Potassium-competitive acid blocker has more negative impacts on clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors than those of proton pump inhibitors.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Masaya Takahashi, Hitomi Nakatsukasa, Masahito Shibano, Yusuke Ishigami, Takako Oka, Yoko Tani, Tomoya Kawaguchi, Yasutaka Nakamura, Hiroyasu Kaneda
{"title":"Potassium-competitive acid blocker has more negative impacts on clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors than those of proton pump inhibitors.","authors":"Masaya Takahashi, Hitomi Nakatsukasa, Masahito Shibano, Yusuke Ishigami, Takako Oka, Yoko Tani, Tomoya Kawaguchi, Yasutaka Nakamura, Hiroyasu Kaneda","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02805-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are well-known inducers of gut dysbiosis because oral bacteria cannot be sterilized owing to their gastric acid-suppressing effect. PPI-induced gut dysbiosis is associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although vonoprazan exhibits more powerful acid suppression than PPIs, its effect on ICI therapy outcomes remains unknown. We evaluated vonoprazan on ICI therapy efficacy in patients with NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC receiving ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021 at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 289 patients, 121 received PPIs, 22 received vonoprazan, and 146 did not receive either vonoprazan or PPIs (control group). In multivariate analysis, the PFS in the PPI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.21; p = 0.0014) and vonoprazan groups (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.47-4.23; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the control group. The OS in the PPI (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45; p = 0.0017) and vonoprazan groups (HR, 5.24; 95% CI, 2.88-9.53; p < 0.001) were also significantly shorter than those in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vonoprazan was associated with worse PFS and OS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs than those who did not receive PPIs or vonoprazan. Moreover, vonoprazan may have a more negative impact on ICI therapy efficacy than PPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1582-1592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02805-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are well-known inducers of gut dysbiosis because oral bacteria cannot be sterilized owing to their gastric acid-suppressing effect. PPI-induced gut dysbiosis is associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although vonoprazan exhibits more powerful acid suppression than PPIs, its effect on ICI therapy outcomes remains unknown. We evaluated vonoprazan on ICI therapy efficacy in patients with NSCLC.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC receiving ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021 at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital.

Results: Of the 289 patients, 121 received PPIs, 22 received vonoprazan, and 146 did not receive either vonoprazan or PPIs (control group). In multivariate analysis, the PFS in the PPI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.21; p = 0.0014) and vonoprazan groups (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.47-4.23; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those in the control group. The OS in the PPI (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45; p = 0.0017) and vonoprazan groups (HR, 5.24; 95% CI, 2.88-9.53; p < 0.001) were also significantly shorter than those in the control group.

Conclusion: Vonoprazan was associated with worse PFS and OS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs than those who did not receive PPIs or vonoprazan. Moreover, vonoprazan may have a more negative impact on ICI therapy efficacy than PPI.

与质子泵抑制剂相比,钾竞争酸阻滞剂对检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结果有更大的负面影响。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是众所周知的肠道生态失调的诱导剂,因为它们的抑胃酸作用使口腔细菌无法消毒。在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,ppi诱导的肠道生态失调与较短的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关。尽管vonoprazan表现出比PPIs更强的抑酸作用,但其对ICI治疗结果的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了vonoprazan对非小细胞肺癌患者ICI治疗的疗效。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月在大阪都市大学医院接受ICI单药或ICI加化疗的≥18岁晚期或复发性NSCLC患者。结果:289例患者中,121例接受PPIs治疗,22例接受vonoprazan治疗,146例不接受vonoprazan或PPIs治疗(对照组)。在多变量分析中,PFS与PPI(风险比[HR], 1.63;95%置信区间[CI], 1.21-2.21;p = 0.0014)和vonoprazan组(HR, 2.49;95% ci, 1.47-4.23;结论:与未接受ppi或Vonoprazan治疗的NSCLC患者相比,接受ICIs治疗的NSCLC患者的PFS和OS更差。此外,vonoprazan对ICI治疗效果的负面影响可能比PPI更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信