Gloria Y F Ho, Daniel B Horton, Parin J Patel, Tobias Gerhard, Chintan V Dave
{"title":"Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Arrest Among Older Patients Using Lamotrigine for Epilepsy.","authors":"Gloria Y F Ho, Daniel B Horton, Parin J Patel, Tobias Gerhard, Chintan V Dave","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lamotrigine, an antiseizure medication, blocks the activation of voltage-gated sodium channels and reduces the excitability of cardiomyocytes in vitro. Based on concerns for QT prolongation and case reports of arrhythmias among lamotrigine users, the US Food and Drug Administration placed a safety warning on lamotrigine's label in 2020. However, limited evidence exists on the cardiac risk of lamotrigine in patients with epilepsy. This study assessed whether lamotrigine users with epilepsy had an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac arrest (VA/SCA) compared with users of levetiracetam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study among Medicare-insured individuals aged 65 years or older with epilepsy (2007-2019). We identified new users of lamotrigine and levetiracetam without inpatient or emergency VA/SCA diagnosis in the 12-month continuous enrollment baseline period before initiation of treatment. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting derived from propensity scores based on baseline covariates, we compared adjusted incidence rates of inpatient or emergency VA/SCA events in lamotrigine vs levetiracetam users and estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazard regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort (mean age 77.6 years and 60.5% female) consisted of 11,786 new lamotrigine users and 147,130 new levetiracetam users. At baseline, lamotrigine users were younger and less likely to have cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities than the levetiracetam users. The incidence and HR of VA/SCA were not statistically higher among lamotrigine users (7.0 vs 8.2 per 1,000 person-years for the lamotrigine and levetiracetam users, respectively; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67-1.06). Secondary analyses stratified by baseline cardiac abnormalities showed significantly reduced risk among lamotrigine users in subgroups with baseline arrhythmia (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.80) or use of antiarrhythmic drugs (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In older adults with epilepsy, lamotrigine was not associated with an increased risk of VA/SCA compared with levetiracetam, including among those with underlying heart disease. Our findings do not support the reported cardiac risks associated with lamotrigine or the recent changes to its safety label.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"105 1","pages":"e213643"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Lamotrigine, an antiseizure medication, blocks the activation of voltage-gated sodium channels and reduces the excitability of cardiomyocytes in vitro. Based on concerns for QT prolongation and case reports of arrhythmias among lamotrigine users, the US Food and Drug Administration placed a safety warning on lamotrigine's label in 2020. However, limited evidence exists on the cardiac risk of lamotrigine in patients with epilepsy. This study assessed whether lamotrigine users with epilepsy had an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac arrest (VA/SCA) compared with users of levetiracetam.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study among Medicare-insured individuals aged 65 years or older with epilepsy (2007-2019). We identified new users of lamotrigine and levetiracetam without inpatient or emergency VA/SCA diagnosis in the 12-month continuous enrollment baseline period before initiation of treatment. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting derived from propensity scores based on baseline covariates, we compared adjusted incidence rates of inpatient or emergency VA/SCA events in lamotrigine vs levetiracetam users and estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazard regression.
Results: The study cohort (mean age 77.6 years and 60.5% female) consisted of 11,786 new lamotrigine users and 147,130 new levetiracetam users. At baseline, lamotrigine users were younger and less likely to have cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities than the levetiracetam users. The incidence and HR of VA/SCA were not statistically higher among lamotrigine users (7.0 vs 8.2 per 1,000 person-years for the lamotrigine and levetiracetam users, respectively; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67-1.06). Secondary analyses stratified by baseline cardiac abnormalities showed significantly reduced risk among lamotrigine users in subgroups with baseline arrhythmia (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.80) or use of antiarrhythmic drugs (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91).
Discussion: In older adults with epilepsy, lamotrigine was not associated with an increased risk of VA/SCA compared with levetiracetam, including among those with underlying heart disease. Our findings do not support the reported cardiac risks associated with lamotrigine or the recent changes to its safety label.
背景和目的:拉莫三嗪,一种抗癫痫药物,在体外阻断电压门控钠通道的激活,降低心肌细胞的兴奋性。基于对拉莫三嗪使用者QT间期延长和心律失常病例报告的担忧,美国食品和药物管理局于2020年在拉莫三嗪的标签上发布了安全警告。然而,关于拉莫三嗪对癫痫患者心脏风险的证据有限。本研究评估了与左乙拉西坦患者相比,癫痫患者拉莫三嗪是否增加了室性心律失常和心脏骤停(VA/SCA)的风险。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,对象是2007-2019年65岁及以上的医疗保险参保癫痫患者。在开始治疗前12个月的连续入组基线期中,我们确定了没有住院或紧急VA/SCA诊断的拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦的新使用者。使用基于基线协变量的倾向得分得出的治疗加权逆概率,我们比较了拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦使用者住院或急诊VA/SCA事件的调整发生率,并使用Cox比例风险回归估计了95% ci的调整风险比(hr)。结果:研究队列(平均年龄77.6岁,60.5%为女性)包括11786名新拉莫三嗪使用者和147130名新左乙拉西坦使用者。在基线时,拉莫三嗪使用者比左乙拉西坦使用者更年轻,患心血管和非心血管合并症的可能性更小。在拉莫三嗪使用者中,VA/SCA的发生率和HR没有统计学上的增高(拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦使用者分别为7.0 vs 8.2 / 1000人年);Hr 0.84, 95% ci 0.67-1.06)。根据基线心脏异常分层的二次分析显示,在基线心律失常亚组(HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.80)或使用抗心律失常药物(HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91)中,拉莫三嗪使用者的风险显著降低。讨论:在老年癫痫患者中,与左乙拉西坦相比,拉莫三嗪与VA/SCA风险增加无关,包括那些有潜在心脏病的患者。我们的研究结果不支持报道的与拉莫三嗪相关的心脏风险,也不支持最近对其安全标签的修改。
期刊介绍:
Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology.
As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content.
Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.