Brain MRI signatures across sex and CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf210
You Cheng, Yingnan He, Karthik Gopinath, Benjamin Billot, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Chao-Yi Wu, Hiroko Dodge, Anne-Marie Wills, Becky Carlyle, Pia Kivisäkk, Bradley T Hyman, Steven E Arnold, Sudeshna Das
{"title":"Brain MRI signatures across sex and CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.","authors":"You Cheng, Yingnan He, Karthik Gopinath, Benjamin Billot, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Chao-Yi Wu, Hiroko Dodge, Anne-Marie Wills, Becky Carlyle, Pia Kivisäkk, Bradley T Hyman, Steven E Arnold, Sudeshna Das","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegenerative effects is not fully understood. This study investigates neurodegeneration patterns across CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarker groups, the association of brain volumes with CSF amyloid and tau status and sex differences in these relationships in a clinical neurology sample. MRI and CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers data were analysed in 306 patients of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system aged 50+ (mean age = 68.4 ± 8.8 years; 43.1% female), who had lumbar punctures within 1 year of clinical MRI scans. We first analysed neurodegeneration patterns across four biomarker groups: 60 controls (A-T-&CU; amyloid negative, tau negative, cognitively unimpaired), 25 A+T- (amyloid positive, tau negative), 121 A+T+ (amyloid positive, tau positive) and 100 other dementia (A-T-&CI; amyloid negative, tau negative, cognitively impaired). Second, we examined volumetric associations with amyloid (amyloid positive, tau negative versus control) and tau in the presence of amyloid (amyloid positive, tau positive versus amyloid positive, tau negative) across 52 brain areas. Third, we examined sex differences in these relationships. Finally, we validated core analyses across three independent datasets-NACC (National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center), ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) and EPAD (European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia)-totalling 3137 participants, and performed meta-analyses to obtain more robust estimates. We observed distinct neurodegeneration patterns across biomarker groups, with disrupted connectivity (brain volume covariance networks) in amyloid positive and other dementia groups, while amyloid and tau negative, cognitively unimpaired controls exhibited the most connected network. Amyloid was associated with subcortical, cerebellar and brainstem atrophy, with consistent association observations in the thalamus and amygdala across all four datasets. Tau in the presence of amyloid demonstrated general brain shrinkage through enlargement of extracerebral CSF, alongside unexpected ventricle shrinkages. Sex-based analyses revealed that A+T+ (amyloid positive, tau positive) had lower sex differences in connectivity patterns compared with other groups. Sex differences were also noted in amyloid-related ventricular volume changes. This study reveals how amyloid and tau affect brain connectivity and volume across sex and CSF biomarker groups, emphasizing global brain changes and sex differences. By leveraging automated pipelines and advanced MRI and biomarker analyses, we extracted meaningful and replicable findings from heterogeneous clinical samples from real-world data. The meta-analyses across four datasets enhance the generalizability of our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 3","pages":"fcaf210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegenerative effects is not fully understood. This study investigates neurodegeneration patterns across CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarker groups, the association of brain volumes with CSF amyloid and tau status and sex differences in these relationships in a clinical neurology sample. MRI and CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers data were analysed in 306 patients of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system aged 50+ (mean age = 68.4 ± 8.8 years; 43.1% female), who had lumbar punctures within 1 year of clinical MRI scans. We first analysed neurodegeneration patterns across four biomarker groups: 60 controls (A-T-&CU; amyloid negative, tau negative, cognitively unimpaired), 25 A+T- (amyloid positive, tau negative), 121 A+T+ (amyloid positive, tau positive) and 100 other dementia (A-T-&CI; amyloid negative, tau negative, cognitively impaired). Second, we examined volumetric associations with amyloid (amyloid positive, tau negative versus control) and tau in the presence of amyloid (amyloid positive, tau positive versus amyloid positive, tau negative) across 52 brain areas. Third, we examined sex differences in these relationships. Finally, we validated core analyses across three independent datasets-NACC (National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center), ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) and EPAD (European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia)-totalling 3137 participants, and performed meta-analyses to obtain more robust estimates. We observed distinct neurodegeneration patterns across biomarker groups, with disrupted connectivity (brain volume covariance networks) in amyloid positive and other dementia groups, while amyloid and tau negative, cognitively unimpaired controls exhibited the most connected network. Amyloid was associated with subcortical, cerebellar and brainstem atrophy, with consistent association observations in the thalamus and amygdala across all four datasets. Tau in the presence of amyloid demonstrated general brain shrinkage through enlargement of extracerebral CSF, alongside unexpected ventricle shrinkages. Sex-based analyses revealed that A+T+ (amyloid positive, tau positive) had lower sex differences in connectivity patterns compared with other groups. Sex differences were also noted in amyloid-related ventricular volume changes. This study reveals how amyloid and tau affect brain connectivity and volume across sex and CSF biomarker groups, emphasizing global brain changes and sex differences. By leveraging automated pipelines and advanced MRI and biomarker analyses, we extracted meaningful and replicable findings from heterogeneous clinical samples from real-world data. The meta-analyses across four datasets enhance the generalizability of our results.

跨性别的脑MRI特征和脑脊液阿尔茨海默病生物标志物。
阿尔茨海默病的脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物与神经退行性作用之间的关系尚不完全清楚。本研究调查了脑脊液阿尔茨海默病生物标志物组的神经退行性变模式,脑容量与脑脊液淀粉样蛋白和tau状态的关联,以及临床神经病学样本中这些关系的性别差异。对306例50岁以上(平均年龄= 68.4±8.8岁)的麻省总医院布里格姆医疗系统患者的MRI和CSF阿尔茨海默病生物标志物数据进行分析;43.1%女性),在临床MRI扫描1年内进行腰椎穿刺。我们首先分析了四个生物标志物组的神经变性模式:60个对照组(A-T-&CU;淀粉样蛋白阴性,tau阴性,认知未受损),25个A+T-(淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau阴性),121个A+T+(淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau阳性)和100个其他痴呆症(A-T-& ci;淀粉样蛋白阴性,tau蛋白阴性,认知障碍)。其次,我们检查了52个大脑区域中淀粉样蛋白(淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau蛋白阴性与对照组)和淀粉样蛋白存在时tau蛋白的体积关联(淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau蛋白阳性与淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau蛋白阴性)。第三,我们研究了这些关系中的性别差异。最后,我们验证了三个独立数据集(nacc(国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心)、ADNI(阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议)和EPAD(欧洲阿尔茨海默病痴呆症预防)的核心分析,共3137名参与者,并进行meta分析以获得更稳健的估计。我们在不同的生物标志物组中观察到不同的神经变性模式,淀粉样蛋白阳性和其他痴呆组的连通性(脑容量协方差网络)被破坏,而淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白阴性、认知未受损的对照组表现出最紧密的连接网络。淀粉样蛋白与皮层下、小脑和脑干萎缩有关,在所有四个数据集中,在丘脑和杏仁核中观察到一致的关联。淀粉样蛋白存在时,Tau通过脑脊液扩大表现出普遍的脑萎缩,同时伴有意想不到的脑室萎缩。基于性别的分析显示,与其他组相比,A+T+(淀粉样蛋白阳性,tau阳性)在连接模式上的性别差异较小。淀粉样蛋白相关的心室容积变化也存在性别差异。这项研究揭示了淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白如何影响不同性别和脑脊液生物标志物组的大脑连通性和体积,强调了大脑的整体变化和性别差异。通过利用自动化管道和先进的MRI和生物标志物分析,我们从现实世界数据的异质临床样本中提取了有意义且可复制的发现。跨四个数据集的荟萃分析增强了我们结果的概括性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信