Mapping the intersection of demographics, behavior, and government response to the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study.

Katherine M Kennedy, Erica N DeJong, Alexander W Y Chan, Allison E Kennedy, Alainna Jamal, Michael G Surette, Maggie J Larché, Mark Larché, Nathan Hambly, Kjetil Ask, Stephanie A Atkinson, Paul D McNicholas, Allison McGeer, Brenda L Coleman, Dawn M E Bowdish
{"title":"Mapping the intersection of demographics, behavior, and government response to the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study.","authors":"Katherine M Kennedy, Erica N DeJong, Alexander W Y Chan, Allison E Kennedy, Alainna Jamal, Michael G Surette, Maggie J Larché, Mark Larché, Nathan Hambly, Kjetil Ask, Stephanie A Atkinson, Paul D McNicholas, Allison McGeer, Brenda L Coleman, Dawn M E Bowdish","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00162-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the province of Ontario enacted restrictions and recommendations that changed over time. These measures were effective in reducing COVID-19-related illness and deaths, but adherence to these non-pharmaceutical interventions may be modified by individual factors including demographics and health status which shape exposure risk behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 348 participants completed baseline questionnaires (to assess demographics, pre-pandemic exposure risk, and health status), weekly illness reports, and monthly social distancing behavior questionnaires to evaluate exposure risk over time in response to changing levels of government restrictions. Exposure risk behaviors were calculated using seven categories: attendance at social events, receiving care (hospital, etc.), visiting or volunteering at care facilities, public transportation use, hours working outside of the home, hours volunteering outside of the home, and handwashing frequency. The impact of individual and environmental factors on exposure risk over time was evaluated by a Poisson family generalized linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants across all age groups and health statuses adapted their behaviors in response to evolving regulations, but older individuals and those with pre-existing conditions had the largest change in behavior. These individuals also had the most severe symptoms when they developed COVID-19 or other influenza-like illnesses. Participants who were older or had pre-existing health conditions had lower levels of exposure risk overall, and this was largely driven by a lower prevalence and frequency of in-person work. Female participants also had lower levels of exposure risk overall, consistent with an increased frequency of handwashing in this group. Unexpectedly, we found no effect of vaccination on total exposure risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participant behavior was generally responsive to government-imposed restrictions, with increased stringency coinciding with decreased exposure risk among participants. Demographic-associated differences in exposure risk behaviors appear to be driven by systemic factors (i.e., a return to in-person work) to a greater extent than personal choices (i.e., social gatherings). These findings emphasize the interplay between demographic factors and government interventions in shaping individual behaviors over the course of the pandemic. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for informing interventions and mitigating the impact of future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00162-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the province of Ontario enacted restrictions and recommendations that changed over time. These measures were effective in reducing COVID-19-related illness and deaths, but adherence to these non-pharmaceutical interventions may be modified by individual factors including demographics and health status which shape exposure risk behaviors.

Methods: A total of 348 participants completed baseline questionnaires (to assess demographics, pre-pandemic exposure risk, and health status), weekly illness reports, and monthly social distancing behavior questionnaires to evaluate exposure risk over time in response to changing levels of government restrictions. Exposure risk behaviors were calculated using seven categories: attendance at social events, receiving care (hospital, etc.), visiting or volunteering at care facilities, public transportation use, hours working outside of the home, hours volunteering outside of the home, and handwashing frequency. The impact of individual and environmental factors on exposure risk over time was evaluated by a Poisson family generalized linear mixed model.

Results: Participants across all age groups and health statuses adapted their behaviors in response to evolving regulations, but older individuals and those with pre-existing conditions had the largest change in behavior. These individuals also had the most severe symptoms when they developed COVID-19 or other influenza-like illnesses. Participants who were older or had pre-existing health conditions had lower levels of exposure risk overall, and this was largely driven by a lower prevalence and frequency of in-person work. Female participants also had lower levels of exposure risk overall, consistent with an increased frequency of handwashing in this group. Unexpectedly, we found no effect of vaccination on total exposure risk.

Conclusions: Participant behavior was generally responsive to government-imposed restrictions, with increased stringency coinciding with decreased exposure risk among participants. Demographic-associated differences in exposure risk behaviors appear to be driven by systemic factors (i.e., a return to in-person work) to a greater extent than personal choices (i.e., social gatherings). These findings emphasize the interplay between demographic factors and government interventions in shaping individual behaviors over the course of the pandemic. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for informing interventions and mitigating the impact of future pandemics.

绘制人口统计学、行为和政府应对COVID-19大流行的交集:一项观察性队列研究。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行的早期阶段,安大略省颁布了随着时间的推移而改变的限制和建议。这些措施在减少与covid -19相关的疾病和死亡方面是有效的,但对这些非药物干预措施的依从性可能会受到个人因素的影响,包括影响暴露风险行为的人口统计和健康状况。方法:共有348名参与者完成了基线问卷(以评估人口统计学、大流行前暴露风险和健康状况)、每周疾病报告和每月社会距离行为问卷,以评估随时间变化的暴露风险,以应对政府限制水平的变化。暴露风险行为通过七个类别来计算:参加社交活动、接受护理(医院等)、在护理机构就诊或做志愿者、使用公共交通工具、在家外工作时间、在家外做志愿者时间和洗手频率。个体因素和环境因素对暴露风险的影响通过泊松族广义线性混合模型进行了评估。结果:所有年龄组和健康状况的参与者都根据不断变化的法规调整了他们的行为,但老年人和那些已有疾病的人在行为上的变化最大。这些人在患上COVID-19或其他流感样疾病时,症状也最严重。总体而言,年龄较大或已有健康问题的参与者的暴露风险水平较低,这主要是由于面对面工作的流行率和频率较低。总体而言,女性参与者的暴露风险也较低,这与她们洗手频率的增加是一致的。出乎意料的是,我们发现接种疫苗对总暴露风险没有影响。结论:参与者的行为通常对政府施加的限制有反应,并且严格程度的增加与参与者暴露风险的降低相一致。暴露风险行为中与人口统计学相关的差异似乎在更大程度上是由系统因素(即,回归面对面的工作)而不是个人选择(即,社交聚会)驱动的。这些发现强调了人口因素与政府干预在大流行期间影响个人行为之间的相互作用。了解这些动态对于为干预措施提供信息和减轻未来流行病的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信