Clinical Trial Discussion and Participation in a Breast Cancer Cohort by Race and Ethnicity.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nan Chen, Jincong Q Freeman, Fangyuan Zhao, Leah Goldberg, Sudha R Yarlagadda, Elizabeth Terman, Dezheng Huo, Rita Nanda
{"title":"Clinical Trial Discussion and Participation in a Breast Cancer Cohort by Race and Ethnicity.","authors":"Nan Chen, Jincong Q Freeman, Fangyuan Zhao, Leah Goldberg, Sudha R Yarlagadda, Elizabeth Terman, Dezheng Huo, Rita Nanda","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer clinical trial participation pose a significant barrier to providing equitable care. Black and Hispanic patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and an improved understanding of barriers to enrollment is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine patterns of clinical trial discussion and participation and patient attitudes toward clinical trial participation in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used survey data from patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Patients were queried about clinical trial discussion and subsequent enrollment in a therapeutic clinical trial. Barriers to trial enrollment were also assessed. Surveys were conducted from July to September 2022, and data were analyzed from February to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Self-reported race and ethnicity, including Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes of interest were discussing participation in a breast cancer clinical trial with a health care practitioner, participating in a clinical trial, and barriers to trial enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1150 respondents (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.9] years), 51 (4.4%) were Asian, 224 (19.5%) were Black, 35 (3.1%) were Hispanic, and 838 (73.0%) were White. A total of 447 respondents (38.9%) reported discussing trial participation with a health care practitioner. There were no differences in trial discussion between White patients and other racial groups (Asian: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31-1.82; Black: AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.21; Hispanic: AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26-2.08). Among 443 patients offered a trial, 285 (64.3%) participated. While there were differences in trial participation across racial and ethnic groups, these differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Among 158 patients who did not enroll in the trial offered, 37 (23.4%) reported ineligibility, 17 (10.8%) were worried about the possibility of getting a placebo, 16 (10.1%) were worried about extra time required, and 14 (8.9%) were worried about possible adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study demonstrated that when offered, patients across racial and ethnic groups were equally likely to participate in clinical trials. In addition to ineligibility, time toxicity was a significant barrier to enrollment. These data provide valuable insights that can serve as a roadmap for how to expand access to trials for all patients, regardless of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic background.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 6","pages":"e2515205"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer clinical trial participation pose a significant barrier to providing equitable care. Black and Hispanic patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and an improved understanding of barriers to enrollment is needed.

Objective: To examine patterns of clinical trial discussion and participation and patient attitudes toward clinical trial participation in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data from patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Patients were queried about clinical trial discussion and subsequent enrollment in a therapeutic clinical trial. Barriers to trial enrollment were also assessed. Surveys were conducted from July to September 2022, and data were analyzed from February to October 2024.

Exposure: Self-reported race and ethnicity, including Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes of interest were discussing participation in a breast cancer clinical trial with a health care practitioner, participating in a clinical trial, and barriers to trial enrollment.

Results: Of 1150 respondents (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.9] years), 51 (4.4%) were Asian, 224 (19.5%) were Black, 35 (3.1%) were Hispanic, and 838 (73.0%) were White. A total of 447 respondents (38.9%) reported discussing trial participation with a health care practitioner. There were no differences in trial discussion between White patients and other racial groups (Asian: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31-1.82; Black: AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.21; Hispanic: AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26-2.08). Among 443 patients offered a trial, 285 (64.3%) participated. While there were differences in trial participation across racial and ethnic groups, these differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Among 158 patients who did not enroll in the trial offered, 37 (23.4%) reported ineligibility, 17 (10.8%) were worried about the possibility of getting a placebo, 16 (10.1%) were worried about extra time required, and 14 (8.9%) were worried about possible adverse effects.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study demonstrated that when offered, patients across racial and ethnic groups were equally likely to participate in clinical trials. In addition to ineligibility, time toxicity was a significant barrier to enrollment. These data provide valuable insights that can serve as a roadmap for how to expand access to trials for all patients, regardless of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic background.

按种族和民族划分乳腺癌队列的临床试验讨论和参与。
重要性:参与乳腺癌临床试验的种族和民族差异对提供公平护理构成重大障碍。黑人和西班牙裔患者在临床试验中的代表性不足,需要更好地了解入组障碍。目的:探讨不同乳腺癌患者临床试验讨论和参与模式以及患者对临床试验参与的态度。设计、环境和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了芝加哥多种族流行病学乳腺癌队列患者的调查数据。患者被问及临床试验讨论和随后的治疗性临床试验登记。对试验入组的障碍也进行了评估。调查于2022年7月至9月进行,数据分析于2024年2月至10月进行。暴露:自我报告的种族和民族,包括亚洲人、黑人、西班牙人和白人。主要结果和措施:关注的结果是讨论与保健医生一起参加乳腺癌临床试验、参加临床试验以及参加试验的障碍。结果:1150名调查对象(平均[SD]年龄53.7[11.9]岁)中,亚裔51人(4.4%),黑人224人(19.5%),西班牙裔35人(3.1%),白人838人(73.0%)。共有447名应答者(38.9%)报告与保健医生讨论过参加试验。白人患者和其他种族患者的试验讨论没有差异(亚洲:调整优势比[AOR], 0.75;95% ci, 0.31-1.82;黑色:AOR, 1.31;95% ci, 0.78-2.21;西班牙裔:AOR, 0.73;95% ci, 0.26-2.08)。在443名接受试验的患者中,285名(64.3%)参加了试验。虽然在不同种族和民族的试验参与中存在差异,但在调整了社会人口统计学和临床因素后,这些差异并不显著。在158名未参加试验的患者中,37名(23.4%)报告不合格,17名(10.8%)担心获得安慰剂的可能性,16名(10.1%)担心需要额外的时间,14名(8.9%)担心可能的不良反应。结论和相关性:这项横断面研究表明,当提供时,不同种族和民族的患者参与临床试验的可能性相同。除了不合格之外,时间毒性是注册的一个重要障碍。这些数据提供了有价值的见解,可以作为如何扩大所有患者获得试验的路线图,无论种族、民族和社会经济背景如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信