Gender and tenure insecurity in a matrilineal customary system

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Laura Meinzen-Dick , Helder Zavale
{"title":"Gender and tenure insecurity in a matrilineal customary system","authors":"Laura Meinzen-Dick ,&nbsp;Helder Zavale","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we document patterns of land tenure insecurity in a matrilineal region of Mozambique. Using data from a survey of nearly two thousand agricultural households in two districts of Mozambique, we explore the gendered sources and covariates of tenure insecurity that stems either from private land disputes or collective expropriation (by government or large-scale land investors). We find that overall, nearly half of respondents report experiencing collective land tenure insecurity, as compared with only 11.5 % reporting individual tenure insecurity. We further distinguish gendered patterns, finding that men feel 4 percentage points less secure about their rights on the same parcel, a notable finding compared with the majority of evidence from (patrilineal) Africa. Secondly, we make use of the fact that in several of the villages surveyed, the government carried out land rights documentation interventions. Individuals in villages that received formal community land certificates are less worried about collective expropriation than their counterparts in undocumented villages. Finally, we probe the heterogeneity in responses to documentation programs by gender and marital status. This paper fills a crucial gap, by empirically documenting gendered patterns of customary tenure and insecurity in a matrilineal system (15 % of societies in Sub-Saharan Africa practice matrilineal kinship, according to the Ethnographic Atlas), as well as by contributing to a literature that aims to fit land rights documentation interventions to the needs of the community and most effectively enhance tenure security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 107646"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001802","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we document patterns of land tenure insecurity in a matrilineal region of Mozambique. Using data from a survey of nearly two thousand agricultural households in two districts of Mozambique, we explore the gendered sources and covariates of tenure insecurity that stems either from private land disputes or collective expropriation (by government or large-scale land investors). We find that overall, nearly half of respondents report experiencing collective land tenure insecurity, as compared with only 11.5 % reporting individual tenure insecurity. We further distinguish gendered patterns, finding that men feel 4 percentage points less secure about their rights on the same parcel, a notable finding compared with the majority of evidence from (patrilineal) Africa. Secondly, we make use of the fact that in several of the villages surveyed, the government carried out land rights documentation interventions. Individuals in villages that received formal community land certificates are less worried about collective expropriation than their counterparts in undocumented villages. Finally, we probe the heterogeneity in responses to documentation programs by gender and marital status. This paper fills a crucial gap, by empirically documenting gendered patterns of customary tenure and insecurity in a matrilineal system (15 % of societies in Sub-Saharan Africa practice matrilineal kinship, according to the Ethnographic Atlas), as well as by contributing to a literature that aims to fit land rights documentation interventions to the needs of the community and most effectively enhance tenure security.
母系习俗制度中的性别和权属不安全
在本文中,我们记录了莫桑比克母系地区土地保有权不安全的模式。利用对莫桑比克两个地区近2000户农户的调查数据,我们探讨了源于私人土地纠纷或集体征收(由政府或大型土地投资者)的使用权不安全的性别来源和协变量。我们发现,总体而言,近一半的受访者报告集体土地所有权不安全,相比之下,只有11.5% 报告个人土地所有权不安全。我们进一步区分了性别模式,发现男性对自己在同一块土地上的权利的安全感低4个百分点,与来自(父系)非洲的大多数证据相比,这是一个显著的发现。其次,我们利用了这样一个事实,即在几个被调查的村庄,政府进行了土地权利文件干预。在获得正式社区土地证书的村庄里,个人对集体征用的担忧比在没有正式证书的村庄里的人要少。最后,我们探讨了性别和婚姻状况对记录节目反应的异质性。这篇论文填补了一个关键的空白,它从经验上记录了母系制度中习惯权属的性别模式和不安全感(根据《民族志地图集》,撒哈拉以南非洲15% %的社会实行母系亲属关系),并为一篇旨在使土地权利文件化干预措施适应社区需求并最有效地加强权属安全的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信