Prognostic biomarkers for the development of progressive pulmonary fibrosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a systematic review.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-06-11 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0282-2024
Iris A Simons, Daniël A Korevaar, Nerissa P Denswil, A H Maitland-van der Zee, Esther J Nossent, Jan Willem Duitman
{"title":"Prognostic biomarkers for the development of progressive pulmonary fibrosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a systematic review.","authors":"Iris A Simons, Daniël A Korevaar, Nerissa P Denswil, A H Maitland-van der Zee, Esther J Nossent, Jan Willem Duitman","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0282-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) an ongoing immune response triggers pulmonary inflammation and concurrent fibrotic pathways, leading to irreversible disease progression. Patients with the progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype have a poor prognosis. Reliable identification of biomarkers to predict PPF could aid clinicians in determining disease prognosis and optimising patient care. We aimed to identify prognostic biomarkers for the PPF phenotype in fHP using existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42024537599) and searched Medline, Embase and Scopus from inception to 10 April 2024. We included studies that evaluated the ability of biomarkers measured in blood or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) to predict disease progression in adult patients with fHP. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3027 articles initially identified, 31 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 3766 fHP patients. 65 biomarkers were identified; however, most were evaluated in only one (n=49) or two (n=6) studies. The most frequently evaluated biomarkers were BALF cellular composition, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and serum surfactant protein D levels. Survival was the most commonly assessed outcome, followed by disease progression and acute exacerbation. None of the biomarkers reliably predicted the prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A large number of biomarkers have been evaluated for their prognostic ability in fHP, but none of them appear to be consistently associated with the PPF phenotype. Heterogeneity across studies in terms of methods, disease definitions, outcomes and measurement time points complicates the identification of a marker with strong potential, and this situation should be improved in the clinical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 176","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0282-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) an ongoing immune response triggers pulmonary inflammation and concurrent fibrotic pathways, leading to irreversible disease progression. Patients with the progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype have a poor prognosis. Reliable identification of biomarkers to predict PPF could aid clinicians in determining disease prognosis and optimising patient care. We aimed to identify prognostic biomarkers for the PPF phenotype in fHP using existing literature.

Methods: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42024537599) and searched Medline, Embase and Scopus from inception to 10 April 2024. We included studies that evaluated the ability of biomarkers measured in blood or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) to predict disease progression in adult patients with fHP. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies tool.

Results: Of the 3027 articles initially identified, 31 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 3766 fHP patients. 65 biomarkers were identified; however, most were evaluated in only one (n=49) or two (n=6) studies. The most frequently evaluated biomarkers were BALF cellular composition, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 and serum surfactant protein D levels. Survival was the most commonly assessed outcome, followed by disease progression and acute exacerbation. None of the biomarkers reliably predicted the prognosis.

Conclusions: A large number of biomarkers have been evaluated for their prognostic ability in fHP, but none of them appear to be consistently associated with the PPF phenotype. Heterogeneity across studies in terms of methods, disease definitions, outcomes and measurement time points complicates the identification of a marker with strong potential, and this situation should be improved in the clinical field.

过敏性肺炎进行性肺纤维化发展的预后生物标志物:一项系统综述。
背景:在纤维化超敏性肺炎(fHP)中,持续的免疫反应触发肺部炎症和并发纤维化途径,导致不可逆转的疾病进展。进行性肺纤维化(PPF)表型患者预后较差。可靠地识别生物标志物来预测PPF可以帮助临床医生确定疾病预后和优化患者护理。我们的目的是利用现有文献确定fHP中PPF表型的预后生物标志物。方法:我们进行系统评价(PROSPERO, CRD42024537599),检索Medline, Embase和Scopus,检索时间为成立至2024年4月10日。我们纳入了评估血液或支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中测量的生物标志物预测成年fHP患者疾病进展能力的研究。使用预后准确性研究质量评估工具评估研究质量。结果:在最初确定的3027篇文章中,31篇符合纳入标准,共包括3766名fHP患者。鉴定出65种生物标志物;然而,大多数仅在一项(n=49)或两项(n=6)研究中进行了评估。最常评估的生物标志物是BALF细胞组成、血清克雷布斯-冯-登-肺根-6和血清表面活性剂蛋白D水平。生存是最常见的评估结果,其次是疾病进展和急性恶化。没有一种生物标志物能可靠地预测预后。结论:大量生物标志物已被评估其在fHP中的预后能力,但没有一个似乎与PPF表型一致。研究在方法、疾病定义、结果和测量时间点等方面的异质性使识别具有强大潜力的标志物变得复杂,这种情况应在临床领域得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信