Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib for patients with HCC with MVI after resection: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf139
Yu-Chao Hou, Jin-Kai Feng, Kang Wang, Zhen-Bang Lou, Qian Wei, Xu Wang, Ying-Jue Tang, Zong-Han Liu, Yan-Jun Xiang, Fei-Fei Mao, Lin Gong, Shu-Qun Cheng
{"title":"Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib for patients with HCC with MVI after resection: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Yu-Chao Hou, Jin-Kai Feng, Kang Wang, Zhen-Bang Lou, Qian Wei, Xu Wang, Ying-Jue Tang, Zong-Han Liu, Yan-Jun Xiang, Fei-Fei Mao, Lin Gong, Shu-Qun Cheng","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a critical prognostic factor affecting long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its clinical significance, the optimal postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC patients with MVI remains undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) combined with lenvatinib vs PA-TACE alone in HCC patients with MVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive HCC patients with MVI who underwent curative-intent resection followed by either PA-TACE alone or PA-TACE plus lenvatinib between 2018 and 2022. To ensure comparability, baseline characteristics were balanced using 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM). The study outcomes, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were compared between the two treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 192 patients, with 106 in the PA-TACE alone group and 86 in the PA-TACE plus lenvatinib group. After PSM, 66 matched pairs were analyzed. The median OS and RFS in the PA-TACE plus lenvatinib group were significantly longer than those in the PA-TACE alone group (43.6 months vs 24.0 months, P = 0.015; and 19.6 months vs 10.2 months, P = 0.025, respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed that PA-TACE plus lenvatinib was an independent protective factor for both OS and RFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of PA-TACE and lenvatinib significantly improves survival outcomes in HCC patients with MVI following curative liver resection compared to PA-TACE alone. These findings suggest that this combined approach may be a more effective adjuvant therapy for this high-risk patient population. Further studies are necessary to validate these results and establish clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a critical prognostic factor affecting long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its clinical significance, the optimal postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC patients with MVI remains undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) combined with lenvatinib vs PA-TACE alone in HCC patients with MVI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive HCC patients with MVI who underwent curative-intent resection followed by either PA-TACE alone or PA-TACE plus lenvatinib between 2018 and 2022. To ensure comparability, baseline characteristics were balanced using 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM). The study outcomes, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were compared between the two treatment groups.

Results: The study included 192 patients, with 106 in the PA-TACE alone group and 86 in the PA-TACE plus lenvatinib group. After PSM, 66 matched pairs were analyzed. The median OS and RFS in the PA-TACE plus lenvatinib group were significantly longer than those in the PA-TACE alone group (43.6 months vs 24.0 months, P = 0.015; and 19.6 months vs 10.2 months, P = 0.025, respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed that PA-TACE plus lenvatinib was an independent protective factor for both OS and RFS.

Conclusions: The combination of PA-TACE and lenvatinib significantly improves survival outcomes in HCC patients with MVI following curative liver resection compared to PA-TACE alone. These findings suggest that this combined approach may be a more effective adjuvant therapy for this high-risk patient population. Further studies are necessary to validate these results and establish clinical guidelines.

辅助经动脉化疗栓塞加lenvatinib治疗肝癌合并MVI术后患者:一项多中心回顾性研究。
背景:微血管侵犯(MVI)是影响肝细胞癌(HCC)患者长期生存的关键预后因素。尽管具有临床意义,但HCC合并MVI患者的最佳术后辅助治疗仍未明确。本研究旨在评价肝细胞癌合并MVI患者术后辅助经动脉化疗栓塞(PA-TACE)联合lenvatinib与单独PA-TACE的疗效和安全性。方法:我们对2018年至2022年期间连续接受治疗意图切除后单独使用PA-TACE或PA-TACE加lenvatinib的肝癌合并MVI患者进行了回顾性分析。为了确保可比性,基线特征使用1:1倾向-得分匹配(PSM)进行平衡。比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。结果:共纳入192例患者,其中单独使用PA-TACE组106例,PA-TACE联合lenvatinib组86例。经PSM分析66对配对。PA-TACE联合lenvatinib组的中位OS和RFS均显著高于单独使用PA-TACE组(43.6个月vs 24.0个月,P = 0.015;19.6个月vs 10.2个月,P = 0.025)。多变量分析证实,PA-TACE + lenvatinib是OS和RFS的独立保护因素。结论:与单独使用PA-TACE相比,PA-TACE联合lenvatinib可显著改善HCC合并MVI患者根治性肝切除术后的生存结果。这些发现表明,这种联合方法可能是一种更有效的辅助治疗高危患者人群。需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果并建立临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信