Does Ischemic Preconditioning of the Operative Limb Reduce Pain After Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251343762
Caitlin Orner, Andrew Usoro, Brooke Bergeron, Michael Banffy
{"title":"Does Ischemic Preconditioning of the Operative Limb Reduce Pain After Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Caitlin Orner, Andrew Usoro, Brooke Bergeron, Michael Banffy","doi":"10.1177/23259671251343762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) involves brief periods of circulatory occlusion and reperfusion to stimulate protective effects on tissues. Studies on IPC prior to knee surgery have shown improvements in postoperative pain and decreased opioid consumption. Through a combination of neural and circulating humoral factors, IPC has also been shown to have systemic effects outside the area of ischemia.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether preoperative IPC of the operative limb at the thigh affects postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement or labral tear were prospectively enrolled and randomized to IPC or control groups. Limb preconditioning was performed within 24 hours before surgery using the Delphi Personalized Tourniquet System with the cuff on the proximal thigh. The IPC group received a 30-minute treatment consisting of 3 rounds of 5 minutes at limb occlusion pressure alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion. The control group received the same protocol at 20% of limb occlusion pressure. Arthroscopy was performed according to standard of care. Surveys were administered through RedCap starting the day of surgery through postoperative day 7. Patients were asked to rate their pain from 0 to 10 with the visual analog scale (VAS) and to record use of pain medication. Statistical analysis included chi-square and <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients (34 IPC, 34 control) were enrolled. Demographic characteristics and specific surgical procedures were similar between groups. Survey compliance was higher in the IPC group than the control group, 6.3 ± 2.7 days versus 3.7 ± 3.38 days, respectively (<i>P</i> < .05). Both groups reported significant reductions in their VAS pain scores from the day of surgery to postoperative day 7 (<i>P</i> < .05). No significant difference was found between the groups in VAS pain scores at any time point. No significant difference was found between the groups in mean daily opioid consumption (expressed as morphine milligram equivalents) or acetaminophen consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPC of the operative limb at the thigh did not appear to decrease pain scores or pain medication use after hip arthroscopy. This study suggests that although IPC of the limb at the level of the thigh may be useful for some orthopaedic procedures, it may not have a significantly beneficial effect for hip arthroscopy patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>NCT04925791 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"23259671251343762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251343762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) involves brief periods of circulatory occlusion and reperfusion to stimulate protective effects on tissues. Studies on IPC prior to knee surgery have shown improvements in postoperative pain and decreased opioid consumption. Through a combination of neural and circulating humoral factors, IPC has also been shown to have systemic effects outside the area of ischemia.

Purpose: To determine whether preoperative IPC of the operative limb at the thigh affects postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement or labral tear were prospectively enrolled and randomized to IPC or control groups. Limb preconditioning was performed within 24 hours before surgery using the Delphi Personalized Tourniquet System with the cuff on the proximal thigh. The IPC group received a 30-minute treatment consisting of 3 rounds of 5 minutes at limb occlusion pressure alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion. The control group received the same protocol at 20% of limb occlusion pressure. Arthroscopy was performed according to standard of care. Surveys were administered through RedCap starting the day of surgery through postoperative day 7. Patients were asked to rate their pain from 0 to 10 with the visual analog scale (VAS) and to record use of pain medication. Statistical analysis included chi-square and t tests.

Results: A total of 68 patients (34 IPC, 34 control) were enrolled. Demographic characteristics and specific surgical procedures were similar between groups. Survey compliance was higher in the IPC group than the control group, 6.3 ± 2.7 days versus 3.7 ± 3.38 days, respectively (P < .05). Both groups reported significant reductions in their VAS pain scores from the day of surgery to postoperative day 7 (P < .05). No significant difference was found between the groups in VAS pain scores at any time point. No significant difference was found between the groups in mean daily opioid consumption (expressed as morphine milligram equivalents) or acetaminophen consumption.

Conclusion: IPC of the operative limb at the thigh did not appear to decrease pain scores or pain medication use after hip arthroscopy. This study suggests that although IPC of the limb at the level of the thigh may be useful for some orthopaedic procedures, it may not have a significantly beneficial effect for hip arthroscopy patients.

Registration: NCT04925791 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

手术肢体缺血预处理能减轻髋关节镜术后疼痛吗?一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。
背景:缺血预处理(IPC)涉及短时间的循环闭塞和再灌注,以刺激对组织的保护作用。膝关节手术前IPC的研究表明,术后疼痛得到改善,阿片类药物消耗减少。通过神经和循环体液因子的结合,IPC也被证明在缺血区域外具有全身性作用。目的:确定术前大腿手术肢体的IPC是否影响髋关节镜术后疼痛评分或阿片类药物的消耗。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据等级:1。方法:前瞻性纳入接受髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击或唇部撕裂的成年患者,随机分为IPC组和对照组。术前24小时内采用德尔福个性化止血带系统进行肢体预处理,绑带在大腿近端。IPC组接受30分钟的治疗,包括3轮5分钟的肢体闭塞压和5分钟的再灌注交替进行。对照组采用相同的方案,在20%的肢体闭塞压力下。按照标准护理进行关节镜检查。从手术当天到术后第7天,通过RedCap进行调查。患者被要求用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对他们的疼痛进行从0到10的评分,并记录止痛药的使用情况。统计分析包括卡方检验和t检验。结果:共纳入68例患者(IPC 34例,对照组34例)。两组人口统计学特征和具体手术方法相似。IPC组调查依从性高于对照组,分别为6.3±2.7天和3.7±3.38天(P < 0.05)。两组患者的VAS疼痛评分从手术当天到术后第7天均显著降低(P < 0.05)。各组间VAS疼痛评分各时间点均无显著差异。各组之间的平均每日阿片类药物消费量(以吗啡毫克当量表示)或对乙酰氨基酚消费量没有显着差异。结论:股骨处手术肢体的IPC并没有减少髋关节镜术后疼痛评分或止痛药的使用。这项研究表明,尽管大腿水平肢体的IPC可能对某些矫形手术有用,但对髋关节镜患者可能没有明显的有益作用。注册:NCT04925791 (ClinicalTrials.gov标识符)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信