Analysis of the relationship between histamine H1 receptor antagonists and broad dementia events using the FAERS, JADER, and CVAR databases.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jingjing Kan, Yechao Chen, Qiaoling Gu, Na Hu, Yanli Qiao, Yawen Chen, Dayu Chen, Haixia Zhang
{"title":"Analysis of the relationship between histamine H1 receptor antagonists and broad dementia events using the FAERS, JADER, and CVAR databases.","authors":"Jingjing Kan, Yechao Chen, Qiaoling Gu, Na Hu, Yanli Qiao, Yawen Chen, Dayu Chen, Haixia Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2517232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies suggest histamine H1 receptor antagonists (H1RAs) may elevate broad dementia events risk, though real-world data remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pharmacovigilance study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER), and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) databases from January 2004 to June 2024. Using disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportion reporting ratio (PRR), time-to-onset analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate regression, we compared broad dementia event signals among first-generation H1RAs (FG-H1RAs), second-generation H1RAs (SG-H1RAs), and benzodiazepines (BDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the FAERS database, FG-H1RAs (ROR = 3.33, 95%CI 3.22-3.44; PRR = 3.11, χ2 = 5426.01), SG-H1RAs (ROR = 2.03, 95%CI 1.98-2.07; PRR = 1.97, χ2 = 3706.58), and BDs (ROR = 2.74, 95%CI 2.68-2.80; PRR = 2.6, χ2 = 8338.34) were significantly associated with broad dementia events, with FG-H1RAs having a stronger association with broad dementia events compared to SG-H1RAs (aROR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.54-0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis of the JADER and CVAR databases yielded similar results. FG-H1RAs exhibited immediate broad dementia events reporting (median = 0 days), while SG-H1RAs showed delayed onset (median = 1 day), both with early risk decay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence for the association between H1RAs treatment and broad dementia events, highlighting signaling differences among H1RAs. However, large-scale, high-quality epidemiological studies are still needed for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2517232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest histamine H1 receptor antagonists (H1RAs) may elevate broad dementia events risk, though real-world data remain scarce.

Methods: This pharmacovigilance study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER), and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) databases from January 2004 to June 2024. Using disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportion reporting ratio (PRR), time-to-onset analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate regression, we compared broad dementia event signals among first-generation H1RAs (FG-H1RAs), second-generation H1RAs (SG-H1RAs), and benzodiazepines (BDs).

Results: According to the FAERS database, FG-H1RAs (ROR = 3.33, 95%CI 3.22-3.44; PRR = 3.11, χ2 = 5426.01), SG-H1RAs (ROR = 2.03, 95%CI 1.98-2.07; PRR = 1.97, χ2 = 3706.58), and BDs (ROR = 2.74, 95%CI 2.68-2.80; PRR = 2.6, χ2 = 8338.34) were significantly associated with broad dementia events, with FG-H1RAs having a stronger association with broad dementia events compared to SG-H1RAs (aROR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.54-0.67, p < 0.001). Analysis of the JADER and CVAR databases yielded similar results. FG-H1RAs exhibited immediate broad dementia events reporting (median = 0 days), while SG-H1RAs showed delayed onset (median = 1 day), both with early risk decay.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the association between H1RAs treatment and broad dementia events, highlighting signaling differences among H1RAs. However, large-scale, high-quality epidemiological studies are still needed for validation.

使用FAERS、JADER和CVAR数据库分析组胺H1受体拮抗剂与广泛痴呆事件之间的关系。
背景:最近的研究表明,组胺H1受体拮抗剂(H1RAs)可能会增加广泛的痴呆事件风险,尽管现实世界的数据仍然很少。方法:本药物警戒研究分析了2004年1月至2024年6月美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)、日本不良事件报告(JADER)和加拿大警戒不良反应(CVAR)数据库。使用歧化分析,如报告优势比(ROR)和比例报告比(PRR)、发病时间分析、倾向评分匹配和多变量回归,我们比较了第一代H1RAs (gf -H1RAs)、第二代H1RAs (SG-H1RAs)和苯二氮卓类药物(bd)之间广泛的痴呆事件信号。结果:FAERS数据库显示,FG-H1RAs (ROR = 3.33, 95%CI 3.22-3.44;PRR = 3.11,χ2 = 5426.01),SG-H1RAs (ROR = 2.03, 95% ci 1.98 - -2.07;PRR = 1.97,χ2 = 3706.58),BDs (ROR = 2.74, 95% ci 2.68 - -2.80;PRR = 2.6, χ2 = 8338.34)与广泛性痴呆事件显著相关,FG-H1RAs与广泛性痴呆事件的相关性比SG-H1RAs更强(aROR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.54-0.67, p)结论:本研究为H1RAs治疗与广泛性痴呆事件之间的关联提供了证据,突出了H1RAs之间的信号差异。然而,仍需要大规模、高质量的流行病学研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信