Enhancing Cross-Domain Generalizability in Social Determinants of Health Extraction with Prompt-Tuning Large Language Models.

Cheng Peng, Zehao Yu, Kaleb E Smith, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Jiang Bian, Yonghui Wu
{"title":"Enhancing Cross-Domain Generalizability in Social Determinants of Health Extraction with Prompt-Tuning Large Language Models.","authors":"Cheng Peng, Zehao Yu, Kaleb E Smith, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Jiang Bian, Yonghui Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The progress in natural language processing (NLP) using large language models (LLMs) has greatly improved patient information extraction from clinical narratives. However, most methods based on the fine-tuning strategy have limited transfer learning ability for cross-domain applications. This study proposed a novel approach that employs a soft prompt-based learning architecture, which introduces trainable prompts to guide LLMs toward desired outputs. We examined two types of LLM architectures, including encoder-only GatorTron and decoder-only GatorTronGPT, and evaluated their performance for the extraction of social determinants of health (SDoH) using a cross-institution dataset from the 2022 n2c2 challenge and a cross-disease dataset from the University of Florida (UF) Health. The results show that decoder-only LLMs with prompt tuning achieved better performance in cross-domain applications. GatorTronGPT achieved the best F1 scores for both datasets, outperforming traditional fine-tuned GatorTron by 8.9% and 21.8% in a cross-institution setting, and 5.5% and 14.5% in a cross-disease setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":"2025 ","pages":"432-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The progress in natural language processing (NLP) using large language models (LLMs) has greatly improved patient information extraction from clinical narratives. However, most methods based on the fine-tuning strategy have limited transfer learning ability for cross-domain applications. This study proposed a novel approach that employs a soft prompt-based learning architecture, which introduces trainable prompts to guide LLMs toward desired outputs. We examined two types of LLM architectures, including encoder-only GatorTron and decoder-only GatorTronGPT, and evaluated their performance for the extraction of social determinants of health (SDoH) using a cross-institution dataset from the 2022 n2c2 challenge and a cross-disease dataset from the University of Florida (UF) Health. The results show that decoder-only LLMs with prompt tuning achieved better performance in cross-domain applications. GatorTronGPT achieved the best F1 scores for both datasets, outperforming traditional fine-tuned GatorTron by 8.9% and 21.8% in a cross-institution setting, and 5.5% and 14.5% in a cross-disease setting.

利用快速调优的大语言模型增强健康提取社会决定因素的跨领域泛化性。
利用大型语言模型(llm)的自然语言处理(NLP)的进展极大地改善了从临床叙述中提取患者信息。然而,大多数基于微调策略的方法在跨领域应用中的迁移学习能力有限。本研究提出了一种新颖的方法,采用基于软提示的学习架构,引入可训练的提示来指导法学硕士获得期望的输出。我们研究了两种类型的LLM架构,包括仅编码器的GatorTron和仅解码器的GatorTronGPT,并使用来自2022年n2c2挑战的跨机构数据集和来自佛罗里达大学(UF)健康的跨疾病数据集评估了它们在提取健康社会决定因素(SDoH)方面的性能。结果表明,具有快速调优的纯解码器llm在跨域应用中获得了更好的性能。GatorTronGPT在两个数据集上都取得了最好的F1分数,在跨机构设置中比传统的微调GatorTron高8.9%和21.8%,在跨疾病设置中比传统的GatorTron高5.5%和14.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信