Patient Experiences of and Priorities for Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care in a US Level 1 Trauma Center: A Qualitative Study

Lindsay D. Nelson PhD , Samuel Gray BA , Courtney O. Barry PsyD , Staci A. Young PhD
{"title":"Patient Experiences of and Priorities for Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care in a US Level 1 Trauma Center: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Lindsay D. Nelson PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel Gray BA ,&nbsp;Courtney O. Barry PsyD ,&nbsp;Staci A. Young PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To learn patient perspectives about health care in a level I trauma center for traumatic brain injury (TBI) that inform the design of better TBI systems of care.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>This was a community-engaged qualitative study that enrolled 42 individuals who had been either treated and discharged home from a level I trauma center emergency department (n=21, 50%) or who were admitted to the trauma center inpatient units (n=21, 50%). Interviews, conducted from August 12, 2022, to September 22, 2023, inquired about injury, post-acute and after post-acute care, clinical and community supports received, unexpected experiences, and things that helped or hurt access to care and outcome. Thematic analyses were completed in October 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged. Participants conveyed a desire to be informed and engaged in their health and health care, reporting deficiencies, for example, in health care providers’ explanation of their TBI diagnosis, communication about in-hospital care, and discharge instructions. They reported varied difficulties navigating the health care system after discharge, resulting in no or insufficient TBI follow-up care. Third, responses illuminated the importance of social risk and resilience factors, with particularly important roles of financial strain and social support. Fourth, participants conveyed unique feelings of vulnerability and uncertainty about TBI resulting from its variable, uncertain course.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings align with and expand on findings from quantitative studies of common gaps in TBI care, whereas illuminating distinct targets for ongoing national and international efforts to develop more coordinated, patient-centered systems of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To learn patient perspectives about health care in a level I trauma center for traumatic brain injury (TBI) that inform the design of better TBI systems of care.

Patients and Methods

This was a community-engaged qualitative study that enrolled 42 individuals who had been either treated and discharged home from a level I trauma center emergency department (n=21, 50%) or who were admitted to the trauma center inpatient units (n=21, 50%). Interviews, conducted from August 12, 2022, to September 22, 2023, inquired about injury, post-acute and after post-acute care, clinical and community supports received, unexpected experiences, and things that helped or hurt access to care and outcome. Thematic analyses were completed in October 2024.

Results

Four themes emerged. Participants conveyed a desire to be informed and engaged in their health and health care, reporting deficiencies, for example, in health care providers’ explanation of their TBI diagnosis, communication about in-hospital care, and discharge instructions. They reported varied difficulties navigating the health care system after discharge, resulting in no or insufficient TBI follow-up care. Third, responses illuminated the importance of social risk and resilience factors, with particularly important roles of financial strain and social support. Fourth, participants conveyed unique feelings of vulnerability and uncertainty about TBI resulting from its variable, uncertain course.

Conclusion

The findings align with and expand on findings from quantitative studies of common gaps in TBI care, whereas illuminating distinct targets for ongoing national and international efforts to develop more coordinated, patient-centered systems of care.
美国1级创伤中心创伤性脑损伤卫生保健的患者经历和优先事项:一项定性研究
目的了解创伤性脑损伤(TBI)一级创伤中心患者对医疗保健的看法,为设计更好的TBI护理系统提供依据。患者和方法这是一项社区参与的定性研究,纳入了42名从一级创伤中心急诊科接受治疗并出院的患者(n= 21,50%)或在创伤中心住院部住院的患者(n= 21,50%)。访谈于2022年8月12日至2023年9月22日进行,询问了受伤,急性后和急性后护理,获得的临床和社区支持,意外经历以及帮助或伤害获得护理和结果的事情。专题分析于2024年10月完成。结果出现了四个主题。参与者表达了了解和参与其健康和保健的愿望,报告了卫生保健提供者对其TBI诊断的解释、关于住院护理的沟通和出院指示等方面的不足。他们报告了出院后在医疗保健系统中遇到的各种困难,导致没有或没有足够的TBI后续护理。第三,社会风险和弹性因素的重要性得到了揭示,其中财政压力和社会支持的作用尤为重要。第四,参与者表达了独特的脆弱感和对TBI的不确定性,这是由其可变的、不确定的过程造成的。结论:研究结果与TBI护理中常见差距的定量研究结果一致,并对其进行了扩展,同时为正在进行的国家和国际努力提供了明确的目标,以发展更加协调、以患者为中心的护理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信