Efficacy of Airway Management Protocol for Cervical Anterior Surgery, Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion, and Intramedullary Tumor Resection.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2024-0182
Narihito Nagoshi, Kohei Matsubayashi, Osahiko Tsuji, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Toshiki Okubo, Kazuki Takeda, Hiromasa Nagata, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe
{"title":"Efficacy of Airway Management Protocol for Cervical Anterior Surgery, Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion, and Intramedullary Tumor Resection.","authors":"Narihito Nagoshi, Kohei Matsubayashi, Osahiko Tsuji, Masahiro Ozaki, Satoshi Suzuki, Toshiki Okubo, Kazuki Takeda, Hiromasa Nagata, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2024-0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical interventions for cervical spine and spinal cord diseases may lead to life-threatening postoperative airway obstruction, requiring urgent airway management. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of our respiratory management protocol for patients undergoing anterior cervical approaches, posterior occipitocervical fusion, and intramedullary tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study consisted of 497 patients who underwent cervical surgeries, including anterior fusion, posterior occipitocervical fusion, combined anterior and posterior fusions, and intramedullary tumor resection between January 2006 and June 2022. Our institution implemented a specific postoperative airway management protocol from September 2014 onward. The protocol involved continued intubation for at least the first postoperative night, followed by a spontaneous breathing trial with a cuff leak test and extubation one or more days after surgery. We compared the outcomes between the pre-protocol period (non-protocol group, n=234) and the protocol period (protocol group, n=263).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences regarding demographic, clinical, or surgical details. In the non-protocol group, four subjects required reintubation because of postoperative airway complications (anterior fusion: 1 patient, posterior occipitocervical fusion: 1 patient, and intramedullary tumor resection: 2 patients). After the airway protocol implementation, the reintubation rate dropped to zero (<i>P</i>=0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our airway management protocol substantially reduced the need for reintubation. These findings emphasize the importance of postoperative respiratory management after cervical spine surgeries and underscore the need for appropriate measures to prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"9 3","pages":"300-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical interventions for cervical spine and spinal cord diseases may lead to life-threatening postoperative airway obstruction, requiring urgent airway management. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of our respiratory management protocol for patients undergoing anterior cervical approaches, posterior occipitocervical fusion, and intramedullary tumor resection.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study consisted of 497 patients who underwent cervical surgeries, including anterior fusion, posterior occipitocervical fusion, combined anterior and posterior fusions, and intramedullary tumor resection between January 2006 and June 2022. Our institution implemented a specific postoperative airway management protocol from September 2014 onward. The protocol involved continued intubation for at least the first postoperative night, followed by a spontaneous breathing trial with a cuff leak test and extubation one or more days after surgery. We compared the outcomes between the pre-protocol period (non-protocol group, n=234) and the protocol period (protocol group, n=263).

Results: There were no significant between-group differences regarding demographic, clinical, or surgical details. In the non-protocol group, four subjects required reintubation because of postoperative airway complications (anterior fusion: 1 patient, posterior occipitocervical fusion: 1 patient, and intramedullary tumor resection: 2 patients). After the airway protocol implementation, the reintubation rate dropped to zero (P=0.048).

Conclusions: Our airway management protocol substantially reduced the need for reintubation. These findings emphasize the importance of postoperative respiratory management after cervical spine surgeries and underscore the need for appropriate measures to prevent complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颈椎前路手术、枕颈后路融合术和髓内肿瘤切除术的气道管理方案的疗效。
颈椎和脊髓疾病的手术干预可能导致危及生命的术后气道阻塞,需要紧急气道管理。本研究旨在评估我们的呼吸管理方案对颈椎前路入路、后枕颈融合和髓内肿瘤切除术患者的可行性和有效性。方法:本单中心回顾性研究纳入了2006年1月至2022年6月间497例颈椎手术患者,包括前路融合术、枕颈后路融合术、前后路联合融合术和髓内肿瘤切除术。我院自2014年9月起实施了具体的术后气道管理方案。该方案包括至少在术后第一个晚上继续插管,随后进行自发呼吸试验,包括袖带泄漏试验和术后一天或多天拔管。我们比较了方案前(非方案组,n=234)和方案期(方案组,n=263)的结果。结果:在人口统计学、临床或手术细节方面,组间无显著差异。在非方案组中,4例患者因术后气道并发症需要重新插管(前路融合1例,枕颈后路融合1例,髓内肿瘤切除术2例)。气道方案实施后,再插管率降至零(P=0.048)。结论:我们的气道管理方案大大减少了再插管的需要。这些发现强调了颈椎手术后呼吸管理的重要性,并强调了采取适当措施预防并发症的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信