The State of Person-Centered Measurement for Family Planning Need and Use: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Ilene S Speizer, Elizabeth A Sully, Youmna M Hashem, Maame Araba A Oduro
{"title":"The State of Person-Centered Measurement for Family Planning Need and Use: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ilene S Speizer, Elizabeth A Sully, Youmna M Hashem, Maame Araba A Oduro","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard measures used to assess family planning (FP) program success, including unmet need and demand satisfied, fail to capture women's, men's, couples', and adolescents' own expressed preferences, needs, wants, and desires. Identification is needed of person-centered fertility and FP measures that assess what individuals want, desire, need, and prefer without a researcher-ascribed value of what is the right outcome. This scoping review examines how the concept of person-centeredness has been employed as part of population-based FP measurement. For this review, we defined measures as person-centered if they assess directly a person's preferences, wants, and desires while at the same time assessing if the person can or wants to meet those preferences, wants, and desires. The review finds several studies that use or adapt standard measures of intention to use contraception and unmet need; however, a smaller number develop novel approaches that capture method preferences and satisfaction with methods to better capture individuals' needs, wants, and desires as well as their ability to attain these needs, wants, and desires. Results are used to make recommendations going forward for the design and testing of improved person-centered FP measurement at the global, national, and programmatic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard measures used to assess family planning (FP) program success, including unmet need and demand satisfied, fail to capture women's, men's, couples', and adolescents' own expressed preferences, needs, wants, and desires. Identification is needed of person-centered fertility and FP measures that assess what individuals want, desire, need, and prefer without a researcher-ascribed value of what is the right outcome. This scoping review examines how the concept of person-centeredness has been employed as part of population-based FP measurement. For this review, we defined measures as person-centered if they assess directly a person's preferences, wants, and desires while at the same time assessing if the person can or wants to meet those preferences, wants, and desires. The review finds several studies that use or adapt standard measures of intention to use contraception and unmet need; however, a smaller number develop novel approaches that capture method preferences and satisfaction with methods to better capture individuals' needs, wants, and desires as well as their ability to attain these needs, wants, and desires. Results are used to make recommendations going forward for the design and testing of improved person-centered FP measurement at the global, national, and programmatic levels.

以人为本的计划生育需求和使用测量现状:范围综述。
用于评估计划生育(FP)项目成功的标准措施,包括未满足的需求和满足的需求,未能捕捉到女性、男性、夫妇和青少年自己表达的偏好、需求、愿望和愿望。需要确定以人为中心的生育和计划生育措施,这些措施评估个人想要,渴望,需要和偏好,而没有研究人员认为什么是正确结果的价值。这一范围审查审查了以人为中心的概念是如何被用作基于人口的计划生育测量的一部分。在这篇综述中,我们将测量方法定义为以人为本,如果它们直接评估一个人的偏好、需求和欲望,同时评估这个人是否能够或想要满足这些偏好、需求和欲望。本综述发现有几项研究使用或调整了使用避孕意向和未满足需求的标准措施;然而,少数人开发了新的方法来捕捉方法偏好和满足的方法,以更好地捕捉个人的需求、欲望和欲望,以及他们实现这些需求、欲望和欲望的能力。研究结果用于为今后在全球、国家和规划层面设计和测试改进的以人为本的计划生育测量方法提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信