Safety and efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency versus pulse dose mode radiofrequency targeting the pudendal nerve in patients with pudendal neuralgia: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saeid Elsawy, Ahmed Fergani, Ragaa Herdan, Rasha Hamed, Yara H Abbas, Hamdi Abbas, Ahmed F Abdelatif
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency versus pulse dose mode radiofrequency targeting the pudendal nerve in patients with pudendal neuralgia: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Saeid Elsawy, Ahmed Fergani, Ragaa Herdan, Rasha Hamed, Yara H Abbas, Hamdi Abbas, Ahmed F Abdelatif","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18678-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pudendal neuralgia is a painful, neuropathic condition involving the pudendal nerve dermatome. It is a difficult-to-treat chronic pain disorder that affects both men and women equally. The aim of this study was to detect the efficacy and safety of two distinctive therapeutic types of radiofrequency: pulsed radiofrequency and pulse dose radiofrequency, as treatment modalities for cases of pudendal neuralgia, assessed by changes in the Visual Analogue Scale between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the one hundred patients enrolled for this study, 80 cases with pudendal neuralgia fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned into two groups: PRF Group, including 38 patients who underwent Pulsed radiofrequency, and PDRF Group, including 39 patients who underwent Pulse dose radiofrequency. The primary outcome was pain assessment using the visual analogue score, while the secondary outcome included the patient health questionnaire-9, the amount of postintervention drug utilization, and treatment adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two studied groups were matched for the basic demographic data. However, the difference in the mean VAS score was present over time within each group (P<0.05) but it was insignificant between the two groups at one hour, 48 hours, two weeks, one, three, and six months (P>0.05), PDRF Group showed a non-significant reduction in visual analogue score, compared to PRF Group. Additionally, there was a statistically significant reduction in patient health questionnaire-9 within each group over time, P<0.05. while between both groups at one, three, and six months, there was insignificant reduction among both groups (P>0.05) and more reduction in the PDRF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both pulsed radiofrequency and pulse dose radiofrequency were equally effective and safe as a treatment method for managing pudendal neuralgia cases. Considering both modalities in cases with proven pudendal neuralgia is valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"91 5","pages":"413-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18678-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pudendal neuralgia is a painful, neuropathic condition involving the pudendal nerve dermatome. It is a difficult-to-treat chronic pain disorder that affects both men and women equally. The aim of this study was to detect the efficacy and safety of two distinctive therapeutic types of radiofrequency: pulsed radiofrequency and pulse dose radiofrequency, as treatment modalities for cases of pudendal neuralgia, assessed by changes in the Visual Analogue Scale between the two groups.

Methods: Of the one hundred patients enrolled for this study, 80 cases with pudendal neuralgia fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned into two groups: PRF Group, including 38 patients who underwent Pulsed radiofrequency, and PDRF Group, including 39 patients who underwent Pulse dose radiofrequency. The primary outcome was pain assessment using the visual analogue score, while the secondary outcome included the patient health questionnaire-9, the amount of postintervention drug utilization, and treatment adverse events.

Results: The two studied groups were matched for the basic demographic data. However, the difference in the mean VAS score was present over time within each group (P<0.05) but it was insignificant between the two groups at one hour, 48 hours, two weeks, one, three, and six months (P>0.05), PDRF Group showed a non-significant reduction in visual analogue score, compared to PRF Group. Additionally, there was a statistically significant reduction in patient health questionnaire-9 within each group over time, P<0.05. while between both groups at one, three, and six months, there was insignificant reduction among both groups (P>0.05) and more reduction in the PDRF group.

Conclusions: Both pulsed radiofrequency and pulse dose radiofrequency were equally effective and safe as a treatment method for managing pudendal neuralgia cases. Considering both modalities in cases with proven pudendal neuralgia is valuable.

脉冲射频与脉冲剂量模式射频治疗阴部神经痛患者的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
背景:阴部神经痛是一种涉及阴部神经皮节的疼痛性神经性疾病。这是一种难以治疗的慢性疼痛疾病,对男性和女性都有影响。本研究的目的是检测两种不同的射频治疗类型的有效性和安全性:脉冲射频和脉冲剂量射频,作为阴部神经痛病例的治疗方式,通过两组之间视觉模拟量表的变化来评估。方法:纳入研究的100例患者中,有80例阴部神经痛符合纳入/排除标准。他们被随机分为两组:PRF组,包括38名接受脉冲射频治疗的患者;PDRF组,包括39名接受脉冲剂量射频治疗的患者。主要结局是使用视觉模拟评分评估疼痛,而次要结局包括患者健康问卷-9、干预后药物使用量和治疗不良事件。结果:两组的基本人口学资料相符。然而,随着时间的推移,各组VAS平均评分存在差异(P0.05),与PRF组相比,PDRF组视觉模拟评分无显著降低。此外,随着时间的推移,每组患者健康问卷(9)均有统计学意义上的显著降低(P0.05), PDRF组降低幅度更大。结论:脉冲射频和脉冲剂量射频作为治疗阴部神经痛的一种有效、安全的方法。考虑两种方式的情况下,证实阴部神经痛是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信