Comparative assessment of the spot sign and leakage sign as predictive factors for spontaneous intracranial hematoma expansion.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
María Del Carmen González Domínguez, Roberto Fornell-Pérez, Ernesto Santana Suárez, Diego Riol Sancho, Elisabet González Domínguez, Juan Francisco Loro-Ferrer
{"title":"Comparative assessment of the spot sign and leakage sign as predictive factors for spontaneous intracranial hematoma expansion.","authors":"María Del Carmen González Domínguez, Roberto Fornell-Pérez, Ernesto Santana Suárez, Diego Riol Sancho, Elisabet González Domínguez, Juan Francisco Loro-Ferrer","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02352-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of two radiological markers, the spot sign and leakage sign, for spontaneous intracranial hematoma expansion and their association with clinical outcomes, including neurological deterioration and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study included 94 adult patients with spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhagic stroke, confirmed by non-enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in the arterial phase. Hematoma volumes and spot/leakage signs were assessed using standardized imaging protocols and analyzed by two blinded neuroradiologists. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated using multivariate analyses, with survival outcomes compared via Kaplan-Meier curves. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 94 patients, hematoma expansion occurred in 42%, neurological deterioration in 15.5%, and mortality in 39.4%. The leakage sign was the strongest independent predictor of hematoma expansion (OR: 9.27, 95% CI: 2.95-29.20), neurological deterioration (OR: 26.67, 95% CI: 1.62-47.39), and mortality (OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 2.97-19.25). The spot and leakage signs demonstrated high specificity for predicting outcomes, with the leakage sign showing greater sensitivity for hematoma expansion. Patients with a positive leakage sign had significantly lower median survival (6 days) compared to those with a positive spot sign alone (54 days) or no signs (110 days, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The leakage sign demonstrated greater sensitivity and comparable specificity to the spot sign for predicting hematoma expansion. Both signs were associated with neurological deterioration and in-hospital mortality, with the leakage sign showing a stronger predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02352-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the predictive value of two radiological markers, the spot sign and leakage sign, for spontaneous intracranial hematoma expansion and their association with clinical outcomes, including neurological deterioration and in-hospital mortality.

Materials & methods: This prospective single-center study included 94 adult patients with spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhagic stroke, confirmed by non-enhanced CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in the arterial phase. Hematoma volumes and spot/leakage signs were assessed using standardized imaging protocols and analyzed by two blinded neuroradiologists. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated using multivariate analyses, with survival outcomes compared via Kaplan-Meier curves. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: Among 94 patients, hematoma expansion occurred in 42%, neurological deterioration in 15.5%, and mortality in 39.4%. The leakage sign was the strongest independent predictor of hematoma expansion (OR: 9.27, 95% CI: 2.95-29.20), neurological deterioration (OR: 26.67, 95% CI: 1.62-47.39), and mortality (OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 2.97-19.25). The spot and leakage signs demonstrated high specificity for predicting outcomes, with the leakage sign showing greater sensitivity for hematoma expansion. Patients with a positive leakage sign had significantly lower median survival (6 days) compared to those with a positive spot sign alone (54 days) or no signs (110 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The leakage sign demonstrated greater sensitivity and comparable specificity to the spot sign for predicting hematoma expansion. Both signs were associated with neurological deterioration and in-hospital mortality, with the leakage sign showing a stronger predictive value.

斑点征与漏征作为自发性颅内血肿扩张预测因素的比较评价。
目的:评价斑点征象和渗漏征象两种放射学指标对自发性颅内血肿扩张的预测价值及其与临床预后(包括神经系统恶化和住院死亡率)的关系。材料与方法:本前瞻性单中心研究纳入94例自发性肺实质内出血性卒中成人患者,经动脉期非增强CT (NECT)和增强CT (CECT)证实。采用标准化成像方案评估血肿体积和斑点/渗漏征象,并由两名盲法神经放射学家进行分析。临床和放射学资料采用多变量分析进行评估,生存结果通过Kaplan-Meier曲线进行比较。p≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:94例患者中,血肿扩张发生率为42%,神经功能恶化发生率为15.5%,死亡率为39.4%。漏征是血肿扩张(OR: 9.27, 95% CI: 2.95-29.20)、神经功能恶化(OR: 26.67, 95% CI: 1.62-47.39)和死亡率(OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 2.97-19.25)的最强独立预测因子。斑点和渗漏征象在预测预后方面具有很高的特异性,其中渗漏征象对血肿扩张表现出更高的敏感性。与单纯斑点征象阳性患者(54天)或无斑点征象患者(110天)相比,有渗漏征象阳性患者的中位生存期(6天)显著降低。结论:在预测血肿扩张方面,渗漏征象比斑点征象具有更高的敏感性和相当的特异性。这两种体征都与神经系统恶化和住院死亡率相关,其中渗漏体征具有更强的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信