Node-RADS 1.0 for lymph node involvement detection in renal cell carcinoma: A study on 2D and 3D CT imaging

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chunlei He , Enyu Yuan , Lei Ye , Hui Xu , Qiyou Wu , Jin Yao , Yuntian Chen , Bin Song
{"title":"Node-RADS 1.0 for lymph node involvement detection in renal cell carcinoma: A study on 2D and 3D CT imaging","authors":"Chunlei He ,&nbsp;Enyu Yuan ,&nbsp;Lei Ye ,&nbsp;Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Qiyou Wu ,&nbsp;Jin Yao ,&nbsp;Yuntian Chen ,&nbsp;Bin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) score in predicting lymph node (LN) involvement (LNI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and to compare the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From January 2012 to September 2024, patients with RCC and histologically confirmed LN status who underwent preoperative abdomen computed tomography imaging were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiological assessments were performed independently and blinded by three readers according to the Node-RADS, and both Node-RADS scores based on 2D and 3D modality were recorded. The gold reference of LNI was determined by the histological results after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and inter-agreements for different features were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Finally, 375 patients (median age 55  years; interquartile range (IQR), 45–63 years), including 270 negative LNI and 105 positive LNI, were enrolled in the study. Younger patients showed higher LNI prevalence (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Node-RADS score ≥ 3 yielded a sensitivity of 0.876, a specificity of 0.926 and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.866–0.937) on 2D, which was comparable to Node-RADS score on 3D (Delong test: <em>p</em> = 0.651). An excellent inter-reader agreement was observed for Node-RADS score between three readers based on 2D and 3D modality (Kendall’s W 0.889 and 0.869).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Node-RADS score demonstrates high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with RCC. Node-RADS score based on 2D and 3D modality demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) score in predicting lymph node (LN) involvement (LNI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and to compare the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modality.

Methods

From January 2012 to September 2024, patients with RCC and histologically confirmed LN status who underwent preoperative abdomen computed tomography imaging were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiological assessments were performed independently and blinded by three readers according to the Node-RADS, and both Node-RADS scores based on 2D and 3D modality were recorded. The gold reference of LNI was determined by the histological results after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and inter-agreements for different features were calculated.

Results

Finally, 375 patients (median age 55  years; interquartile range (IQR), 45–63 years), including 270 negative LNI and 105 positive LNI, were enrolled in the study. Younger patients showed higher LNI prevalence (p < 0.001). Node-RADS score ≥ 3 yielded a sensitivity of 0.876, a specificity of 0.926 and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.866–0.937) on 2D, which was comparable to Node-RADS score on 3D (Delong test: p = 0.651). An excellent inter-reader agreement was observed for Node-RADS score between three readers based on 2D and 3D modality (Kendall’s W 0.889 and 0.869).

Conclusions

The Node-RADS score demonstrates high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with RCC. Node-RADS score based on 2D and 3D modality demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance.
肾细胞癌淋巴结受累检测的node - rads 1.0:二维和三维CT成像研究
目的评价淋巴结报告和数据系统1.0 (node - rads)评分对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者淋巴结(LN)累及(LNI)的诊断准确性,并比较基于二维(2D)和三维(3D)模式的node - rads评分的诊断效果。方法回顾性选取2012年1月至2024年9月行术前腹部计算机断层扫描的肾细胞癌和组织学证实的LN患者。根据Node-RADS进行独立和盲法的放射学评估,并记录基于2D和3D模式的Node-RADS评分。术后组织学结果确定LNI的金参考值。计算灵敏度、特异度、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)及不同特征间的一致性。结果375例患者(中位年龄55岁;四分位数范围(IQR) 45-63岁,包括270例LNI阴性和105例LNI阳性纳入研究。年轻患者的LNI患病率较高(p <;0.001)。Node-RADS评分≥3在2D上的敏感性为0.876,特异性为0.926,AUC为0.901 (95% CI 0.866-0.937),与3D上的Node-RADS评分相当(Delong检验:p = 0.651)。基于2D和3D模态,三名读者之间的Node-RADS评分具有良好的读者间一致性(Kendall 's W 0.889和0.869)。结论:Node-RADS评分在鉴别肾细胞癌患者的LNI方面具有较高的总体准确性。基于2D和3D模式的Node-RADS评分显示出可比较的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信