Pharmacogenetic Approaches to Optimize Bioequivalence Studies in Generic Drug Development.

IF 2.9 4区 医学
Jihyun Bae, Jihong Shon, Myong-Jin Kim, Karen Li
{"title":"Pharmacogenetic Approaches to Optimize Bioequivalence Studies in Generic Drug Development.","authors":"Jihyun Bae, Jihong Shon, Myong-Jin Kim, Karen Li","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the significant impacts of interindividual genetic variability on drug safety and pharmacokinetics, integrating pharmacogenetic (PGx) considerations into pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) study design can improve subject safety and data robustness in generic drug development. While PGx information has been often utilized in new drug development, its use in generic drug development has not been fully considered. To understand the current landscape of its utility in generic drug development, product-specific guidances (PSGs) from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) containing PGx information were reviewed, along with study protocols submitted by generic drug applicants under abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) or controlled correspondences for the identified reference listed drugs (RLDs). Fifteen PSGs (15 RLDs) recommended PGx information as a consideration factor for subject population selection, particularly for drugs associated with inherited enzyme deficiencies or cytochrome P450 polymorphism. The PGx-based considerations in these PSGs aimed to prevent serious adverse events (60%), optimize PK BE study design (7%), or address both factors (33%). Among the 15 RLDs, 5 had submitted ANDAs or correspondences with PK BE study protocols after their respective PSGs were published. Most of these submissions aligned with the PSG recommendations, incorporating PGx-related exclusion criteria. These findings suggest that while the number of submissions is low, generic drug developers are increasingly integrating PGx considerations in PK BE studies, recognizing its potential to enhance safety and efficiency in generic drug development. Continuing efforts from both regulators and industry are critical to expand its application to other drug candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the significant impacts of interindividual genetic variability on drug safety and pharmacokinetics, integrating pharmacogenetic (PGx) considerations into pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) study design can improve subject safety and data robustness in generic drug development. While PGx information has been often utilized in new drug development, its use in generic drug development has not been fully considered. To understand the current landscape of its utility in generic drug development, product-specific guidances (PSGs) from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) containing PGx information were reviewed, along with study protocols submitted by generic drug applicants under abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) or controlled correspondences for the identified reference listed drugs (RLDs). Fifteen PSGs (15 RLDs) recommended PGx information as a consideration factor for subject population selection, particularly for drugs associated with inherited enzyme deficiencies or cytochrome P450 polymorphism. The PGx-based considerations in these PSGs aimed to prevent serious adverse events (60%), optimize PK BE study design (7%), or address both factors (33%). Among the 15 RLDs, 5 had submitted ANDAs or correspondences with PK BE study protocols after their respective PSGs were published. Most of these submissions aligned with the PSG recommendations, incorporating PGx-related exclusion criteria. These findings suggest that while the number of submissions is low, generic drug developers are increasingly integrating PGx considerations in PK BE studies, recognizing its potential to enhance safety and efficiency in generic drug development. Continuing efforts from both regulators and industry are critical to expand its application to other drug candidates.

优化仿制药开发中生物等效性研究的药物遗传学方法。
鉴于个体间遗传变异对药物安全性和药代动力学的重大影响,将药物遗传学(PGx)考虑纳入药代动力学(PK)生物等效性(BE)研究设计可以提高仿制药开发中的受试者安全性和数据稳健性。虽然PGx信息经常用于新药开发,但其在仿制药开发中的应用尚未得到充分考虑。为了了解其在仿制药开发中的应用现状,我们审查了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)提供的含有PGx信息的产品特定指南(psg),以及仿制药申请人根据简略新药申请(anda)或已确定参考上市药物(rld)的对照信函提交的研究方案。15个psg(15个rld)推荐PGx信息作为受试者群体选择的考虑因素,特别是与遗传性酶缺陷或细胞色素P450多态性相关的药物。这些psg中基于pgx的考虑旨在预防严重不良事件(60%),优化PK BE研究设计(7%),或同时解决这两个因素(33%)。在15个rld中,有5个在各自的psg发表后提交了anda或与PK BE研究方案的通信。这些意见书中的大多数与PSG建议一致,纳入了与pgx相关的排除标准。这些发现表明,虽然提交的数量较少,但仿制药开发商越来越多地将PGx纳入PK BE研究,认识到其提高仿制药开发安全性和效率的潜力。监管机构和行业的持续努力对于将其应用于其他候选药物至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信