Patient Satisfaction with Lung Transplant Telemedicine: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2
June Kim, Ester Villalonga-Olives, George Doumat, Roumen M Vesselinov, Julio A Huapaya, Hatoon M N Abbas, Vaidehi Kaza, Srinivas Bollineni, Nicholas Ladikos, Adrian Lawrence, Manish R Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Fernando Torres, Vipul Patel, Anu Varghese, Aldo T Iacono, Bartley P Griffith, Michael L Terrin, Irina Timofte
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction with Lung Transplant Telemedicine: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"June Kim, Ester Villalonga-Olives, George Doumat, Roumen M Vesselinov, Julio A Huapaya, Hatoon M N Abbas, Vaidehi Kaza, Srinivas Bollineni, Nicholas Ladikos, Adrian Lawrence, Manish R Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Fernando Torres, Vipul Patel, Anu Varghese, Aldo T Iacono, Bartley P Griffith, Michael L Terrin, Irina Timofte","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine has become essential for maintaining post-transplant care while reducing exposure risks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lung transplant recipients require frequent monitoring due to chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. This study evaluates patient satisfaction and the feasibility of a lung transplant telemedicine program using a multidimensional, patient-centered survey. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an observational study at the University of Maryland Lung Transplant Center between March and November 2020. A customized telemedicine satisfaction survey, developed with expert and patient input, was distributed via e-mail to lung transplant recipients, with a follow-up 6 months later. Key domains included quality of care, technology usability, cost burden, and overall experience. <b>Results:</b> Of 148 patients surveyed, 106 responded, with 53 completing the follow-up survey. In the initial and follow-up surveys, 94% and 89% rated telemedicine care as \"very good\" or \"excellent.\" Technology usability was high, with 96% and 94% reporting good understanding. Most patients (90% initially, 84% at follow-up) noted decreased travel costs. However, while patients appreciated these benefits, preference for in-person visits increased from 45% initially to 65% at follow-up. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lung transplant patients reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, benefiting from reduced costs and COVID-19 exposure risk. The survey captured the complexities of post-transplant care while addressing technological barriers. Future research should validate telemedicine satisfaction tools across multiple centers and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in transplant populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine has become essential for maintaining post-transplant care while reducing exposure risks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lung transplant recipients require frequent monitoring due to chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. This study evaluates patient satisfaction and the feasibility of a lung transplant telemedicine program using a multidimensional, patient-centered survey. Methods: We conducted an observational study at the University of Maryland Lung Transplant Center between March and November 2020. A customized telemedicine satisfaction survey, developed with expert and patient input, was distributed via e-mail to lung transplant recipients, with a follow-up 6 months later. Key domains included quality of care, technology usability, cost burden, and overall experience. Results: Of 148 patients surveyed, 106 responded, with 53 completing the follow-up survey. In the initial and follow-up surveys, 94% and 89% rated telemedicine care as "very good" or "excellent." Technology usability was high, with 96% and 94% reporting good understanding. Most patients (90% initially, 84% at follow-up) noted decreased travel costs. However, while patients appreciated these benefits, preference for in-person visits increased from 45% initially to 65% at follow-up. Conclusion: Lung transplant patients reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, benefiting from reduced costs and COVID-19 exposure risk. The survey captured the complexities of post-transplant care while addressing technological barriers. Future research should validate telemedicine satisfaction tools across multiple centers and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in transplant populations.

患者对肺移植远程医疗的满意度:来自COVID-19大流行的教训。
背景:在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,远程医疗已成为维持移植后护理,同时降低暴露风险的关键。由于慢性免疫抑制和合并症,肺移植受者需要经常监测。本研究评估患者满意度和可行性的肺移植远程医疗计划使用多维度,以患者为中心的调查。方法:我们于2020年3月至11月在马里兰大学肺移植中心进行了一项观察性研究。根据专家和患者的意见,定制了一份远程医疗满意度调查,通过电子邮件分发给肺移植受者,并在6个月后进行随访。关键领域包括护理质量、技术可用性、成本负担和整体体验。结果:148例患者中,106例有应答,53例完成随访。在最初和后续调查中,分别有94%和89%的受访者认为远程医疗护理“非常好”或“优秀”。技术可用性很高,96%和94%的人表示理解得很好。大多数患者(最初90%,随访时84%)表示旅行费用降低。然而,虽然患者欣赏这些好处,但在随访时,对亲自就诊的偏好从最初的45%增加到65%。结论:肺移植患者对远程医疗满意度高,受益于降低成本和COVID-19暴露风险。这项调查反映了移植后护理的复杂性,同时解决了技术障碍。未来的研究应该验证跨多个中心的远程医疗满意度工具,并评估其对移植人群临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信