1998-LB: A Two-Year Trial of Metformin to Reduce Frailty in Older Adults with Glucose Intolerance

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.2337/db25-1998-lb
SARA E. ESPINOZA, CHEN-PIN WANG, NICOLAS MUSI
{"title":"1998-LB: A Two-Year Trial of Metformin to Reduce Frailty in Older Adults with Glucose Intolerance","authors":"SARA E. ESPINOZA, CHEN-PIN WANG, NICOLAS MUSI","doi":"10.2337/db25-1998-lb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective: Frailty is a major cause of morbidity and disability in older adults and insulin resistance is an important risk factor for frailty. We conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of metformin in older adults (≥65 years) with glucose intolerance to determine its effect on frailty. Methods: Participants were randomized to 24 months of metformin (initiated at 500 mg/day and titrated to maximum tolerated dose up to 2,000 mg/day) or matching placebo. All participants received one session of diet and exercise counseling prior to initiation of study drug. The primary outcome was frailty as measured by the frailty index based on deficit accumulation model and frailty phenotype based on Fried criteria, which was assessed every 6 months. Using intention to treat, we conducted generalized estimating equations (GEE) models to examine the change in frailty per month by frailty index and Fried criteria. Results: One hundred forty-five participants were randomized; intention to treat analysis included 141 participants who took at least one dose of study drug. At baseline, participants were 48% female, 35% Hispanic/Latino, and mean age was 71.8 ±5.3 years. Metformin did not cause serious adverse events. Metformin led to a significant reduction in frailty progression rate per month assessed by frailty index compared to placebo (-0.0494 ±0.0216, 95%CI: -0.0918, -0.0071, p=0.0222). No difference was observed by Fried criteria (0.0116 ±0.0077, 95%CI: -0.0034, 0.0266, p=0.1302). Conclusion: Metformin administration to older adults with glucose intolerance may be useful for the prevention of frailty and extension of healthspan. Disclosure S.E. Espinoza: None. C. Wang: None. N. Musi: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (R01AG052697)","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":"602 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-1998-lb","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Frailty is a major cause of morbidity and disability in older adults and insulin resistance is an important risk factor for frailty. We conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of metformin in older adults (≥65 years) with glucose intolerance to determine its effect on frailty. Methods: Participants were randomized to 24 months of metformin (initiated at 500 mg/day and titrated to maximum tolerated dose up to 2,000 mg/day) or matching placebo. All participants received one session of diet and exercise counseling prior to initiation of study drug. The primary outcome was frailty as measured by the frailty index based on deficit accumulation model and frailty phenotype based on Fried criteria, which was assessed every 6 months. Using intention to treat, we conducted generalized estimating equations (GEE) models to examine the change in frailty per month by frailty index and Fried criteria. Results: One hundred forty-five participants were randomized; intention to treat analysis included 141 participants who took at least one dose of study drug. At baseline, participants were 48% female, 35% Hispanic/Latino, and mean age was 71.8 ±5.3 years. Metformin did not cause serious adverse events. Metformin led to a significant reduction in frailty progression rate per month assessed by frailty index compared to placebo (-0.0494 ±0.0216, 95%CI: -0.0918, -0.0071, p=0.0222). No difference was observed by Fried criteria (0.0116 ±0.0077, 95%CI: -0.0034, 0.0266, p=0.1302). Conclusion: Metformin administration to older adults with glucose intolerance may be useful for the prevention of frailty and extension of healthspan. Disclosure S.E. Espinoza: None. C. Wang: None. N. Musi: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (R01AG052697)
1998-LB:一项为期两年的二甲双胍治疗老年人葡萄糖耐受不良的试验
简介与目的:虚弱是老年人发病和致残的主要原因,胰岛素抵抗是虚弱的重要危险因素。我们对患有葡萄糖耐受不良的老年人(≥65岁)进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的二甲双胍临床试验,以确定其对虚弱的影响。方法:参与者被随机分配到24个月的二甲双胍组(起始剂量为500 mg/天,逐渐调整到最大耐受剂量高达2000 mg/天)或匹配的安慰剂组。在开始服用研究药物之前,所有参与者都接受了一次饮食和运动咨询。主要结局是虚弱,通过基于缺陷积累模型的虚弱指数和基于Fried标准的虚弱表型来衡量,每6个月评估一次。使用意向治疗,我们采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型,通过虚弱指数和Fried标准检查每个月虚弱程度的变化。结果:145名参与者被随机化;意向治疗分析包括141名至少服用一剂研究药物的参与者。基线时,参与者48%为女性,35%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,平均年龄为71.8±5.3岁。二甲双胍未引起严重的不良事件。与安慰剂相比,二甲双胍导致衰弱指数评估的每月衰弱进展率显著降低(-0.0494±0.0216,95%CI: -0.0918, -0.0071, p=0.0222)。采用Fried标准无差异(0.0116±0.0077,95%CI: -0.0034, 0.0266, p=0.1302)。结论:二甲双胍对老年糖耐受不良患者有预防虚弱和延长健康寿命的作用。S.E.埃斯皮诺萨:没有。王:没有。N. Musi:没有。国家卫生研究院资助(R01AG052697)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes
Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1968
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes. However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信