Early Assessment on the Impact of Virtual Backgrounds on Patient Perceptions in Telemedicine.

Bree Holtz, Mengyan Ma
{"title":"Early Assessment on the Impact of Virtual Backgrounds on Patient Perceptions in Telemedicine.","authors":"Bree Holtz, Mengyan Ma","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Telemedicine is widely used, yet nonverbal cues such as virtual backgrounds remain understudied despite their potential influence on patient perceptions of provider credibility. <b>Methods:</b> This study used a randomized experimental design to examine the impact of three telemedicine background conditions, clinical, home office, and plain white, on patient ratings of provider expertness, competence, and ethicality. Participants (N = 136) were recruited from a large Midwestern university and completed a postvideo survey. <b>Results:</b> Analysis of variance results showed significant effects of background type on all three credibility measures. Providers in the white background condition were consistently rated lower in expertness, competence, and ethicality compared with the clinical and home office backgrounds. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings suggest virtual backgrounds convey meaningful professional cues. Clinical and home office settings enhanced perceptions of provider credibility, while plain backgrounds diminished them. Background choice in telemedicine influences patient trust, underscoring the need for visual professionalism guidelines in virtual care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine is widely used, yet nonverbal cues such as virtual backgrounds remain understudied despite their potential influence on patient perceptions of provider credibility. Methods: This study used a randomized experimental design to examine the impact of three telemedicine background conditions, clinical, home office, and plain white, on patient ratings of provider expertness, competence, and ethicality. Participants (N = 136) were recruited from a large Midwestern university and completed a postvideo survey. Results: Analysis of variance results showed significant effects of background type on all three credibility measures. Providers in the white background condition were consistently rated lower in expertness, competence, and ethicality compared with the clinical and home office backgrounds. Conclusions: Findings suggest virtual backgrounds convey meaningful professional cues. Clinical and home office settings enhanced perceptions of provider credibility, while plain backgrounds diminished them. Background choice in telemedicine influences patient trust, underscoring the need for visual professionalism guidelines in virtual care settings.

远程医疗中虚拟背景对患者感知影响的早期评估。
远程医疗被广泛使用,然而非语言线索,如虚拟背景,尽管它们对患者对提供者可信度的看法有潜在影响,但仍未得到充分研究。方法:本研究采用随机实验设计,考察临床、家庭办公室和普通白色三种远程医疗背景条件对患者对提供者专业程度、能力和道德的评分的影响。参与者(N = 136)从中西部一所大型大学招募,并完成了视频后的调查。结果:方差分析结果显示背景类型对三项可信度测量均有显著影响。与临床和家庭办公室背景相比,白色背景条件下的提供者在专业程度、能力和道德方面的评分始终较低。结论:研究结果表明,虚拟背景传达了有意义的职业线索。临床和家庭办公环境提高了对提供者可信度的认知,而普通背景则降低了他们的可信度。远程医疗的背景选择影响患者信任,强调在虚拟护理环境中需要视觉专业指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信