Implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of ultraportable chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in active case finding for tuberculosis in Nigeria.
Tushar Garg, Stephen John, Suraj Abdulkarim, Adamu D Ahmed, Beatrice Kirubi, Md Toufiq Rahman, Emperor Ubochioma, Jacob Creswell
{"title":"Implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of ultraportable chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in active case finding for tuberculosis in Nigeria.","authors":"Tushar Garg, Stephen John, Suraj Abdulkarim, Adamu D Ahmed, Beatrice Kirubi, Md Toufiq Rahman, Emperor Ubochioma, Jacob Creswell","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Availability of ultraportable chest x-ray (CXR) and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CXR interpretation are promising developments in tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) but costing and cost-effectiveness analyses are limited. We provide implementation cost and cost-effectiveness estimates of different screening algorithms using symptoms, CXR and AI in Nigeria. People 15 years and older were screened for TB symptoms and offered a CXR with AI-enabled interpretation using qXR v3 (Qure.ai) at lung health camps. Sputum samples were tested on Xpert MTB/RIF for individuals reporting symptoms or with qXR abnormality scores ≥0.30. We conducted a retrospective costing using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches while utilizing itemized expense data from a health system perspective. We estimated costs in five screening scenarios: abnormality score ≥0.30 and ≥0.50; cough ≥ 2 weeks; any symptom; abnormality score ≥0.30 or any symptom. We calculated total implementation costs, cost per bacteriologically-confirmed case detected, and assessed cost-effectiveness using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as additional cost per additional case. Overall, 3205 people with presumptive TB were identified, 1021 were tested, and 85 people with bacteriologically-confirmed TB were detected. Abnormality ≥ 0.30 or any symptom (US$65704) had the highest costs while cough ≥ 2 weeks was the lowest (US$40740). The cost per case was US$1198 for cough ≥ 2 weeks, and lowest for any symptom (US$635). Compared to baseline strategy of cough ≥ 2 weeks, the ICER for any symptom was US$191 per additional case detected and US$ 2096 for Abnormality ≥0.30 OR any symptom algorithm. Using CXR and AI had lower cost per case detected than any symptom screening criteria when asymptomatic TB was higher than 30% of all bacteriologically-confirmed TB detected. Compared to traditional symptom screening, using CXR and AI in combination with symptoms detects more cases at lower cost per case detected and is cost-effective. TB programs should explore adoption of CXR and AI for screening in ACF.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000894"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12157241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Availability of ultraportable chest x-ray (CXR) and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CXR interpretation are promising developments in tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) but costing and cost-effectiveness analyses are limited. We provide implementation cost and cost-effectiveness estimates of different screening algorithms using symptoms, CXR and AI in Nigeria. People 15 years and older were screened for TB symptoms and offered a CXR with AI-enabled interpretation using qXR v3 (Qure.ai) at lung health camps. Sputum samples were tested on Xpert MTB/RIF for individuals reporting symptoms or with qXR abnormality scores ≥0.30. We conducted a retrospective costing using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches while utilizing itemized expense data from a health system perspective. We estimated costs in five screening scenarios: abnormality score ≥0.30 and ≥0.50; cough ≥ 2 weeks; any symptom; abnormality score ≥0.30 or any symptom. We calculated total implementation costs, cost per bacteriologically-confirmed case detected, and assessed cost-effectiveness using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as additional cost per additional case. Overall, 3205 people with presumptive TB were identified, 1021 were tested, and 85 people with bacteriologically-confirmed TB were detected. Abnormality ≥ 0.30 or any symptom (US$65704) had the highest costs while cough ≥ 2 weeks was the lowest (US$40740). The cost per case was US$1198 for cough ≥ 2 weeks, and lowest for any symptom (US$635). Compared to baseline strategy of cough ≥ 2 weeks, the ICER for any symptom was US$191 per additional case detected and US$ 2096 for Abnormality ≥0.30 OR any symptom algorithm. Using CXR and AI had lower cost per case detected than any symptom screening criteria when asymptomatic TB was higher than 30% of all bacteriologically-confirmed TB detected. Compared to traditional symptom screening, using CXR and AI in combination with symptoms detects more cases at lower cost per case detected and is cost-effective. TB programs should explore adoption of CXR and AI for screening in ACF.