacement options, particularly when combined with next-generation storage solutions. Future studies are required to assess the frequency of adverse events, the occurrence of handling issues such as leakage, and to evaluate practical performance and clinical efficacy through post-transfusion recovery and increment studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 150904"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088779632500029X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) has been the primary plasticizer used to make polyvinyl chloride (PVC) blood bags flexible. DEHP leaches into the blood product, stabilizing red blood cell (RBC) membranes and preventing excessive hemolysis. Despite being classified as a substance of very high concern due to its potential endocrine-disrupting and carcinogenic effects, DEHP has continued to be used in red cell concentrate (RCC) storage bags, as alternatives have often led to reduced RCC quality during storage. However, under the European Medical Device Regulation the use of DEHP in medical devices is restricted to below 0.1% by weight per July 2030. As a result, the effect of several alternative plasticizers on RCC quality, such as di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT), 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid diisononyl ester (DINCH), and N-butyryl-n-hexyl citrate (BTHC), have recently been investigated in combination with different storage solutions. Although previous studies using these new combinations showed variable results, these alternatives remain the most promising options, with current data demonstrating reduced leaching and lower toxicity compared to DEHP. This review highlights key publications on the transition from DEHP-PVC blood bag systems for RCC storage, demonstrating that several non-DEHP alternatives are viable replacement options, particularly when combined with next-generation storage solutions. Future studies are required to assess the frequency of adverse events, the occurrence of handling issues such as leakage, and to evaluate practical performance and clinical efficacy through post-transfusion recovery and increment studies.
非二(2-乙基己基)邻苯二甲酸盐收集集,储存袋和红细胞添加剂溶液的组合
几十年来,邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)一直是用于使聚氯乙烯(PVC)血袋柔韧的主要增塑剂。DEHP渗入血液制品,稳定红细胞(RBC)膜,防止过度溶血。尽管由于其潜在的内分泌干扰和致癌作用而被列为高度关注的物质,DEHP仍继续用于红细胞浓缩物(RCC)储存袋,因为替代品通常会导致RCC在储存过程中质量下降。然而,根据欧洲医疗器械法规,到2030年7月,医疗器械中DEHP的使用被限制在重量的0.1%以下。因此,最近研究了几种可选增塑剂对RCC质量的影响,如对苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHT)、1,2-环己烷二羧酸二异壬基酯(DINCH)和柠檬酸正丁基正己基(BTHC),它们与不同的储存溶液结合使用。尽管先前使用这些新组合的研究显示出不同的结果,但这些替代方案仍然是最有希望的选择,目前的数据表明,与DEHP相比,这些替代方案可以减少浸出和降低毒性。本综述重点介绍了从DEHP-PVC血袋系统向RCC存储过渡的关键出版物,证明了几种非dehp替代品是可行的替代选择,特别是与下一代存储解决方案相结合时。未来的研究需要评估不良事件的发生频率、泄漏等处理问题的发生情况,并通过输血后恢复和增量研究来评估实际性能和临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信