Facilitated group care for maternal and child health model fidelity: A scoping review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2517788
Ashley Gresh, Phoebe Parker, Anne Batchelder, Jalana Lazar, Christina X Marea, Camilla Bjelland, Rohan D Jeremiah, Giovanna Cristina Machado-Kayzuka, Hayden Geibel, Dhruvi R Patel, Esnath Kapito, Kathleen F Norr, Crystal L Patil
{"title":"Facilitated group care for maternal and child health model fidelity: A scoping review.","authors":"Ashley Gresh, Phoebe Parker, Anne Batchelder, Jalana Lazar, Christina X Marea, Camilla Bjelland, Rohan D Jeremiah, Giovanna Cristina Machado-Kayzuka, Hayden Geibel, Dhruvi R Patel, Esnath Kapito, Kathleen F Norr, Crystal L Patil","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2517788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group care is a transformative model of prenatal, postnatal, and well-child care. The Centering-based group care model has three core components: health care, interactive learning, and community building. It has been implemented in 33 countries with associated improved maternal and child health outcomes. Maintaining fidelity to the model is essential for its effectiveness. However, to date no standardised measure of fidelity to the group care model exists. This review aimed to explore how fidelity is measured in group care and identify common themes to understand what is essential to maintain fidelity. We used the scoping review framework by Arksey & O'Malley, which included a consultation of experts and the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity to organise themes across group care fidelity measurement tools. Twenty-four articles were included spanning 12 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America. Common themes were: 1) adherence to the three core components; 2) exposure is not well understood; 3) quality of delivery is interconnected with facilitators' training; 4) participant responsiveness is focused on group dynamics; and 5) programme differentiation focused on type of facilitators. This review lays the foundation for creating a standardised tool to measure fidelity to the group care model across settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2517788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2517788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group care is a transformative model of prenatal, postnatal, and well-child care. The Centering-based group care model has three core components: health care, interactive learning, and community building. It has been implemented in 33 countries with associated improved maternal and child health outcomes. Maintaining fidelity to the model is essential for its effectiveness. However, to date no standardised measure of fidelity to the group care model exists. This review aimed to explore how fidelity is measured in group care and identify common themes to understand what is essential to maintain fidelity. We used the scoping review framework by Arksey & O'Malley, which included a consultation of experts and the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity to organise themes across group care fidelity measurement tools. Twenty-four articles were included spanning 12 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America. Common themes were: 1) adherence to the three core components; 2) exposure is not well understood; 3) quality of delivery is interconnected with facilitators' training; 4) participant responsiveness is focused on group dynamics; and 5) programme differentiation focused on type of facilitators. This review lays the foundation for creating a standardised tool to measure fidelity to the group care model across settings.

促进小组护理对孕产妇和儿童健康模式的忠诚:范围审查。
集体护理是产前、产后和幼儿护理的一种变革模式。以中心为基础的团体护理模式有三个核心组成部分:卫生保健、互动学习和社区建设。该计划已在33个国家实施,孕产妇和儿童健康结果得到改善。保持模型的保真度对其有效性至关重要。然而,到目前为止,还没有对群体护理模式忠实度的标准化测量。本综述旨在探讨如何在群体关怀中衡量忠诚,并确定共同的主题,以了解维持忠诚的必要条件。我们使用了Arksey & O'Malley的范围审查框架,其中包括专家咨询和实施保真度概念框架,以组织跨群体护理保真度测量工具的主题。24篇文章涵盖了非洲、亚洲、欧洲和北美的12个国家。共同的主题是:1)坚持三个核心组成部分;2)暴露不清楚;3)授课质量与辅导员的培训相互关联;4)参与者响应性关注群体动力学;5)方案差异化侧重于促进者的类型。本综述为创建一个标准化的工具来衡量跨设置的群体护理模式的保真度奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信