Response to Induction Chemotherapy as a Predictor of Clinical Outcome After Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Mayank Soni, Sweety Gupta, Abhishek Chakravarty, Aviral Rastogi, Nitin Kumar, Shrutikant Bhatia, Deepa M Joseph, Manoj Gupta
{"title":"Response to Induction Chemotherapy as a Predictor of Clinical Outcome After Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mayank Soni, Sweety Gupta, Abhishek Chakravarty, Aviral Rastogi, Nitin Kumar, Shrutikant Bhatia, Deepa M Joseph, Manoj Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s12070-025-05538-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma. Induction chemotherapy is given to reduce locoregional relapse, distant metastases and tumor shrinkage. Response to induction chemotherapy can predict response to radiotherapy, but impact of IC response to survival benefit after radical treatment is less studied.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of patients with locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiotherapy. Clinico-radiological response to induction chemotherapy was recorded and further subjected to chemoradiotherapy. Overall, Disease free and distant metastasis free survival were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>116 patients received induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiotherapy. Post induction chemotherapy, response(down-stage) was, 48(41.37%) for T-stage, 46(36.65%) for N-stage and 45(38.79%) for Stage group, respectively. On follow up after chemoradiotherapy, 52(44.8%) had complete response, 61(52.6%) had failure of treatment, and 3(2.6%) died within three months. With median overall survival of 18.89 months, median follow up was of 10.8 months. Univariate analysis indicated significant benefits in Disease free survival for T-stage response (<i>p</i> < 0.04), but not for N-stage (<i>p</i> = 0.25) or stage group (<i>p</i> = 0.11). However, multivariate analysis identified stage group response as statistically significant predictor overall survival (<i>p - </i>0.04, HR<i> - </i>0.538). In subset analysis, younger population (< 50 year), despite being non-responder had significant benefit in distant metastasis free survival status (<i>p - </i>0.04). For subsite, hypopharyngeal malignancies had significant benefit in overall survival status for N-stage (<i>p - </i>0.002) and stage group (<i>p - </i>0.008), and for laryngeal malignancies significant benefit in disease free survival status for T-stage response (<i>p - </i>0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma, response to induction chemotherapy can be viewed as an indicator of potential survival benefit. Role of induction chemotherapy is recommended for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies, to preserve organ-function along with enhanced survival rates. In younger patients, even if they are non-responders, induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiation is a viable option that may improve locoregional, and distant control of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"77 7","pages":"2514-2522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05538-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma. Induction chemotherapy is given to reduce locoregional relapse, distant metastases and tumor shrinkage. Response to induction chemotherapy can predict response to radiotherapy, but impact of IC response to survival benefit after radical treatment is less studied.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiotherapy. Clinico-radiological response to induction chemotherapy was recorded and further subjected to chemoradiotherapy. Overall, Disease free and distant metastasis free survival were analysed.

Results: 116 patients received induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiotherapy. Post induction chemotherapy, response(down-stage) was, 48(41.37%) for T-stage, 46(36.65%) for N-stage and 45(38.79%) for Stage group, respectively. On follow up after chemoradiotherapy, 52(44.8%) had complete response, 61(52.6%) had failure of treatment, and 3(2.6%) died within three months. With median overall survival of 18.89 months, median follow up was of 10.8 months. Univariate analysis indicated significant benefits in Disease free survival for T-stage response (p < 0.04), but not for N-stage (p = 0.25) or stage group (p = 0.11). However, multivariate analysis identified stage group response as statistically significant predictor overall survival (p - 0.04, HR - 0.538). In subset analysis, younger population (< 50 year), despite being non-responder had significant benefit in distant metastasis free survival status (p - 0.04). For subsite, hypopharyngeal malignancies had significant benefit in overall survival status for N-stage (p - 0.002) and stage group (p - 0.008), and for laryngeal malignancies significant benefit in disease free survival status for T-stage response (p - 0.03).

Conclusion: In locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma, response to induction chemotherapy can be viewed as an indicator of potential survival benefit. Role of induction chemotherapy is recommended for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies, to preserve organ-function along with enhanced survival rates. In younger patients, even if they are non-responders, induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiation is a viable option that may improve locoregional, and distant control of the disease.

对诱导化疗的反应作为局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者放化疗后临床结果的预测因子:一项回顾性研究
简介:同步放化疗是局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的标准治疗方法。给予诱导化疗以减少局部复发、远处转移和肿瘤缩小。诱导化疗反应可以预测放疗反应,但IC反应对根治性治疗后生存获益的影响研究较少。材料和方法:我们对局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者接受了诱导化疗和根治性放化疗。记录诱导化疗的临床放射反应,并进一步进行放化疗。总的来说,无疾病和无远处转移的生存分析。结果:116例患者行诱导化疗后根治性放化疗。诱导化疗后,t期48例(41.37%),n期46例(36.65%),分期组45例(38.79%)。放化疗后随访,完全缓解52例(44.8%),治疗失败61例(52.6%),3个月内死亡3例(2.6%)。中位总生存期为18.89个月,中位随访期为10.8个月。单因素分析显示,t期反应(p p = 0.25)或分期组(p = 0.11)的无病生存率显著提高。然而,多变量分析发现,分期组反应是总生存的统计学显著预测因子(p - 0.04, HR - 0.538)。在亚群分析中,年轻人群(p - 0.04)。对于亚位点,下咽恶性肿瘤在n期(p - 0.002)和分期组(p - 0.008)的总生存状态上有显著的获益,对于喉部恶性肿瘤在t期应答的无病生存状态上有显著的获益(p - 0.03)。结论:在局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌中,对诱导化疗的反应可被视为潜在生存获益的指标。引导性化疗的作用是推荐喉和下咽恶性肿瘤,以保持器官功能和提高生存率。在年轻患者中,即使他们没有反应,诱导化疗联合同步放化疗是一种可行的选择,可以改善局部区域和疾病的远程控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress. IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc. The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world. The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members. Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信