The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact among vulnerable populations in England: a controlled interrupted time series study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017
Scott R Walter, Chris Salisbury, Lauren J Scott, Frank de Vocht, John Macleod, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Helen J Curtis, Aziz Sheikh, Srinivasa V Katikireddi, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian Bacon, George Hickman, Ben Goldacre, Maria T Redaniel
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact among vulnerable populations in England: a controlled interrupted time series study.","authors":"Scott R Walter, Chris Salisbury, Lauren J Scott, Frank de Vocht, John Macleod, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Helen J Curtis, Aziz Sheikh, Srinivasa V Katikireddi, Amir Mehrkar, Sebastian Bacon, George Hickman, Ben Goldacre, Maria T Redaniel","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>UK COVID-19 lockdowns significantly affected primary care access and delivery. Little is known about whether lockdowns disproportionally impacted vulnerable groups, including people who misuse substances, domestic violence or abuse victims, those with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of UK COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact rates among vulnerable groups.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Natural experimental design using all registered patients in the OpenSAFELY platform.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>With approval from NHS England, we conducted controlled interrupted time-series analyses on 24million patients in England between September2019-September2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pandemic, primary care consultation rates were 110.1 per 1000 patients per week. Following the initiation of the first lockdown (23/03/2020), there was a large reduction of 29-61 contacts per 1000 patients per week among vulnerable and general population groups. For patients with alcohol misuse, aged ≥14 years with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns, this reduction was significantly more extreme than corresponding general populations (relative rate difference -23.8 [95% confidence interval -39.8,-7.7], -24.6 [-38.8,-10.5], and -15.4 [-26.9,-3.8], respectively). Following the final lockdown (29/03/2021), all groups had consulting rates exceeding pre-pandemic rates (with increases more marked in vulnerable populations), except those only including children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analyses suggested a larger short-term impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on primary care contact for some vulnerable groups, compared to the general population; differential impacts persisted through subsequent lockdowns and beyond for some vulnerable groups. There is a need to examine drivers of these differences to enable more equitable primary care access and provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: UK COVID-19 lockdowns significantly affected primary care access and delivery. Little is known about whether lockdowns disproportionally impacted vulnerable groups, including people who misuse substances, domestic violence or abuse victims, those with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of UK COVID-19 lockdowns on primary care contact rates among vulnerable groups.

Design & setting: Natural experimental design using all registered patients in the OpenSAFELY platform.

Method: With approval from NHS England, we conducted controlled interrupted time-series analyses on 24million patients in England between September2019-September2021.

Results: Pre-pandemic, primary care consultation rates were 110.1 per 1000 patients per week. Following the initiation of the first lockdown (23/03/2020), there was a large reduction of 29-61 contacts per 1000 patients per week among vulnerable and general population groups. For patients with alcohol misuse, aged ≥14 years with intellectual disability, and children with safeguarding concerns, this reduction was significantly more extreme than corresponding general populations (relative rate difference -23.8 [95% confidence interval -39.8,-7.7], -24.6 [-38.8,-10.5], and -15.4 [-26.9,-3.8], respectively). Following the final lockdown (29/03/2021), all groups had consulting rates exceeding pre-pandemic rates (with increases more marked in vulnerable populations), except those only including children.

Conclusion: Analyses suggested a larger short-term impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on primary care contact for some vulnerable groups, compared to the general population; differential impacts persisted through subsequent lockdowns and beyond for some vulnerable groups. There is a need to examine drivers of these differences to enable more equitable primary care access and provision.

COVID-19封锁对英格兰弱势群体初级保健接触的影响:一项受控中断时间序列研究
背景:英国COVID-19封锁严重影响了初级保健的获取和提供。人们对封锁是否不成比例地影响弱势群体知之甚少,包括滥用药物者、家庭暴力或虐待受害者、智力残疾者和有保障问题的儿童。目的:评估英国COVID-19封锁对弱势群体初级保健接触率的影响。设计与设置:采用opensafety平台中所有注册患者的自然实验设计。方法:经英国国家医疗服务体系批准,我们在2019年9月至2021年9月期间对英国2400万患者进行了对照中断时间序列分析。结果:大流行前,初级保健咨询率为每1000名患者每周110.1次。自第一次封城(2020年3月23日)启动以来,弱势群体和一般人群每周每1000名患者的接触人数大幅减少29-61人。对于酒精滥用患者、≥14岁智力残疾患者和有安全顾虑的儿童,这种降低明显比相应的一般人群更为极端(相对比率差异分别为-23.8[95%置信区间-39.8,-7.7]、-24.6[-38.8,-10.5]和-15.4[-26.9,-3.8])。在最后一次封锁之后(2021年3月29日),所有群体的咨询率都超过了大流行前的水平(弱势群体的增长更为明显),但只包括儿童的群体除外。结论:分析表明,与一般人群相比,第一次COVID-19封锁对一些弱势群体初级保健接触的短期影响更大;对一些弱势群体来说,不同的影响在随后的封锁期间和之后仍然存在。有必要审查这些差异的驱动因素,以实现更公平的初级保健获取和提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信