Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship in public health facilities in Malawi through a participatory epidemiology approach.

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf103
Adriano F Lubanga, Akim N Bwanali, Sibongile Kondowe, Ellen Nzima, Abgail Masi, Yaleka Njikho, Cynthia Chitule, Gracian Harawa, Steward Mudenda, Gillian Mwale, Tumaini Makole, Samuel Mpinganjira, Thomas Nyirenda, Collins Mitambo
{"title":"Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship in public health facilities in Malawi through a participatory epidemiology approach.","authors":"Adriano F Lubanga, Akim N Bwanali, Sibongile Kondowe, Ellen Nzima, Abgail Masi, Yaleka Njikho, Cynthia Chitule, Gracian Harawa, Steward Mudenda, Gillian Mwale, Tumaini Makole, Samuel Mpinganjira, Thomas Nyirenda, Collins Mitambo","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In healthcare settings, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is largely driven by excessive use of antibiotics. Empirical prescription largely remains common due to fragile healthcare systems characterized by lack of appropriate diagnostic services. Despite limited data on the epidemiology and the burden of AMR due to the scarcity of routine microbiology facilities, it is evident that Malawi shares a heavy burden of AMR. Effectively implemented antimicrobial stewardship programmes have demonstrated successes in minimizing inappropriate antibiotic usage, and curbing the burden of AMR. However, there are limited data on how antimicrobial stewardship teams can effectively deliver their roles in hospital settings in resource limited settings, including in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Malawi's Antimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Centre (AMRCC) in collaboration with Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS) conducted participatory workshops with hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship committees aimed at establishing drivers of resistance and antibiotic overuse in hospitals from the perspective of the committees, and co-design facility-friendly intervention against AMR. The workshops consisted of participatory discussion, sorting and design thinking exercises, utilizing principles of implementation research. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed, revealing key drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key drivers of AMR included limited antibiotic formulary access, poor cross-sectoral coordination challenges between healthcare, veterinary services, government agencies and private facilities, and culturally specific barriers. The participants recommended regular training for healthcare workers on AMR and infection prevention and control (IPC), widespread dissemination of AMR findings, public awareness, introducing electronic monitoring systems and the enforcement of antibiotic restriction policies as the best measures for improving rational antimicrobial use and controlling the spread of AMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the complexity of the drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings, as well as the need for more participatory approaches in tackling the complex challenge of AMR. The findings also signify the importance of a bottom-up approach in designing a solution for promoting antimicrobial stewardship and controlling resistance in hospital and community settings. Participatory approaches blended with principles of implementation research will help to identify contextual challenges, and help to design solutions that are people-centred, context-specific and largely accepted by all involved stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 3","pages":"dlaf103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In healthcare settings, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is largely driven by excessive use of antibiotics. Empirical prescription largely remains common due to fragile healthcare systems characterized by lack of appropriate diagnostic services. Despite limited data on the epidemiology and the burden of AMR due to the scarcity of routine microbiology facilities, it is evident that Malawi shares a heavy burden of AMR. Effectively implemented antimicrobial stewardship programmes have demonstrated successes in minimizing inappropriate antibiotic usage, and curbing the burden of AMR. However, there are limited data on how antimicrobial stewardship teams can effectively deliver their roles in hospital settings in resource limited settings, including in Malawi.

Methods: Malawi's Antimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Centre (AMRCC) in collaboration with Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS) conducted participatory workshops with hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship committees aimed at establishing drivers of resistance and antibiotic overuse in hospitals from the perspective of the committees, and co-design facility-friendly intervention against AMR. The workshops consisted of participatory discussion, sorting and design thinking exercises, utilizing principles of implementation research. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed, revealing key drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Key drivers of AMR included limited antibiotic formulary access, poor cross-sectoral coordination challenges between healthcare, veterinary services, government agencies and private facilities, and culturally specific barriers. The participants recommended regular training for healthcare workers on AMR and infection prevention and control (IPC), widespread dissemination of AMR findings, public awareness, introducing electronic monitoring systems and the enforcement of antibiotic restriction policies as the best measures for improving rational antimicrobial use and controlling the spread of AMR.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the complexity of the drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings, as well as the need for more participatory approaches in tackling the complex challenge of AMR. The findings also signify the importance of a bottom-up approach in designing a solution for promoting antimicrobial stewardship and controlling resistance in hospital and community settings. Participatory approaches blended with principles of implementation research will help to identify contextual challenges, and help to design solutions that are people-centred, context-specific and largely accepted by all involved stakeholders.

通过参与式流行病学方法加强马拉维公共卫生设施的抗微生物药物管理。
背景:在卫生保健环境中,抗生素耐药性(AMR)主要是由过度使用抗生素引起的。由于缺乏适当诊断服务的脆弱医疗系统,经验处方在很大程度上仍然很常见。尽管由于缺乏常规微生物设施,关于流行病学和抗菌素耐药性负担的数据有限,但显然马拉维分担了抗菌素耐药性的沉重负担。有效实施的抗菌素管理规划在尽量减少抗生素不当使用和遏制抗生素耐药性负担方面取得了成功。然而,关于抗菌剂管理小组如何在资源有限的医院环境中有效发挥作用的数据有限,包括在马拉维。方法:马拉维抗菌素耐药性国家协调中心(AMRCC)与临床研究教育和管理服务(CREAMS)合作,与医院抗菌素管理委员会开展了参与性讲习班,旨在从委员会的角度确定医院耐药和抗生素过度使用的驱动因素,并共同设计设施友好型抗菌素耐药性干预措施。讲习班包括参与性讨论、分类和设计思维练习,利用实施研究的原则。所有访谈都进行了记录、转录和专题分析,揭示了医院环境中抗生素过度使用和耐药性的主要驱动因素。数据分析采用主题内容分析。结果:抗生素耐药性的主要驱动因素包括有限的抗生素处方获取,卫生保健、兽医服务、政府机构和私营机构之间缺乏跨部门协调挑战,以及文化特定障碍。与会者建议对卫生保健工作者进行抗生素耐药性和感染预防与控制(IPC)方面的定期培训,广泛传播抗生素耐药性调查结果,提高公众意识,引入电子监测系统和实施抗生素限制政策,作为改善合理使用抗菌药物和控制抗生素耐药性传播的最佳措施。结论:我们的研究结果强调了医院环境中抗生素过度使用和耐药性驱动因素的复杂性,以及需要更多的参与性方法来应对抗生素耐药性的复杂挑战。研究结果还表明,在设计解决方案以促进医院和社区环境中的抗菌素管理和控制耐药性方面,自下而上的方法非常重要。参与式方法与实施研究原则相结合,将有助于确定情境挑战,并有助于设计以人为本、针对具体情境并在很大程度上为所有相关利益攸关方所接受的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信