Long-Term Effectiveness Associated With Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Early-Age Screening.

IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Han-Mo Chiu, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chiu-Wen Su, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Wen-Feng Hsu, Chen-Yang Hsu, Ting-Yu Lin, Yi-Chia Lee, Ming-Shiang Wu, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
{"title":"Long-Term Effectiveness Associated With Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Early-Age Screening.","authors":"Han-Mo Chiu, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chiu-Wen Su, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Wen-Feng Hsu, Chen-Yang Hsu, Ting-Yu Lin, Yi-Chia Lee, Ming-Shiang Wu, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The rising incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted health policymakers to consider lowering the recommended starting age for screening. However, population-based evidence supporting the long-term effectiveness of early-age screening remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether initiating fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening at ages 40 to 49 years, rather than at the currently recommended age of 50 years, reduces CRC incidence and mortality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This study analyzed a community-based screening cohort of Taiwanese residents aged 40 to 49 years, categorized into 4 subcohorts based on participation in early screening (age 40 to 49 years) and continuation of nationwide regular screening (50 years and older). The cohort was followed up until 2019 to compare CRC incidence and mortality across subcohorts. To mitigate self-selection bias, a delayed screening design and efficient propensity score matching was used, restricting analyses to participants attending regular screening. To validate the findings, an extended nonadherence adjustment was applied to all 4 subcohorts. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2019, and data were analyzed from January 2021 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Biennial FIT screening was initiated for the early screening group at ages 40 to 49 years and for the regular screening group at age 50 years, with follow-up continuing under Taiwan's national screening program.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality rates, reported as cases per 100 000 person-years, with adjusted relative risks (aRRs) comparing early vs regular screening groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 263 125 included participants, 146 796 (55.8%) were female. A total of 39 315 participated in early and regular screening, and 223 810 participated in regular screening only. The early screening group exhibited lower CRC incidence (26.1 [95% CI, 22.3-29.9] vs 42.6 [95% CI, 40.5-44.7] per 100 000 person-years) and mortality (3.2 [95% CI, 1.9-4.6] vs 7.4 [95% CI, 6.5-8.2] per 100 000 person-years). In propensity score-matched analyses, early screening significantly reduced CRC incidence (aRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94) and mortality (aRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98). Findings were consistent in the extended nonadherence adjustment model, showing a 25% reduction in incidence (aRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.77) and a 34% reduction in mortality (aRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that initiating FIT screening at age 40 to 49 years was associated with further reduction in CRC mortality and incidence compared with starting screening at age 50 years. These results provide strong empirical support for lowering the CRC screening age, with substantial public health implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The rising incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted health policymakers to consider lowering the recommended starting age for screening. However, population-based evidence supporting the long-term effectiveness of early-age screening remains limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether initiating fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening at ages 40 to 49 years, rather than at the currently recommended age of 50 years, reduces CRC incidence and mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: This study analyzed a community-based screening cohort of Taiwanese residents aged 40 to 49 years, categorized into 4 subcohorts based on participation in early screening (age 40 to 49 years) and continuation of nationwide regular screening (50 years and older). The cohort was followed up until 2019 to compare CRC incidence and mortality across subcohorts. To mitigate self-selection bias, a delayed screening design and efficient propensity score matching was used, restricting analyses to participants attending regular screening. To validate the findings, an extended nonadherence adjustment was applied to all 4 subcohorts. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2019, and data were analyzed from January 2021 to December 2024.

Exposures: Biennial FIT screening was initiated for the early screening group at ages 40 to 49 years and for the regular screening group at age 50 years, with follow-up continuing under Taiwan's national screening program.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality rates, reported as cases per 100 000 person-years, with adjusted relative risks (aRRs) comparing early vs regular screening groups.

Results: Of 263 125 included participants, 146 796 (55.8%) were female. A total of 39 315 participated in early and regular screening, and 223 810 participated in regular screening only. The early screening group exhibited lower CRC incidence (26.1 [95% CI, 22.3-29.9] vs 42.6 [95% CI, 40.5-44.7] per 100 000 person-years) and mortality (3.2 [95% CI, 1.9-4.6] vs 7.4 [95% CI, 6.5-8.2] per 100 000 person-years). In propensity score-matched analyses, early screening significantly reduced CRC incidence (aRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94) and mortality (aRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98). Findings were consistent in the extended nonadherence adjustment model, showing a 25% reduction in incidence (aRR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.77) and a 34% reduction in mortality (aRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that initiating FIT screening at age 40 to 49 years was associated with further reduction in CRC mortality and incidence compared with starting screening at age 50 years. These results provide strong empirical support for lowering the CRC screening age, with substantial public health implications.

粪便免疫化学检测在早期筛查中的长期有效性。
重要性:年轻发病的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率的上升促使卫生政策制定者考虑降低推荐的筛查起始年龄。然而,支持早期筛查长期有效性的基于人群的证据仍然有限。目的:评价在40 - 49岁开始粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)筛查,而不是目前推荐的50岁,是否能降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。设计、环境和参与者:本研究分析了40至49岁台湾居民的社区筛查队列,根据参与早期筛查(40至49岁)和继续进行全国定期筛查(50岁及以上)分为4个亚队列。该队列随访至2019年,以比较各亚队列的CRC发病率和死亡率。为了减轻自我选择偏差,采用延迟筛选设计和有效倾向评分匹配,将分析限制在定期参加筛选的参与者。为了验证研究结果,对所有4个亚队列应用了延长的不依从调整。数据收集时间为2001年1月至2019年12月,分析时间为2021年1月至2024年12月。​主要结局和措施:主要结局是CRC发病率和死亡率,报告为每10万 000人年的病例数,并比较早期和常规筛查组的调整相对风险(arr)。结果:263名 125名纳入受试者,146名 796名(55.8%)为女性。39名 315人参加了早期和定期筛查,223名 810人只参加了定期筛查。早期筛查组CRC发病率(26.1 [95% CI, 22.3-29.9] vs 42.6 [95% CI, 40.5-44.7] / 100 000人年)和死亡率(3.2 [95% CI, 1.9-4.6] vs 7.4 [95% CI, 6.5-8.2] / 100 000人年)较低。在倾向评分匹配分析中,早期筛查显著降低了CRC发病率(aRR, 0.79;95% CI, 0.67-0.94)和死亡率(aRR, 0.61;95% ci, 0.38-0.98)。结果与扩展不依从调整模型一致,显示发生率降低25% (aRR, 0.75;95% CI, 0.72-0.77),死亡率降低34% (aRR, 0.66;95% ci, 0.62-0.71)。结论和相关性:本研究发现,与50岁开始筛查相比,在40至49岁开始筛查与CRC死亡率和发病率的进一步降低相关。这些结果为降低结直肠癌筛查年龄提供了强有力的实证支持,具有重大的公共卫生意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信